Public relations, Delphi method, Management science, Public participation and Empirical research are his primary areas of study. His work on Public engagement as part of general Public relations research is frequently linked to Research community, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His study in Delphi method is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Coherence and Dilemma.
His Management science study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Public involvement, Citizens' jury and Mechanism. Gene Rowe has researched Public participation in several fields, including Variety and Affect. His Empirical research research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Impact factor, Control, Wideband delphi and Task.
His primary areas of study are Public relations, Public engagement, Delphi method, Risk perception and Public participation. His work in Public relations covers topics such as Quality which are related to areas like Variety. The concepts of his Public engagement study are interwoven with issues in Public debate, Higher education, Public administration, Commercialization and Normative.
His research integrates issues of Control and Management science in his study of Delphi method. His studies deal with areas such as Social psychology, ROWE, Food safety, Risk management and Public opinion as well as Risk perception. His Public participation research includes themes of Science policy and Public policy.
Gene Rowe mostly deals with Public engagement, Public administration, Medical education, Key and Process engineering. His Public engagement study incorporates themes from Public participation, Higher education, Science policy and Democracy. His Higher education research includes elements of Public relations and Organizational culture.
His study on Training is often connected to Knowledge elicitation and Report evaluation as part of broader study in Medical education. His work deals with themes such as Prevalence, Exploratory research and Environmental health, which intersect with Focus group. The study incorporates disciplines such as Psychometrics and Clinical psychology in addition to Patient satisfaction.
Gene Rowe spends much of his time researching Knowledge management, Clinical psychology, Psychometrics, Small range and Current practice. Combining a variety of fields, including Knowledge management, Sociology of scientific knowledge, Weighting, Argument, Expert elicitation and Raising, are what the author presents in his essays. Gene Rowe has included themes like Patient satisfaction, Odds ratio, Health care and Reliability, Cronbach's alpha in his Clinical psychology study.
His Psychometrics research includes elements of Conceptual framework, Gerontology, MEDLINE, Feeling and Patient experience. Other disciplines of study, such as Public administration and Policy development, are mixed together with his Small range studies.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis
Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(1999)
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation:
Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer.
Science, Technology, & Human Values (2000)
A typology of public engagement mechanisms
Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer.
Science, Technology, & Human Values (2005)
Evaluating Public Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer.
Science, Technology, & Human Values (2004)
Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory
Gene Rowe;George Wright;Fergus Bolger.
(1991)
Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique
Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(2001)
The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆
Gene Rowe;George Wright.
(2011)
Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference
Gene Rowe;Roy Marsh;Lynn J. Frewer.
Science, Technology, & Human Values (2004)
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: A review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations
Ann Bowling;G. Rowe;N. Lambert;M. Waddington.
(2012)
Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?
Gene Rowe;George Wright.
Risk Analysis (2001)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of Strathclyde
Newcastle University
University of Southampton
Cardiff University
Cardiff University
University of Bristol
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Wageningen University & Research
University of East Anglia
ETH Zurich
Lanzhou University
Stanford University
Hong Kong Baptist University
Cornell University
Queen's University Belfast
Emory University
University of Sydney
Technical University of Munich
City University of New York
Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Florence
Virginia Commonwealth University
University of British Columbia
Queensland University of Technology
University of Chichester
McGill University