World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
21432
World Ranking
2500
National Ranking
1219

Gene Rowe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene Rowe sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gene Rowe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gene Rowe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gene Rowe is affiliated with Norwich University in the United States. Their research spans the Social Sciences with a focus on several subfields including Education, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Molecular Biology, and Physiology.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, notable coauthors of Gene Rowe include:

  • Fergus Bolger
  • Richard Watermeyer
  • Eli Y. Adashi
  • Michael Burgess
  • Simon Burall

Gene Rowe has contributed to several academic venues with publications in:

  • Studies in Higher Education
  • The CRISPR Journal
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • EFSA Supporting Publications

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Public engagement professionals in a prestige economy: Ghosts in the machine," 2021, published in Studies in Higher Education
  • "Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Public Engagement Imperative," 2020, published in The CRISPR Journal
  • "Virtuous opinion change in structured groups," 2023, published in Judgment and Decision Making
  • "Expert knowledge elicitation on African Swine Fever and outdoor farming of pigs," 2021, published in EFSA Supporting Publications

Best Publications

  • The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation:

    Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer

  • A typology of public engagement mechanisms

    Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Evaluating Public Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda

    Gene Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory

    Gene Rowe;George Wright;Fergus Bolger

  • The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects — Introduction to the special issue☆

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies.

    L.J. Frewer;L.J. Frewer;K. Bergmann;M. Brennan;R. Lion

  • Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference

    Gene Rowe;Roy Marsh;Lynn J. Frewer

  • The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: A review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations

    Ann Bowling;G. Rowe;N. Lambert;M. Waddington

  • Differences in expert and lay judgments of risk: myth or reality?

    Gene Rowe;George Wright

  • Public Perceptions of Everyday Food Hazards: A Psychometric Study

    Chris Fife-Schaw;Gene Rowe

  • Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops

    G. Rowe;Thomas Edward Horlick-Jones;J. Walls;Nicholas Frank Pidgeon

  • Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales

    Ann Bowling;Gene Rowe;Sue Adams;Paula Sands

  • Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study

    Ellen van Kleef;Lynn J. Frewer;George M. Chryssochoidis;Julie R. Houghton

  • Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence

    Gene Rowe;George Wright;Andy McColl

  • The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and Priorities

    J.R. Houghton;G. Rowe;Lynn J. Frewer;E. van Kleef

  • Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision-making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate

    Nicholas Frank Pidgeon;Wouter Poortinga;Gene Rowe;Thomas Edward Horlick-Jones

  • The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement

    Thomas Edward Horlick-Jones;John Walls;Gene Rowe;Nicholas Frank Pidgeon

  • Patients’ experiences of their healthcare in relation to their expectations and satisfaction: a population survey

    Ann Bowling;Gene Rowe;Martin McKee

  • A working procedure for identifying emerging food safety issues at an early stage: Implications for European and international risk management practices

    H.J.P. Marvin;G.A. Kleter;L.J. Frewer;S.F. Cope

Frequent Co-Authors

George Wright
George Wright University of Strathclyde
Lynn J. Frewer
Lynn J. Frewer Newcastle University
Ann Bowling
Ann Bowling University of Southampton
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon Cardiff University
Wouter Poortinga
Wouter Poortinga Cardiff University
Barnaby C Reeves
Barnaby C Reeves University of Bristol
Arnout R. H. Fischer
Arnout R. H. Fischer Wageningen University & Research
Timothy O'Riordan
Timothy O'Riordan University of East Anglia
Shah Ebrahim
Shah Ebrahim London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities offers many rewarding pathways. With the rise of online learning, flexible options are now available for gaining essential qualifications, often at a lower cost or with faster completion times. For those interested in mental health or counseling, exploring affordable online psychology degrees can be an excellent starting point, allowing students to balance life commitments with their education.

If you aim to make an impact through social work, consider one of the online msw programs that provide accessible routes to a Master’s in Social Work. For those seeking doctoral-level credentials, psy d programs offer focused training for careers in clinical psychology, with many courses designed for online completion.

Another popular area is family counseling. The marriage and family therapy programs online can prepare you for counseling roles in as little as 12-24 months. Each path provides valuable skills and leads to meaningful work in diverse professional settings.

Best Scientists Citing Gene Rowe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles