World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julia Abelson

Julia Abelson

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
12892
World Ranking
1776
National Ranking
97

Julia Abelson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Abelson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julia Abelson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Abelson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia Abelson is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Health Professions and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research addresses a range of topics with particular attention to Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Health Policy Implementation Science, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology.

They have published frequently in venues such as Health Expectations, Healthcare Policy, Research Involvement and Engagement, Health Policy, and Research Square.

  • Understanding patient partnership in health systems: lessons from the Canadian patient partner survey (2022, BMJ Open)
  • Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis (2023, Health Research Policy and Systems)
  • Developing a Canadian evaluation framework for patient and public engagement in research: study protocol (2021, Research Involvement and Engagement)
  • The impact of COVID-19 on patient engagement in the health system: Results from a Pan-Canadian survey of patient, family and caregiver partners (2022, Health Expectations)
  • Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force (2022, Value in Health)

Julia Abelson's frequent co-authors include Meredith Vanstone, Laura Tripp, Mary Anne Levasseur, Jeonghwa You, and Rebecca Ganann.

Best Publications

  • How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers

    John N. Lavis;Dave Robertson;Jennifer M. Woodside;Christopher B. McLeod

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes

    Julia Abelson;Pierre Gerlier Forest;John Eyles;Patricia Smith

  • Examining the Role of Health Services Research in Public Policymaking

    John N. Lavis;Suzanne E. Ross;Jeremiah E. Hurley

  • Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.

    Craig Mitton;Craig Mitton;Neale Smith;Stuart Peacock;Stuart Peacock;Brian Evoy

  • 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making.

    Andrea Litva;Joanna Coast;Jenny Donovan;John Eyles

  • Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools

    Antoine Boivin;Audrey L'Espérance;François-Pierre Gauvin;Vincent Dumez

  • Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice.

    Julia Abelson;Mita Giacomini;Pascale Lehoux;Francois-Pierre Gauvin

  • Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making.

    Jennifer A. Boyko;John N. Lavis;Julia Abelson;Maureen Dobbins

  • Primary Care In Canada: So Much Innovation, So Little Change

    Brian Hutchison;Julia Abelson;John Lavis

  • Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool

    Julia Abelson;Kathy Li;Geoff Wilson;Kristin Shields

  • A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: research in need of discipline.

    Stephen B. Soumerai;Dennis Ross-Degnan;Eric E. Fortess;Julia Abelson

  • Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.

    Julia Abelson;John Eyles;Christopher B. McLeod;Patricia Collins

  • What is important to continuity in home care?. Perspectives of key stakeholders.

    Christel A Woodward;Julia Abelson;Sara Tedford;Brian Hutchison

  • Evaluating patient and public involvement in research

    Antoine Boivin;Tessa Richards;Laura Forsythe;Alexandre Grégoire

  • Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study.

    Julia Abelson;Pierre Gerlier Forest;John Eyles;Ann Casebeer

  • "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.

    Francois-Pierre Gauvin;Julia Abelson;Mita Giacomini;John Eyles

  • Assessing the Impacts of Public Participation: Concepts, Evidence and Policy Implications

    Julia Abelson;François-Pierre Gauvin

  • Are we expecting too much from print media? An analysis of newspaper coverage of the 2002 Canadian healthcare reform debate.

    Patricia A. Collins;Julia Abelson;Heather Pyman;John N. Lavis

  • How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.

    Kaelan A. Moat;John N. Lavis;John N. Lavis;Julia Abelson

  • PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.

    Julia Abelson;Frank Wagner;Deirdre DeJean;Sarah Boesveld

  • Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.

    Julia Abelson;Jonathan Lomas;John Eyles;Stephen Birch

  • What is public deliberation

    Erika Blacksher;Alice Diebel;Pierre Gerlier Forest;Susan Dorr Goold

Frequent Co-Authors

John N. Lavis
John N. Lavis McMaster University
John Eyles
John Eyles University of the Witwatersrand
Mauro Giacomini
Mauro Giacomini McMaster University
Geoffrey R. Norman
Geoffrey R. Norman McMaster University
Stephen Birch
Stephen Birch University of Queensland
Pascale Lehoux
Pascale Lehoux University of Montreal
Susan Dorr Goold
Susan Dorr Goold University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wendy J. Ungar
Wendy J. Ungar University of Toronto
James R. Dunn
James R. Dunn McMaster University
Stuart Peacock
Stuart Peacock Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse and flexible pathways for both education and careers. Many universities now offer 1 year online masters programs, allowing students to complete their degree at an accelerated pace. This can be especially beneficial for working professionals or those looking to quickly shift their career trajectory.

For undergraduates, an accelerated online bachelor's degree can help students finish their studies sooner and enter the workforce or pursue advanced education with less delay. Such programs often feature condensed schedules and flexible online coursework.

If your interests are in social work, numerous universities offer affordable msw programs online that make achieving a Master of Social Work more accessible. These programs emphasize affordability while maintaining high educational standards.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, specialized online options are available, including bcba certification programs online. These programs can lead to rewarding roles in education, healthcare, and social services—offering flexibility for different career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Abelson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles