Stuart Peacock mostly deals with Health care, Public health, Internal medicine, Cancer and Public relations. His Health care research includes elements of Multiple-criteria decision analysis and Decision analysis. His research in Multiple-criteria decision analysis intersects with topics in Quality, Analytic hierarchy process, Management science and Health care rationing.
His Public health study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Primary health care and Set. His work deals with themes such as Lung cancer, Lung cancer screening, Incidence and Pediatrics, which intersect with Cancer. His work carried out in the field of Public relations brings together such families of science as Priority setting, Medical research and Health professionals.
His primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Health care, Cancer, Oncology and Quality of life. The study incorporates disciplines such as Surgery and Cost-effectiveness analysis in addition to Internal medicine. Stuart Peacock has researched Health care in several fields, including Public relations and Public health.
His Cancer research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Demography, Cohort and Confidence interval. His studies deal with areas such as Quality-adjusted life year and Rituximab as well as Oncology. His study in Quality of life is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Applied psychology, Gerontology and Economic evaluation.
His primary areas of study are Health care, Cancer, Cohort, Clinical trial and Family medicine. His Health care research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Clinical research, Medical education and Public engagement. His work in the fields of Care cancer overlaps with other areas such as Caregiver distress.
His Cohort research includes themes of Pediatrics, Cohort study and Confidence interval. His Clinical trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Reimbursement, Cervical cancer, Hpv testing, Health economics and Obstetrics. His research on Health economics also deals with topics like
Stuart Peacock focuses on Confidence interval, Public engagement, Clinical trial, Uncertainty quantification and Cancer prognosis. His Confidence interval study incorporates themes from Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Systemic therapy, Retrospective cohort study, Standard treatment and Standard error. Stuart Peacock combines subjects such as Equity and Health care, Health administration, Public health with his study of Public engagement.
His Public health study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Economic growth and Population ageing. His work focuses on many connections between Clinical trial and other disciplines, such as Reimbursement, that overlap with his field of interest in Quality, Quality of life and Economic evaluation. His Quality of life research incorporates themes from Decision aids, Public relations and Continuance.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
Praveen Thokala;Nancy Devlin;Kevin Marsh;Rob Baltussen.
Value in Health (2016)
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
Kevin Marsh;Maarten IJzerman;Praveen Thokala;Rob Baltussen.
(2016)
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.
Craig Mitton;Craig Mitton;Neale Smith;Stuart Peacock;Stuart Peacock;Brian Evoy.
Health Policy (2009)
Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services
R A Carr-Hill;T A Sheldon;P Smith;S Martin.
BMJ (1994)
A formula for distributing NHS revenues based on small area use of hospital beds
Roy Carr-Hill;Geoffrey Hardman;Stephen Martin;Stuart Peacock.
Research Papers in Economics (1994)
Efficiency Measurement in Health and Health Care
Bruce Phillip Hollingsworth;Stuart J Peacock.
(2008)
Allocating resources to health authorities: results and policy implications of small area analysis of use of inpatient services.
P Smith;T A Sheldon;R A Carr-Hill;S Martin.
BMJ (1994)
Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial
Gina Suzanne Ogilvie;Dirk van Niekerk;Mel Krajden;Laurie W Smith.
JAMA (2018)
Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
Martin C Tammemagi;Heidi Schmidt;Simon Martel;Annette McWilliams.
Lancet Oncology (2017)
A randomized controlled trial of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening: trial design and preliminary results (HPV FOCAL Trial)
Gina S Ogilvie;Gina S Ogilvie;Dirk J van Niekerk;Dirk J van Niekerk;Mel Krajden;Ruth E Martin.
BMC Cancer (2010)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
Monash University
University of British Columbia
University of British Columbia
McGill University
Glasgow Caledonian University
Northwestern University
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
University of Sheffield
University of British Columbia
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Technische Universität Braunschweig
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
University of Pittsburgh
IrsiCaixa
Ghent University
University of California, Berkeley
Temple University
University of Tübingen
Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Vanderbilt University