World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
8871
World Ranking
3406
National Ranking
197

Stuart Peacock publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Peacock sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 239 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stuart Peacock D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Peacock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart Peacock is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and has a research focus that bridges Medicine and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Their scholarly output spans a range of topics, including oncology, health systems, economic evaluations, and public health.

The scientist has published extensively in the fields of oncology, economics and econometrics, public health, epidemiology, and general health professions. Their subfields of study include:

  • Oncology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Epidemiology

Peacock's research covers a diverse range of main topics, such as:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Key papers authored by or involving Stuart Peacock highlight their interest in oncology, health economics, and healthcare system impacts. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Cervical screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: optimising recovery strategies" (2021) published in The Lancet Public Health
  • "A perspective on life-cycle health technology assessment and real-world evidence for precision oncology in Canada" (2022) published in npj Precision Oncology
  • "End-of-life outcomes with or without early palliative care: a propensity score matched, population-based cancer cohort study" (2021) published in BMJ Open
  • "The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension (FACT-8D), a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived From the Cancer-Specific FACT-General (FACT-G) Quality of Life Questionnaire: Development and Australian Value Set" (2021) published in Value in Health
  • "The impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare system resource use and costs in two provinces in Canada: An interrupted time series analysis" (2023) published in PLoS ONE

Peacock has published frequently in several journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • Current Oncology
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Cancer Policy
  • Value in Health
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, demonstrated by frequent co-authors including:

  • Kelvin Chan
  • Helen McTaggart-Cowan
  • Reka Pataky
  • Mary A. De Vera
  • Sharlene Gill

Overall, Stuart Peacock's research integrates economic evaluation methods with clinical oncology and public health to explore healthcare delivery, cancer outcomes, quality of life measures, and pandemic-related healthcare impacts within the Canadian context and beyond.

Best Publications

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

    Praveen Thokala;Nancy Devlin;Kevin Marsh;Rob Baltussen

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

    Kevin Marsh;Maarten IJzerman;Praveen Thokala;Rob Baltussen

  • Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.

    Craig Mitton;Craig Mitton;Neale Smith;Stuart Peacock;Stuart Peacock;Brian Evoy

  • Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial

    Gina Suzanne Ogilvie;Dirk van Niekerk;Mel Krajden;Laurie W. Smith

  • Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services

    R A Carr-Hill;T A Sheldon;P Smith;S Martin

  • Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.

    Martin C Tammemagi;Heidi Schmidt;Simon Martel;Annette McWilliams

  • A formula for distributing NHS revenues based on small area use of hospital beds

    Roy Carr-Hill;Geoffrey Hardman;Stephen Martin;Stuart Peacock

  • Construction of the descriptive system for the Assessment of Quality of Life AQoL-6D utility instrument.

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Stuart James Peacock;Stuart James Peacock;Graeme Hawthorne;Angelo Anthony Iezzi

  • Efficiency Measurement in Health and Health Care

    Bruce Phillip Hollingsworth;Stuart J Peacock

  • The Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Lung Cancer Screening and Drivers of Program Efficiency

    Sonya Cressman;Stuart J. Peacock;Stuart J. Peacock;Martin C. Tammemägi;William K. Evans;William K. Evans

  • Measurement of the quality of life for economic evaluation and the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) Mark 2 instrument

    Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Neil Atherton Day;Stuart James Peacock;Angelo Anthony Iezzi

  • Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure.

    RoseAnne Misajon;Graeme Hawthorne;Jeffrey Ralph James Richardson;Jodi Barton

  • Allocating resources to health authorities: results and policy implications of small area analysis of use of inpatient services.

    P Smith;T A Sheldon;R A Carr-Hill;S Martin

  • Phase-specific and lifetime costs of cancer care in Ontario, Canada

    Claire de Oliveira;Reka Pataky;Karen E. Bremner;Jagadish Rangrej

  • Understanding the costs of cancer care before and after diagnosis for the 21 most common cancers in Ontario: a population-based descriptive study

    Claire de Oliveira;Karen E Bremner;Reka Pataky;Nadia Gunraj

  • A randomized controlled trial of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening: trial design and preliminary results (HPV FOCAL Trial)

    Gina S Ogilvie;Gina S Ogilvie;Dirk J van Niekerk;Dirk J van Niekerk;Mel Krajden;Ruth E Martin

  • Australian utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30

    Madeleine T. King;Rosalie Viney;A. Simon Pickard;Donna Rowen

  • The economic burden of cancer care in Canada: a population-based cost study

    Claire de Oliveira;Sharada Weir;Jagadish Rangrej;Murray D Krahn

  • Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods.

    Stuart Peacock;Craig Mitton;Craig Mitton;Angela Bate;Bonnie McCoy

  • Primary cervical cancer screening with HPV testing compared with liquid-based cytology: results of round 1 of a randomised controlled trial – the HPV FOCAL Study

    G S Ogilvie;G S Ogilvie;M Krajden;M Krajden;D J van Niekerk;D J van Niekerk;R E Martin

  • HPV for cervical cancer screening (HPV FOCAL): Complete Round 1 results of a randomized trial comparing HPV-based primary screening to liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer

    Gina S. Ogilvie;Mel Krajden;Dirk van Niekerk;Laurie W. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff Richardson
Jeff Richardson Monash University
Craig Mitton
Craig Mitton University of British Columbia
Jeffrey S. Hoch
Jeffrey S. Hoch University of California, Davis
Mel Krajden
Mel Krajden University of British Columbia
Eduardo L. Franco
Eduardo L. Franco McGill University
Madeleine King
Madeleine King University of Sydney
Cam Donaldson
Cam Donaldson Glasgow Caledonian University
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Natasha B. Leighl
Natasha B. Leighl Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Donna Rowen
Donna Rowen University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in social sciences and humanities opens up diverse opportunities in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students are now choosing flexible online programs that fit their schedules while also providing rigorous, accredited training.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed counselor, consider the cacrep-accredited programs online. These programs meet high professional standards and prepare graduates for clinical practice. Those drawn to helping families and couples may opt for mft programs, which focus on marriage and family therapy.

For broader career options in mental health, research an accredited online psychology degree. Psychology graduates work in counseling, research, HR, or education. Aspiring social workers can pursue recognized masters in social work online programs that provide core skills for community service, advocacy, and clinical work.

These online pathways can lead to rewarding careers that make a real difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Peacock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles