World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1567 1404 60 57 175 13638

Rob Baltussen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rob Baltussen between 1996 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rob Baltussen published across 29 years, from 1996 to 2024, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 5 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications
1996 2024

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rob Baltussen: publications per year, 1996 to 2024
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 6
2001 1
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 6
2006 16
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 11
2012 20
2013 15
2014 9
2015 5
2016 9
2017 13
2018 5
2019 5
2020 6
2021 6
2022 5
2023 3
2024 2
Total 182
Download as CSV

Rob Baltussen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob Baltussen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 175
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rob Baltussen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob Baltussen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Rob Baltussen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Health Professions. The subfields covered include Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Finance, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main topics of their work focus on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life; Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology; Healthcare Systems and Reforms; Healthcare cost, quality, and practices; Healthcare Policy and Management; Global Maternal and Child Health; and Health Policy Implementation Science.

Rob Baltussen has published extensively, with a significant number of papers appearing in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Journal of Dental Research
  • Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Baltussen exemplify their research interests and include:

  • "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design − Part I: Conceptual Framework" (2021), International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide" (2021), International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • "Development of the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: an overview of systematic reviews of decision criteria for health decision-making" (2020), Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
  • "Exploring the economic impact of inappropriate antibiotic use: the case of upper respiratory tract infections in Ghana" (2022), Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
  • "Evidence-Informed Oral Health Policy Making: Opportunities and Challenges" (2023), Journal of Dental Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include Maarten Jansen, Anna Vassall, Wija Oortwijn, Gavin Surgey, and Maryam Huda. These co-authors have contributed to multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships across topics related to health policy and economics.

Best Publications

  • Priority Setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis

    Rob Baltussen;Louis Wilhelmus Niessen

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

    Praveen Thokala;Nancy Devlin;Kevin Marsh;Rob Baltussen

  • Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Christopher J.L. Murray;David B. Evans;Arnab Acharya;Rob M.P.M. Baltussen

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making—Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force

    Kevin Marsh;Maarten IJzerman;Praveen Thokala;Rob Baltussen

  • Programme costs in the economic evaluation of health interventions.

    Benjamin Johns;Rob Baltussen;Raymond Hutubessy

  • The impact of health insurance in Africa and Asia: a systematic review

    Ernst Spaan;Judith Mathijssen;Noor Tromp;Florence McBain

  • Equity aspects of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: Who is enrolling, who is not and why?

    Caroline Jehu-Appiah;Genevieve Aryeetey;Ernst Spaan;Thomas de Hoop

  • Perceived quality of care of primary health care services in Burkina Faso

    R M P M Baltussen;Y Yé;S Haddad;R S Sauerborn

  • Iron Fortification and Iron Supplementation are Cost-Effective Interventions to Reduce Iron Deficiency in Four Subregions of the World

    Rob Baltussen;Cécile Knai;Mona Sharan

  • Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries.

    Daniel R Hogan;Rob Baltussen;Chika Hayashi;Jeremy A Lauer

  • From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking

    Lalla Aïda Guindo;Monika Wagner;Rob Baltussen;Donna Rindress

  • Household perceptions and their implications for enrolment in the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana

    Caroline Jehu-Appiah;Genevieve Aryeetey;Irene Agyepong;Ernst Spaan

  • Barriers to access to antiretroviral treatment in developing countries: a review

    Mariana Posse;Filip Meheus;Henri van Asten;Andre van der Ven

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of cataract surgery: a global and regional analysis

    Rob Baltussen;Mariame Sylla;Silvio P. Mariotti

  • Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana

    Rob Baltussen;Elly Stolk;Dan Chisholm;Moses Kweku Aikins

  • Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for tuberculosis control in developing countries

    Rob Baltussen;Katherine Floyd;Christopher Dye

  • The impact of antiretroviral treatment on the age composition of the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa

    Jan A.C. Hontelez;Sake J. de Vlas;Rob Baltussen;Marie-Louise Newell

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Vaccination of Older People: A Study in 5 Western European Countries

    A. Ament;R. Baltussen;R. Baltussen;G. Duru;C. Rigaud-Bully

  • The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective.

    Eva Annette Rehfuess;Jan M. Stratil;Inger B. Scheel;Anayda Portela

  • Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

    Ole Frithjof Norheim;Rob Baltussen;Mira Johri;Dan Chisholm

  • Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Including Health Interventions in the Universal Health Coverage Benefit Package in Thailand

    Sitaporn Youngkong;Rob Baltussen;Sripen Tantivess;Adun Mohara

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis W. Niessen
Louis W. Niessen Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Till Bärnighausen
Till Bärnighausen Heidelberg University
Irene Akua Agyepong
Irene Akua Agyepong University of Ghana
Raymond Hutubessy
Raymond Hutubessy World Health Organization
Marie-Louise Newell
Marie-Louise Newell University of Southampton
Frank Tanser
Frank Tanser University of Lincoln
Sake J. de Vlas
Sake J. de Vlas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mark N. Lurie
Mark N. Lurie Brown University
Ole Frithjof Norheim
Ole Frithjof Norheim University of Bergen
Reinout van Crevel
Reinout van Crevel Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities unlocks diverse career options. Key issues students often weigh include program affordability, duration, and real-world applicability. For example, those pursuing social work can find cheap msw programs online for a budget-friendly yet accredited path to this in-demand field. Accelerated formats are another consideration—options like accelerated social work programs allow you to enter the workforce faster without sacrificing educational quality.

For those with an interest in behavioral analysis, specialized online master’s programs are growing in availability. There are now several bcba online masters programs that focus on affordability and flexibility for working professionals. If you’re passionate about psychology but looking for a quicker path, online options include some of the quickest psychology degree programs available.

By comparing program features—length, cost, accreditation, and career alignment—you can choose an online degree to fit your personal and professional goals in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Rob Baltussen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles