World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Manuela De Allegri

Manuela De Allegri

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3443 3171 92 81 197 7608

Manuela De Allegri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manuela De Allegri between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manuela De Allegri published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2022. 34 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manuela De Allegri: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 6
2007 7
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 7
2012 4
2013 4
2014 9
2015 15
2016 7
2017 14
2018 14
2019 18
2020 23
2021 15
2022 34
2023 20
2024 24
2025 33
2026 1
Total 269
Download as CSV

Manuela De Allegri publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela De Allegri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 197 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 197
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Manuela De Allegri D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuela De Allegri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Manuela De Allegri is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has an extensive publication record spanning fields such as Medicine and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Their research primarily focuses on Global Maternal and Child Health, Healthcare Systems and Reforms, and Global Health Care Issues.

De Allegri's work covers a range of topics including Healthcare Policy and Management, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Child Nutrition and Water Access, as well as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research. The diverse thematic coverage reflects an interdisciplinary approach incorporating pediatrics, general health professions, infectious diseases, and finance within health systems research.

Frequent venues for De Allegri's publications include Health Policy and Planning and BMJ Global Health, with ten papers each, followed by Research Square with eight publications, BMC Health Services Research, and PLOS Global Public Health, each with six publications. This distribution highlights active contributions to global health and policy-oriented journals.

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors. Notable frequent collaborators include Julia Lohmann (34 coauthored works), Stephan Brenner (31), Valéry Ridde (30), Hoa Thi Nguyen (21), and Emmanuel Bonnet (21), indicating sustained partnerships within their research network.

Important recent publications illustrate the breadth of De Allegri's research. These include:

  • "Factors influencing variation in implementation outcomes of the redesigned community health fund in the Dodoma region of Tanzania: a mixed-methods study," 2021, BMC Public Health
  • "Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment," 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • "Determinants of healthcare seeking and out-of-pocket expenditures in a 'free' healthcare system: evidence from rural Malawi," 2020, Health Economics Review
  • "Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial," 2021, Trials
  • "Examining the relationship between armed conflict and coverage of maternal and child health services in 35 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a geospatial analysis," 2023, The Lancet Global Health

Best Publications

  • A scoping review on determinants of unmet need for family planning among women of reproductive age in low and middle income countries

    Joseph K. Wulifan;Joseph K. Wulifan;Stephan Brenner;Albrecht Jahn;Manuela De Allegri

  • Determinants of utilisation of maternal care services after the reduction of user fees: A case study from rural Burkina Faso

    Manuela De Allegri;Valéry Ridde;Valérie R. Louis;Malabika Sarker

  • Drop-out analysis of community-based health insurance membership at Nouna, Burkina Faso.

    Hengjin Dong;Manuela De Allegri;Devendra Gnawali;Aurélia Souares

  • Understanding enrolment in community health insurance in sub-Saharan Africa: a population-based case-control study in rural Burkina Faso

    Manuela De Allegri;Bocar Kouyaté;Heiko Becher;Adjima Gbangou

  • The effect of community-based health insurance on the utilization of modern health care services: evidence from Burkina Faso.

    Devendra Prasad Gnawali;Subhash Pokhrel;Ali Sié;Mamadou Sanon

  • Malaria in rural Burkina Faso: local illness concepts, patterns of traditional treatment and influence on health-seeking behaviour.

    Claudia Beiersmann;Aboubakary Sanou;Evelyn Wladarsch;Manuela De Allegri

  • Understanding consumers’ preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa

    Manuela De Allegri;Mamadou Sanon;John Bridges;Rainer Sauerborn

  • "To enrol or not to enrol?": A qualitative investigation of demand for health insurance in rural West Africa.

    Manuela De Allegri;Mamadou Sanon;Rainer Sauerborn

  • Universal health coverage from multiple perspectives: a synthesis of conceptual literature and global debates

    Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Manuela De Allegri

  • Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: A qualitative study in rural communities

    Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Grace Bongololo Mbera;Manuela De Allegri

  • Maternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies

    Jobiba Chinkhumba;Jobiba Chinkhumba;Manuela De Allegri;Adamson S Muula;Bjarne Robberstad

  • Community health insurance in sub-Saharan Africa: what operational difficulties hamper its successful development?

    Manuela De Allegri;Rainer Sauerborn;Bocar Kouyaté;Steffen Flessa

  • Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi

    Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro;Gerald Leppert;Grace Bongololo Mbera;Paul Jacob Robyn

  • Compliance of young children with ITN protection in rural Burkina Faso

    Claudia Frey;Corneille Traoré;Manuela De Allegri;Bocar Kouyaté

  • Does performance-based financing increase value for money in low- and middle- income countries? A systematic review

    Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay;Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay;Jessica Spagnolo;Jessica Spagnolo;Manuela De Allegri;Valéry Ridde;Valéry Ridde

  • The Impact of Health Insurance Programs on Out-of-Pocket Expenditures in Indonesia: An Increase or a Decrease?

    Budi Aji;Manuela De Allegri;Aurelia Souares;Rainer Sauerborn

  • The great failure of malaria control in Africa: a district perspective from Burkina Faso.

    Bocar Kouyaté;Ali Sie;Maurice Yé;Manuela De Allegri

  • Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies

    Audrey Prost;Ariella Binik;Ibrahim Abubakar;Anjana Roy

  • Quality of antenatal care in rural southern Tanzania: a reality check

    Malabika Sarker;Gerhard Schmid;Elin C. Larsson;Sylvia Kirenga

  • Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: An application to the study of the impact of community health insurance

    Manuela De Allegri;Subhash Pokhrel;Heiko Becher;Hengjin Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Valéry Ridde
Valéry Ridde Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Adamson S. Muula
Adamson S. Muula University of Malawi
Rainer Sauerborn
Rainer Sauerborn University Hospital Heidelberg
Till Bärnighausen
Till Bärnighausen Heidelberg University
John F. P. Bridges
John F. P. Bridges The Ohio State University
Jale Tosun
Jale Tosun Heidelberg University
Hans-Georg Kräusslich
Hans-Georg Kräusslich Heidelberg University
Michael Knop
Michael Knop Heidelberg University
Joanna Coast
Joanna Coast University of Bristol
Shafiu Mohammed
Shafiu Mohammed Ahmadu Bello University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to several rewarding online degree options. Many students find that flexible learning formats allow them to balance studies with existing commitments, leading to greater accessibility and affordability.

For those interested in counseling, consider the best online cacrep counseling programs, which focus on developing professional expertise and meeting accreditation standards. If helping families appeals to you, marriage and family masters programs offer specialized training to address complex interpersonal dynamics.

Psychology remains a popular path, with many online degrees for psychology providing the foundational knowledge and research skills needed to pursue diverse roles in education, healthcare, and business. Those motivated to advocate for social change might consider the masters in social work, preparing graduates for crucial roles in communities, clinical settings, and policy organizations.

Each route offers distinct career pathways and the flexibility of online study, making them excellent choices for students passionate about making a difference in society.

Best Scientists Citing Manuela De Allegri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles