World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
13999
World Ranking
2705
National Ranking
1312

John F. P. Bridges publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. P. Bridges sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John F. P. Bridges D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. P. Bridges sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John F. P. Bridges is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their primary research falls within the broad field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

Their recent research output includes papers published in various academic venues. Notable recent publications are:

  • Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Medical Decision Making
  • Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Literature Review and Content Analysis of Frameworks, 2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Analysis of Patient Preferences in Lung Cancer - Estimating Acceptable Tradeoffs Between Treatment Benefit and Side Effects, 2020, Patient Preference and Adherence
  • Best-Worst Scaling and the Prioritization of Objects in Health: A Systematic Review, 2022, PharmacoEconomics

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John F. P. Bridges include:

  • Norah L. Crossnohere
  • Nicola B. Campoamor
  • Ellen Janssen
  • Daniel R. Richardson
  • Mohamed I. Elsaid

Regarding publication venues, John F. P. Bridges has commonly published in:

  • Patient
  • Value in Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Medical Decision Making

Best Publications

  • Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

    John F.P. Bridges;A. Brett Hauber;Deborah Marshall;Andrew Lloyd

  • Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force

    F Reed Johnson;Emily Jane Lancsar;Deborah A Marshall;Vikram Kilambi

  • Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force

    A. Brett Hauber;Juan Marcos Gonzalez;Catharina Gerarda Maria Groothuis-Oudshoorn;Thomas Prior

  • Globalization and healthcare: understanding health and medical tourism

    Percivil M. Carrera;John F.P. Bridges

  • Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are Studies being Designed and Reported?: An Update on Current Practice in the Published Literature between 2005 and 2008.

    Deborah Marshall;Deborah Marshall;John F. P. Bridges;Brett Hauber;Ruthanne Cameron

  • Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future

    John F. P. Bridges;Christopher Jones

  • Using Best–Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health Care

    Kei Long Cheung;Ben F. M. Wijnen;Ilene L. Hollin;Ellen M. Janssen

  • Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics.

    John F P Bridges

  • Understanding consumers’ preferences and decision to enrol in community-based health insurance in rural West Africa

    Manuela De Allegri;Mamadou Sanon;John Bridges;Rainer Sauerborn

  • Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis

    John F.P. Bridges;Ateesha F. Mohamed;Henrik W. Finnern;Anette Woehl

  • Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.

    John F P Bridges;Elizabeth T Kinter;Lillian Kidane;Rebekah R Heinzen

  • Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients

    John F.P. Bridges;John F.P. Bridges;Elizabeth T. Kinter;Lillian Kidane;Rebekah R. Heinzen

  • Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review

    Rubén E Mújica Mota;Rosanna Tarricone;Oriana Ciani;John F P Bridges

  • Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.

    Mo Zhou;Winter Maxwell Thayer;John F. P. Bridges

  • Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

    Susan M Joy;Emily Little;Nisa M Maruthur;Tanjala S Purnell

  • Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure

    G. Nichol;P. Kaul;E. Huszti;J.F.P. Bridges

  • Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment : Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA

    Finn Børlum Kristensen;Don Husereau;Don Husereau;Mirjana Huić;Michael Drummond

  • Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?

    Ellen M Janssen;Deborah A Marshall;A Brett Hauber;John F P Bridges

  • Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis:

    Holly O. Witteman;Ruth Ndjaboue;Gratianne Vaisson;Selma Chipenda Dansokho

  • A Community-Engaged Approach to Quantifying Caregiver Preferences for the Benefits and Risks of Emerging Therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

    Holly L. Peay;Ilene Hollin;Ryan Fischer;John F.P. Bridges

  • Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: a tutorial.

    J. Marjan Hummel;John F. P. Bridges;John F. P. Bridges;Maarten J. IJzerman

  • Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: An application to the study of the impact of community health insurance

    Manuela De Allegri;Subhash Pokhrel;Heiko Becher;Hengjin Dong

  • Accounting for Tastes

    Florian Vogt;David L. B. Schwappach;John F. P. Bridges

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis W. Niessen
Louis W. Niessen Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Kevin D. Frick
Kevin D. Frick Johns Hopkins University
Jodi B. Segal
Jodi B. Segal Johns Hopkins University
Timothy M. Pawlik
Timothy M. Pawlik The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Susan dosReis
Susan dosReis University of Maryland, Baltimore
F. Reed Johnson
F. Reed Johnson Duke University
Dorry L. Segev
Dorry L. Segev Johns Hopkins University
Terry N. Flynn
Terry N. Flynn University of Nottingham
Charles E. Cunningham
Charles E. Cunningham McMaster University
Manuela De Allegri
Manuela De Allegri Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities offers flexibility for working professionals and students aiming for diverse career paths. Popular online programs include psychology, education, and marriage & family therapy, each with unique advantages and requirements.

For those interested in a clinical psychology career, psyd online programs prepare graduates for licensure and hands-on practice. If you wish for a role in couples or family counseling, the best online mft programs offer streamlined pathways to become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist.

Affordability is a key concern for many prospective students. Options like the cheapest online master's in psychology make it possible to earn a valuable credential without excessive student debt. Additionally, educators and career switchers can benefit from accelerated doctoral programs in education online, which allow for quicker advancement into leadership roles.

Whether you are seeking to advance your current career or pivot into a new field, these online programs provide accessible and reputable routes to gain new skills and professional qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing John F. P. Bridges

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles