World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6168 5728 441 425 107 7583

Adam G. Elshaug publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam G. Elshaug between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam G. Elshaug published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2012. 10 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2012. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
2005 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam G. Elshaug: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 4
2011 4
2012 19
2013 11
2014 4
2015 7
2016 2
2017 10
2018 9
2019 13
2020 5
2021 12
2022 5
2023 2
2024 3
2025 7
Total 126
Download as CSV

Adam G. Elshaug publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam G. Elshaug sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 107 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 107
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam G. Elshaug D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam G. Elshaug sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam G. Elshaug is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with a focus on subfields such as General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers a range of topics including Healthcare cost, quality, practices, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare Policy and Management, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Healthcare Systems and Challenges, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues.

Recent publications include:

  • Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys (2020) - BMJ
  • Assessment of Overuse of Medical Tests and Treatments at US Hospitals Using Medicare Claims (2021) - JAMA Network Open
  • Low value care is a health hazard that calls for patient empowerment (2021) - The Medical Journal of Australia
  • To Expand the Evidence Base About Harms from Tests and Treatments (2021) - Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Overcoming silos in health care systems through meso-level organisations - a case study of health reforms in New South Wales, Australia (2024) - The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Kelsey Chalmers
  • Bruce E. Landon
  • Sallie-Anne Pearson
  • Valérie Gopinath
  • Susan J. Méndez

Elshaug's research has been published in various venues, with multiple contributions to the Australian Health Review, JAMA Network Open, The Medical Journal of Australia, Internal Medicine Journal, and BMJ.

Best Publications

  • Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world

    Shannon Brownlee;Kalipso Chalkidou;Jenny Doust;Adam G Elshaug

  • Measuring Low-Value Care in Medicare

    Aaron L. Schwartz;Bruce E. Landon;Bruce E. Landon;Adam G. Elshaug;Michael E. Chernew

  • A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication

    Victoria A Wade;Jonathan Karnon;Adam G Elshaug;Janet E Hiller

  • Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care

    Adam G Elshaug;Meredith B Rosenthal;John N Lavis;John N Lavis;Shannon Brownlee

  • Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world

    Paul Glasziou;Sharon Straus;Shannon Brownlee;Lyndal J. Trevena

  • The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review.

    Lisa Ann Baumann;Jannah Baker;Adam G. Elshaug

  • Drivers of poor medical care

    Vikas Saini;Sandra Garcia-Armesto;David Klemperer;Valerie Paris

  • Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study.

    Adam G Elshaug;Adam G Elshaug;Adam G Elshaug;Amber M Watt;Linda Mundy;Cameron D Willis;Cameron D Willis

  • Care for low back pain: can health systems deliver?

    Adrian C Traeger;Rachelle Buchbinder;Adam G Elshaug;Peter R Croft

  • Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices

    Adam G Elshaug;Janet E Hiller;Sean R Tunis;John R Moss

  • Redefining success in airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a meta analysis and synthesis of the evidence.

    Adam G Elshaug;John R Moss;Anne Marie Southcott;Janet E Hiller

  • Setting a research agenda for medical overuse

    Daniel J Morgan;Shannon Brownlee;Aaron L Leppin;Nancy Kressin

  • Addressing overuse and underuse around the world

    Vikas Saini;Shannon Brownlee;Adam G Elshaug;Paul Glasziou

  • Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care

    R Sacha Bhatia;Wendy Levinson;Samuel Shortt;Ciara Pendrith

  • Identifying existing health care services that do not provide value for money

    Adam G Elshaug;John R Moss;Peter Littlejohns;Jonathan Karnon

  • High Cancer Drug Prices in the United States: Reasons and Proposed Solutions

    Hagop Kantarjian;David Steensma;Judit Rius Sanjuan;Adam Elshaug

  • The Value of Low-Value Lists

    Adam G. Elshaug;J. Michael McWilliams;Bruce E. Landon

  • Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices.

    Adam G. Elshaug;Janet E. Hiller;John R. Moss

  • Disinvestment and value-based purchasing strategies for pharmaceuticals: an international review

    Bonny Parkinson;Catherine Sermet;Fiona Clement;Steffan Crausaz

  • Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value care

    Ian A Scott;Jason Soon;Adam G Elshaug;Robyn Lindner

  • Developing indicators for measuring low-value care: mapping Choosing Wisely recommendations to hospital data

    Kelsey Chalmers;Kelsey Chalmers;Tim Badgery-Parker;Tim Badgery-Parker;Sallie-Anne Pearson;Jonathan Brett

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig I Coleman
Craig I Coleman University of Connecticut
Bruce E. Landon
Bruce E. Landon Harvard University
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Peter Littlejohns
Peter Littlejohns King's College London
J. Michael McWilliams
J. Michael McWilliams Brigham and Women's Hospital
Yot Teerawattananon
Yot Teerawattananon Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program
John N. Lavis
John N. Lavis McMaster University
Lyndal Trevena
Lyndal Trevena University of Sydney
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to numerous fields, from counseling to academia. Many students are now choosing flexible learning routes, taking advantage of online education. For those aspiring to become clinical psychologists, an online psyd program delivers rigorous training and licensure pathways, allowing you to balance studies with professional or personal commitments.

Students interested in marriage and family therapy will find mft programs online designed to fit both fast-tracked and traditional study timelines. For broader mental health roles, consider earning an MA or MS through one of the online psychology masters programs, which offer both affordability and strong academic foundations.

If you’re drawn to leadership or education policy, fast-paced programs like the shortest edd program online let you advance your qualifications without putting your life on hold. Each pathway offers its own career possibilities, making it easier than ever to find the best fit for your goals in the U.S. social sciences and humanities landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Adam G. Elshaug

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles