World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
19483
World Ranking
19410
National Ranking
9668

Craig I Coleman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig I Coleman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,109 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Craig I Coleman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig I Coleman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Diabetes mellitus

His primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Meta-analysis, Randomized controlled trial, Atrial fibrillation and Confidence interval. His Internal medicine study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Diabetes mellitus, Endocrinology, Surgery and Cardiology. His Meta-analysis study incorporates themes from Gastroenterology, Odds, MEDLINE and Intensive care medicine.

His study in Randomized controlled trial is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Adverse effect, Placebo, Clinical trial and Physical therapy. His Atrial fibrillation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Cardiac surgery and Anesthesia. The concepts of his Confidence interval study are interwoven with issues in Myocardial perfusion imaging, Single-photon emission computed tomography, Nuclear medicine, Cardiac PET and Stenosis.

His most cited work include:

  • Statins and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. (503 citations)
  • Effect of Noninsulin Antidiabetic Drugs Added to Metformin Therapy on Glycemic Control, Weight Gain, and Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (405 citations)
  • Meta-Analysis to Assess the Quality of Warfarin Control in Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States (332 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Internal medicine, In patient, Surgery, Cardiology and Anesthesia. His study in Atrial fibrillation, Myocardial infarction, Randomized controlled trial, Rivaroxaban and Warfarin is done as part of Internal medicine. His Atrial fibrillation research incorporates themes from Stroke, Odds ratio, Cardiothoracic surgery and Intensive care medicine.

In Randomized controlled trial, Craig I Coleman works on issues like Meta-analysis, which are connected to Confidence interval. His study looks at the relationship between Surgery and topics such as Strength of evidence, which overlap with Adverse outcomes. His Anesthesia research incorporates elements of Pulmonary embolism and Placebo.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (55.03%)
  • In patient (37.16%)
  • Surgery (35.07%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (55.03%)
  • Rivaroxaban (14.68%)
  • Atrial fibrillation (21.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Craig I Coleman mainly investigates Internal medicine, Rivaroxaban, Atrial fibrillation, Warfarin and Pulmonary embolism. His Internal medicine study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Cardiology. His research investigates the connection between Rivaroxaban and topics such as Discontinuation that intersect with problems in Risk factor.

His biological study deals with issues like Stroke, which deal with fields such as Subgroup analysis. His work deals with themes such as Anesthesia and Surgery, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Hemodialysis, which intersect with Warfarin. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Confidence interval, Randomized controlled trial and MEDLINE is strongly linked to Meta-analysis.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Association of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β-Agonists as Controller and Quick Relief Therapy With Exacerbations and Symptom Control in Persistent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (96 citations)
  • Real-world evidence of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States: the REVISIT-US study (69 citations)
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (59 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Diabetes mellitus

His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Rivaroxaban, Atrial fibrillation, Warfarin and Cardiology. His work on Propensity score matching, Randomized controlled trial, Confidence interval and Meta-analysis as part of general Internal medicine research is frequently linked to In patient, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Randomized controlled trial research includes themes of Relative risk and Medical prescription.

His Meta-analysis study incorporates themes from Epidemiology and MEDLINE. His Rivaroxaban research incorporates elements of Venous thromboembolism, Emergency department, Emergency medicine, Anticoagulant and Pulmonary embolism. As part of the same scientific family, Craig I Coleman usually focuses on Atrial fibrillation, concentrating on Stroke and intersecting with Subgroup analysis.

Best Publications

  • Statins and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

    Krista M. Dale;Craig I. Coleman;Nickole N. Henyan;Jeffrey Kluger

  • Effect of Noninsulin Antidiabetic Drugs Added to Metformin Therapy on Glycemic Control, Weight Gain, and Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes

    Olivia J. Phung;Jennifer M. Scholle;Mehak Talwar;Craig I. Coleman

  • Meta-Analysis to Assess the Quality of Warfarin Control in Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States

    William L. Baker;Deborah A. Cios;Stephen D. Sander;Craig I. Coleman

  • Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease

    Craig I. Coleman;Brendan Limone;Diana M. Sobieraj;Soyon Lee

  • Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.

    W. L. Baker;C. Michael White;C. Michael White;J. C. Cappelleri;J. Kluger;J. Kluger

  • Cinnamon use in type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Robert W. Allen;Emmanuelle Schwartzman;Emmanuelle Schwartzman;William L. Baker;Craig I. Coleman

  • Evaluation of echinacea for the prevention and treatment of the common cold: a meta-analysis

    Sachin A Shah;Sachin A Shah;Stephen Sander;Stephen Sander;C Michael White;C Michael White;Mike Rinaldi;Mike Rinaldi

  • Association of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β-Agonists as Controller and Quick Relief Therapy With Exacerbations and Symptom Control in Persistent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Diana M. Sobieraj;Erin R. Weeda;Elaine Nguyen;Craig I. Coleman

  • Real-World Comparative Effectiveness And Safety Of Rivaroxaban And Warfarin In Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

    F. Laliberté;M. Cloutier;W.W. Nelson;C.I. Coleman

  • Effect of glucomannan on plasma lipid and glucose concentrations, body weight, and blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nitesh Sood;William L Baker;Craig I Coleman

  • The impact of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes.

    Effie L. Gillespie;C. Michael White;Michael Kardas;Michael Lindberg

  • Effect of green tea catechins with or without caffeine on anthropometric measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Olivia J Phung;William L Baker;Leslie J Matthews;Michael Lanosa

  • Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis.

    Matthew W. Parker;Aline Iskandar;Brendan Limone;Andrew Perugini

  • Differing effect of statins on insulin sensitivity in non-diabetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    William L. Baker;William L. Baker;Ripple Talati;Ripple Talati;C. Michael White;C. Michael White;Craig I. Coleman;Craig I. Coleman

  • Effects of Garlic on Blood Pressure in Patients With and Without Systolic Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

    Kurt M Reinhart;Craig I Coleman;Colleen Teevan;Payai Vachhani

  • The impact of coenzyme Q10 on systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure.

    Stephen Sander;Stephen Sander;Craig I. Coleman;Craig I. Coleman;Aarti A. Patel;Aarti A. Patel;Jeffrey Kluger

  • Green Tea Catechins Decrease Total and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Amie Kim;Andrew Chiu;Meredith K. Barone;Diane Avino

  • Impact of inappropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infection: a meta-analysis.

    Effie L. Kuti;Aarti A. Patel;Aarti A. Patel;Craig I. Coleman;Craig I. Coleman

  • Effect of Cinnamon on Glucose Control and Lipid Parameters

    William L. Baker;Gabriela Gutierrez-Williams;C. Michael White;Jeffrey Kluger

  • The Effect of Grape Seed Extract on Cardiovascular Risk Markers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Harm H.H. Feringa;Dayne A. Laskey;Justine E. Dickson;Craig I. Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam G. Elshaug
Adam G. Elshaug University of Melbourne
Thomas A Trikalinos
Thomas A Trikalinos Brown University
Lauren E. Griffith
Lauren E. Griffith McMaster University
Alexander G.G. Turpie
Alexander G.G. Turpie McMaster University
Gary H. Lyman
Gary H. Lyman Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Philip S. Wells
Philip S. Wells Ottawa Hospital
Eric B. Bass
Eric B. Bass Johns Hopkins University
Roger Chou
Roger Chou Oregon Health & Science University
Abbas Mirshafiey
Abbas Mirshafiey Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Mondher Toumi
Mondher Toumi Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and flexible career paths in healthcare. For those interested in nutrition, earning a nutrition bachelor degree online can help develop an evidence-based understanding of diet and wellness without needing to attend in-person classes.

Seeking leadership roles? Consider the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited to gain the credentials needed for healthcare management positions. Nurses looking to advance their qualifications quickly can enroll in the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, which provide flexibility for working professionals.

For those aiming for the highest level of clinical practice, the quickest dnp program can offer an accelerated pathway to become a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These online options allow you to tailor your education to fit your existing commitments, making advanced healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Craig I Coleman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles