World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 58 13168 12113 496 461 231 12093

Ghislaine Scelo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ghislaine Scelo between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ghislaine Scelo published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 83 publications in 2023. 26 of the 290 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 83. Peak 83 publications in 2023. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 83 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 16 publications
2003 2025

290 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ghislaine Scelo: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 7
2008 5
2009 1
2010 7
2011 8
2012 7
2013 3
2014 10
2015 9
2016 15
2017 23
2018 15
2019 17
2020 20
2021 16
2022 8
2023 83
2024 10
2025 16
Total 290
Download as CSV

Ghislaine Scelo publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ghislaine Scelo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 227–236 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651 231
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Ghislaine Scelo D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ghislaine Scelo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253 58
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ghislaine Scelo is affiliated with the International Agency For Research On Cancer in France. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, Genetics, and Physiology. These areas align with a range of topics central to their publications and investigations.

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Respiratory and Cough-Related Research

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Ghislaine Scelo include:

  • "Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults" (2024), American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update" (2022), European Urology
  • "Mutational signatures in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from eight countries with varying incidence" (2021), Nature Genetics
  • "Assessment of polygenic architecture and risk prediction based on common variants across fourteen cancers" (2020), Nature Communications
  • "Urinary TERT promoter mutations are detectable up to 10 years prior to clinical diagnosis of bladder cancer: Evidence from the Golestan Cohort Study" (2020), EBioMedicine

Ghislaine Scelo frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, reflecting interdisciplinary and international cooperation. These frequent coauthors include Paul Brennan, James McKay, Ivana Holcátová, Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani, and Давид Заридзе.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in several key venues, including:

  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications
  • Cancer Research

The volume of publications across these journals highlights a sustained contribution to cancer research, respiratory medicine, and genetics. Their focus on diseases such as renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and asthma connects multiple aspects of molecular biology and clinical epidemiology.

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Large-scale association analysis identifies new lung cancer susceptibility loci and heterogeneity in genetic susceptibility across histological subtypes

    James D McKay;Rayjean J Hung;Younghun Han;Xuchen Zong

  • Obesity, metabolic factors and risk of different histological types of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

    Robert Carreras-Torres;Mattias Johansson;Philip C. Haycock;Kaitlin H. Wade

  • Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases A Mendelian Randomization Study

    Philip C Haycock;Stephen Burgess;Aayah Nounu

  • High prevalence of mutant KRAS in circulating exosome-derived DNA from early-stage pancreatic cancer patients.

    K. Allenson;J. Castillo;F. A. San Lucas;G. Scelo

  • Rare variants of large effect in BRCA2 and CHEK2 affect risk of lung cancer

    Yufei Wang;James D McKay;Thorunn Rafnar;Zhaoming Wang

  • Risk of second primary cancer among patients with head and neck cancers: a pooled analysis of 13 cancer registries

    S.C. Chuang;G. Scelo;J.M. Tonita;S. Tamaro

  • Genome-wide association study of renal cell carcinoma identifies two susceptibility loci on 2p21 and 11q13.3

    Mark P. Purdue;Mattias Johansson;Diana Zelenika;Jorge R. Toro

  • Diabetes, antidiabetic medications and pancreatic cancer risk: an analysis from the international pancreatic cancer case-control consortium

    C. Bosetti;V. Rosato;D. Li;D. Silverman

  • Risk of second cancer among women with breast cancer.

    Lene Mellemkjær;Søren Friis;Jørgen H. Olsen;Ghislaine Scélo

  • Common variation at 2p13.3, 3q29, 7p13 and 17q25.1 associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

    Erica J Childs;Evelina Mocci;Daniele Campa;Daniele Campa;Paige M Bracci

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies five new susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer.

    Alison P. Klein;Brian M. Wolpin;Harvey A. Risch;Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon

  • Second Primary Cancers in Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Multinational Record Linkage Study

    Thekkepat C. Sandeep;Mark W.J. Strachan;Rebecca M. Reynolds;David H. Brewster

  • Does solar exposure, as indicated by the non-melanoma skin cancers, protect from solid cancers: vitamin D as a possible explanation.

    Pentti Tuohimaa;Eero Pukkala;Ghislaine Scélo;Jorgen H. Olsen

  • Variation in genomic landscape of clear cell renal cell carcinoma across Europe

    Ghislaine Scelo;Yasser Riazalhosseini;Liliana Greger;Louis Letourneau

  • Identification of Circulating Tumor DNA for the Early Detection of Small-cell Lung Cancer

    Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta;Sandra Perdomo;Sandra Perdomo;Patrice Hodonou Avogbe;Noemie Leblay

  • Analysis of heritability and shared heritability based on genome-wide association studies for thirteen cancer types

    Joshua N. Sampson;William A. Wheeler;Meredith Yeager;Orestis Panagiotou

  • Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Kidney Cancer.

    Ghislaine Scelo;Tricia L. Larose

  • Geographic heterogeneity in the prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer

    Devasena Anantharaman;Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani;Daniel C. Beachler;Tarik Gheit

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Brennan
Paul Brennan International Agency For Research On Cancer
David Zaridze
David Zaridze Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin
Stephen J. Chanock
Stephen J. Chanock National Institutes of Health
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Lenka Foretova
Lenka Foretova Masaryk University
Paolo Boffetta
Paolo Boffetta Stony Brook Medicine
James McKay
James McKay International Agency For Research On Cancer
Roger L. Milne
Roger L. Milne Cancer Council Victoria
Elisabete Weiderpass
Elisabete Weiderpass International Agency For Research On Cancer
Eric J. Duell
Eric J. Duell University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Biology or Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse fields ranging from research to healthcare leadership. Many students now consider flexible online degrees as a pathway to further specialization or new careers.

For those interested in healthcare, online dnp programs without clinicals offer a route for nursing professionals looking to move into advanced roles without on-site requirements. If leadership in healthcare organizations interests you, the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs deliver management skills ideal for running hospitals, clinics, or biotech companies.

Those aiming to impact patient care through pharmacy can pursue online pharmd programs, enabling deeper expertise in pharmaceutical sciences. Alternatively, the health and wellness sector is rapidly growing, and an exercise science degree online accredited can lead to roles in sports medicine, rehabilitation, or personal training.

Exploring these online options can help you find the right fit for your interests, career goals, and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Ghislaine Scelo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles