World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1654 1530 55 51 930 114974

John W. Eikelboom publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John W. Eikelboom between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John W. Eikelboom published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 34.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 75 publications in 2012. 37 of the 1,082 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 75. Peak 75 publications in 2012. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 41 publications 2012: 75 publications 2013: 55 publications 2014: 61 publications 2015: 44 publications 2016: 56 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 70 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 69 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 67 publications 2025: 36 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

1,082 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John W. Eikelboom: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 2
1998 4
1999 9
2000 15
2001 10
2002 15
2003 22
2004 27
2005 23
2006 21
2007 28
2008 30
2009 38
2010 42
2011 41
2012 75
2013 55
2014 61
2015 44
2016 56
2017 38
2018 40
2019 70
2020 45
2021 69
2022 50
2023 45
2024 67
2025 36
2026 1
Total 1,082
Download as CSV

John W. Eikelboom publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Eikelboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 921–940 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 930 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116 930
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John W. Eikelboom D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Eikelboom sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Canada Leader Award

Overview

John W. Eikelboom is affiliated with the Population Health Research Institute in Canada and has a significant body of research within the field of Medicine, particularly in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research covers several subfields, including Internal Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Molecular Biology. Major topics addressed in their work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Inflammasome and Immune Disorders, and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Salim Yusuf
  • Stuart J. Connolly
  • Jackie Bosch
  • Deepak L. Bhatt
  • Renato D. Lópes

John W. Eikelboom has published extensively in notable medical journals. Leading venues for their work are:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-Up (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants (2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery (2022, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2021, Circulation)

Best Publications

  • Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Stuart J. Connolly;Michael D. Ezekowitz;John Eikelboom;Jonas Oldgren

  • Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium

    Roxana Mehran;Sunil V. Rao;Deepak L. Bhatt;C. Michael Gibson

  • Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

    Stuart J. Connolly;John Eikelboom;Campbell Joyner;Hans-Christoph Diener

  • Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease

    John W. Eikelboom;Stuart J. Connolly;Jackie Bosch;Gilles R. Dagenais

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;John Eikelboom;Stephan Glund

  • Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

    John W. Eikelboom;Shamir R. Mehta;Sonia S. Anand;Changchun Xie

  • Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves

    John W. Eikelboom;Stuart J. Connolly;Martina Brueckmann;Christopher B. Granger

  • Aspirin-Resistant Thromboxane Biosynthesis and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, or Cardiovascular Death in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events

    John W. Eikelboom;Jack Hirsh;Jeffrey I. Weitz;Marilyn Johnston

  • Homocysteine and vascular disease.

    G J Hankey;J W Eikelboom

  • Risk of Bleeding With 2 Doses of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Older and Younger Patients With Atrial Fibrillation An Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial

    John W. Eikelboom;Lars Wallentin;Stuart J. Connolly;Mike Ezekowitz

  • Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: An analysis of the RE-LY trial

    Lars Wallentin;Salim Yusuf;Michael D Ezekowitz;Marco Alings

  • Homocyst(e)ine and cardiovascular disease: a critical review of the epidemiologic evidence.

    John W. Eikelboom;Eva Lonn;Jacques Genest;Graeme Hankey

  • Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

    Philip Urban;Roxana Mehran;Roisin Colleran;Dominick J. Angiolillo

  • Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    S. G. Chu;R. C. Becker;P. B. Berger;D. L. Bhatt

  • Benefit of Oral Anticoagulant Over Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Depends on the Quality of International Normalized Ratio Control Achieved by Centers and Countries as Measured by Time in Therapeutic Range

    Stuart J. Connolly;Janice Pogue;John Eikelboom;Gregory Flaker

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal — Full Cohort Analysis

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;Joanne van Ryn;John W. Eikelboom

  • The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy).

    Paul A. Reilly;Thorsten Lehr;Sebastian Haertter;Stuart J. Connolly

  • Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes.

    R. Mehta;Jean-Pierre Bassand;Rafael Diaz;Estudios Clinicos Latinoamérica

  • Low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

    Stefan M. Nidorf;John W. Eikelboom;Charley A. Budgeon;Peter L. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Salim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf McMaster University
Stuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly McMaster University
Graeme J. Hankey
Graeme J. Hankey University of Western Australia
Jack Hirsh
Jack Hirsh McMaster University
Lars Wallentin
Lars Wallentin Uppsala University
Jeffrey I. Weitz
Jeffrey I. Weitz McMaster University
Robert G. Hart
Robert G. Hart Population Health Research Institute
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
Michael D. Ezekowitz
Michael D. Ezekowitz Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career advancements beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in direct patient care with a quicker route to employment, consider lpn programs that can lead to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse in as little as 12-18 months.

Mental health is a growing field, and licensed nurses may pursue the online pmhnp programs to specialize further as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, which offer flexibility and strong employment prospects.

If you are drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, the affordable healthcare administration degree online can be an excellent choice, preparing you for vital roles like healthcare manager or policy analyst. For those seeking advanced leadership roles, the cheapest mha programs online offer a cost-effective route to high-level positions in hospitals and other healthcare organizations.

These online programs provide flexible learning options while opening various career pathways in healthcare, allowing you to tailor your education to your professional goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Eikelboom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles