World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Richard J. Schwab publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard J. Schwab D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Schwab is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Molecular Biology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to advanced breast cancer therapies, breast cancer treatment studies, and the role of HER2/EGFR in cancer research. Additional areas of concentration include cancer genomics and diagnostics, cancer treatment and pharmacology, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, as well as radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial, 2021, Cancer Cell
  • Real-world data from a molecular tumor board demonstrates improved outcomes with a precision N-of-One strategy, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence-Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Cancer-cell-secreted extracellular vesicles suppress insulin secretion through miR-122 to impair systemic glucose homeostasis and contribute to tumour growth, 2022, Nature Cell Biology

Frequent collaborators in their work include Hope S. Rugo, Laura J. Esserman, Rita Nanda, Kathy S. Albain, and Douglas Yee.

Richard J. Schwab has published multiple articles in several academic venues. Most frequently, their work appears in Cancer Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, JAMA Oncology, and Nature Communications.

The pattern of publications illustrates a focus on clinical and translational research in cancer, particularly breast cancer. Their coauthor network and venue choices reflect collaborative research in oncology and related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

    Epstein Lj;Kristo D;Strollo Pj;Friedman N

  • Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

    Nancy A. Collop;W. McDowell Anderson;Brian Boehlecke;Rochelle Goldberg

  • Identification of Upper Airway Anatomic Risk Factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Richard J. Schwab;Michael Pasirstein;Robert Pierson;Adonna Mackley

  • Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls.

    R J Schwab;K B Gupta;W B Gefter;L J Metzger

  • Abnormal sleep/wake cycles and the effect of environmental noise on sleep disruption in the intensive care unit.

    Neil S. Freedman;Joost Gazendam;Lachelle Levan;Allan I. Pack

  • Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Unattended Portable Monitors in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Patients

    W. McDowell Anderson;Brian Boehlecke;David Claman

  • Dynamic Upper Airway Imaging during Awake Respiration in Normal Subjects and Patients with Sleep Disordered Breathing

    Richard J. Schwab;Warren B. Gefter;Eric A. Hoffman;Krishanu B. Gupta

  • A Survey Screen for Prediction of Apnea

    Greg Maislin;Allan I. Pack;Nancy B. Kribbs;Philip L. Smith

  • Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the Ongoing Phase 2 Adaptively Randomized I-SPY2 Trial

    Rita Nanda;Minetta C Liu;Christina Yau;Rebecca Shatsky

  • Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer

    Hope S. Rugo;Olufunmilayo I. Olopade;Angela DeMichele;Christina Yau

  • Patient perception of sleep quality and etiology of sleep disruption in the intensive care unit.

    Neil S. Freedman;Natalie Kotzer;Richard J. Schwab

  • Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature

    Kristin N. Anderson;Richard B. Schwab;Maria Elena Martinez

  • Sleep disorders during pregnancy.

    Grace W. Pien;Richard J. Schwab

  • Physical findings and the risk for obstructive Sleep apnea : The importance of oropharyngeal structures

    Joseph B. Schellenberg;Greg Maislin;Richard J. Schwab

  • Clinical Guideline for the Evaluation, Management and Long-term Care of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

    Lawrence J. Epstein;David Kristo;Patrick J. Strollo;Norman Friedman

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway structure of children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

    Raanan Arens;Joseph M. McDONOUGH;Andrew T. Costarino;Soroosh Mahboubi

  • Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer

    John W Park;Minetta C Liu;Douglas Yee;Christina Yau

  • Bench-to-bedside review: Delirium in ICU patients - importance of sleep deprivation

    Gerald L Weinhouse;Richard J Schwab;Paula L Watson;Namrata Patil

  • Sleep in the intensive care unit.

    Margaret A. Pisani;Randall S. Friese;Brian K. Gehlbach;Richard J. Schwab

  • The effect of mandibular advancement on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnoea

    Andrew S L Chan;Kate Sutherland;Kate Sutherland;Richard J Schwab;Biao Zeng;Biao Zeng;Biao Zeng

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan I. Pack
Allan I. Pack University of Pennsylvania
Greg Maislin
Greg Maislin University of Pennsylvania
Thorarinn Gislason
Thorarinn Gislason University of Iceland
Razelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock Medical College of Wisconsin
Donald A. Berry
Donald A. Berry The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Christina Yau
Christina Yau University of California, San Francisco
Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Kathy S. Albain
Kathy S. Albain Loyola University Chicago
Laura J. Esserman
Laura J. Esserman University of California, San Francisco
Douglas Yee
Douglas Yee University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees offers students flexibility while preparing for a variety of healthcare careers. Many registered nurses can advance through affordable rn to bsn online programs. These enable working professionals to further their education without leaving their jobs.

For those with a non-nursing background, direct entry msn programs offer a fast-track route into advanced nursing roles. These programs are designed for career changers who want to earn a master’s in nursing efficiently.

If you’re looking for the easiest point of entry, online adn programs can be a great option. These programs often have less competitive admissions, making them accessible for a broad range of students.

Not all healthcare careers are clinical. You can also explore opportunities in health information and administration through accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. This pathway is ideal for those interested in the business or technical side of medicine and seeking financial support for their studies.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Schwab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles