World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Richard J. Schwab publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard J. Schwab between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard J. Schwab published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2023. 5 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2023. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 2 publications
1978 2026

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard J. Schwab: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 6
2013 10
2014 14
2015 14
2016 15
2017 6
2018 5
2019 9
2020 20
2021 12
2022 4
2023 30
2024 9
2025 3
2026 2
Total 175
Download as CSV

Richard J. Schwab publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard J. Schwab D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Schwab sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard J. Schwab is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Molecular Biology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to advanced breast cancer therapies, breast cancer treatment studies, and the role of HER2/EGFR in cancer research. Additional areas of concentration include cancer genomics and diagnostics, cancer treatment and pharmacology, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, as well as radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Effect of Pembrolizumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathologic Complete Response in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial, 2021, Cancer Cell
  • Real-world data from a molecular tumor board demonstrates improved outcomes with a precision N-of-One strategy, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Association of Event-Free and Distant Recurrence-Free Survival With Individual-Level Pathologic Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stages 2 and 3 Breast Cancer, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Cancer-cell-secreted extracellular vesicles suppress insulin secretion through miR-122 to impair systemic glucose homeostasis and contribute to tumour growth, 2022, Nature Cell Biology

Frequent collaborators in their work include Hope S. Rugo, Laura J. Esserman, Rita Nanda, Kathy S. Albain, and Douglas Yee.

Richard J. Schwab has published multiple articles in several academic venues. Most frequently, their work appears in Cancer Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, JAMA Oncology, and Nature Communications.

The pattern of publications illustrates a focus on clinical and translational research in cancer, particularly breast cancer. Their coauthor network and venue choices reflect collaborative research in oncology and related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

    Epstein Lj;Kristo D;Strollo Pj;Friedman N

  • Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

    Nancy A. Collop;W. McDowell Anderson;Brian Boehlecke;Rochelle Goldberg

  • Identification of Upper Airway Anatomic Risk Factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Richard J. Schwab;Michael Pasirstein;Robert Pierson;Adonna Mackley

  • Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls.

    R J Schwab;K B Gupta;W B Gefter;L J Metzger

  • Abnormal sleep/wake cycles and the effect of environmental noise on sleep disruption in the intensive care unit.

    Neil S. Freedman;Joost Gazendam;Lachelle Levan;Allan I. Pack

  • Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Unattended Portable Monitors in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Patients

    W. McDowell Anderson;Brian Boehlecke;David Claman

  • Dynamic Upper Airway Imaging during Awake Respiration in Normal Subjects and Patients with Sleep Disordered Breathing

    Richard J. Schwab;Warren B. Gefter;Eric A. Hoffman;Krishanu B. Gupta

  • A Survey Screen for Prediction of Apnea

    Greg Maislin;Allan I. Pack;Nancy B. Kribbs;Philip L. Smith

  • Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer

    Hope S. Rugo;Olufunmilayo I. Olopade;Angela DeMichele;Christina Yau

  • Patient perception of sleep quality and etiology of sleep disruption in the intensive care unit.

    Neil S. Freedman;Natalie Kotzer;Richard J. Schwab

  • Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature

    Kristin N. Anderson;Richard B. Schwab;Maria Elena Martinez

  • Sleep disorders during pregnancy.

    Grace W. Pien;Richard J. Schwab

  • Physical findings and the risk for obstructive Sleep apnea : The importance of oropharyngeal structures

    Joseph B. Schellenberg;Greg Maislin;Richard J. Schwab

  • Clinical Guideline for the Evaluation, Management and Long-term Care of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

    Lawrence J. Epstein;David Kristo;Patrick J. Strollo;Norman Friedman

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway structure of children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

    Raanan Arens;Joseph M. McDONOUGH;Andrew T. Costarino;Soroosh Mahboubi

  • Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer

    John W Park;Minetta C Liu;Douglas Yee;Christina Yau

  • Bench-to-bedside review: Delirium in ICU patients - importance of sleep deprivation

    Gerald L Weinhouse;Richard J Schwab;Paula L Watson;Namrata Patil

  • Sleep in the intensive care unit.

    Margaret A. Pisani;Randall S. Friese;Brian K. Gehlbach;Richard J. Schwab

  • The effect of mandibular advancement on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnoea

    Andrew S L Chan;Kate Sutherland;Kate Sutherland;Richard J Schwab;Biao Zeng;Biao Zeng;Biao Zeng

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan I. Pack
Allan I. Pack University of Pennsylvania
Greg Maislin
Greg Maislin University of Pennsylvania
Thorarinn Gislason
Thorarinn Gislason University of Iceland
Razelle Kurzrock
Razelle Kurzrock Medical College of Wisconsin
Donald A. Berry
Donald A. Berry The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Christina Yau
Christina Yau University of California, San Francisco
Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Kathy S. Albain
Kathy S. Albain Loyola University Chicago
Laura J. Esserman
Laura J. Esserman University of California, San Francisco
Douglas Yee
Douglas Yee University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees offers students flexibility while preparing for a variety of healthcare careers. Many registered nurses can advance through affordable rn to bsn online programs. These enable working professionals to further their education without leaving their jobs.

For those with a non-nursing background, direct entry msn programs offer a fast-track route into advanced nursing roles. These programs are designed for career changers who want to earn a master’s in nursing efficiently.

If you’re looking for the easiest point of entry, online adn programs can be a great option. These programs often have less competitive admissions, making them accessible for a broad range of students.

Not all healthcare careers are clinical. You can also explore opportunities in health information and administration through accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. This pathway is ideal for those interested in the business or technical side of medicine and seeking financial support for their studies.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Schwab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles