World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
7998
World Ranking
6225
National Ranking
2717

Adam C. Puche publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam C. Puche sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 139 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam C. Puche D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam C. Puche sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam C. Puche is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their primary research fields include Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus within subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Sensory Systems, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The scientist's research covers various main topics, including:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Ocular Diseases and Behçet's Syndrome
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Adam C. Puche has frequently published in several venues, among which the most common are:

  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • The Journal of Supercomputing
  • Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology
  • Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open

Their recent publications illustrate a range of topics primarily concentrated on neuroscience and brain injury, as well as digital pathology and cellular mechanisms. Key recent papers include:

  • "Generative Adversarial Networks in Digital Histopathology: Current Applications, Limitations, Ethical Considerations, and Future Directions," 2023, Modern Pathology
  • "Hyperhomocysteinemia-Induced Oxidative Stress Exacerbates Cortical Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Rats," 2020, Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
  • "Short-term plasticity in glomerular inhibitory circuits shapes olfactory bulb output," 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "Hypobaria-Induced Oxidative Stress Facilitates Homocysteine Transsulfuration and Promotes Glutathione Oxidation in Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury," 2021, Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
  • "Short-Term Plasticity in Cortical GABAergic Synapses on Olfactory Bulb Granule Cells Is Modulated by Endocannabinoids," 2021, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

The scientist has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Hamid Hoorfar
  • Gary Fiskum
  • Fu-Wen Zhou
  • Chelsea Hook
  • Kristina Fuller

Best Publications

  • Ultrasensitive pheromone detection by mammalian vomeronasal neurons.

    Trese Leinders-Zufall;Andrew P. Lane;Adam C. Puche;Weidong Ma

  • Centre-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli

    J. L. Aungst;P. M. Heyward;P. M. Heyward;A. C. Puche;S. V. Karnup

  • Quantitative analysis of neuronal diversity in the mouse olfactory bulb

    S. Parrish-Aungst;M.T. Shipley;F. Erdelyi;G. Szabo

  • Blood vessels form a scaffold for neuroblast migration in the adult olfactory bulb.

    Serena Bovetti;Yi-Chun Hsieh;Patrizia Bovolin;Isabelle Perroteau

  • Molecular identity of periglomerular and short axon cells

    Emi Kiyokage;Yu Zhen Pan;Zuoyi Shao;Kazuto Kobayashi

  • Control of RSV-induced lung injury by alternatively activated macrophages is IL-4R|[alpha]|-, TLR4-, and IFN-|[beta]|-dependent

    Kari Ann Shirey;Lioubov M. Pletneva;Adam C. Puche;Achsah D. Keegan

  • Role of galectin-1 in the developing mouse olfactory system.

    A.C. Puche;F. Poirier;M. Hair;P.F. Bartlett

  • Generation of Distinct Types of Periglomerular Olfactory Bulb Interneurons during Development and in Adult Mice: Implication for Intrinsic Properties of the Subventricular Zone Progenitor Population

    Silvia De Marchis;Serena Bovetti;Barbara Carletti;Yi-Chun Hsieh

  • A divergent pattern of sensory axonal projections is rendered convergent by second-order neurons in the accessory olfactory bulb

    Karina Del Punta;Adam Puche;Niels C Adams;Ivan Rodriguez

  • Development of the olfactory bulb: evidence for glia-neuron interactions in glomerular formation.

    Mary S. Bailey;Adam C. Puche;Michael T. Shipley

  • Transcription factor KLF7 is important for neuronal morphogenesis in selected regions of the nervous system.

    Friedrich Laub;Lei Lei;Hideaki Sumiyoshi;Daisuke Kajimura

  • Binge alcohol drinking is associated with GABAA α2-regulated Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression in the central amygdala

    Juan Liu;Andrew R. S. T. Yang;Timothy Kelly;Adam Puche

  • Inhibition of Olfactory Receptor Neuron Input to Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli Mediated by Suppression of Presynaptic Calcium Influx

    Matt Wachowiak;John P. McGann;Philip M. Heyward;Zuoyi Shao

  • Toll-Like Receptor 2-Mediated Signaling Requirements for Francisella tularensis Live Vaccine Strain Infection of Murine Macrophages

    Leah E. Cole;Kari Ann Shirey;Eileen Barry;Araceli Santiago

  • The Olfactory System

    Michael T. Shipley;Matthew Ennis;Adam C. Puche

  • Olfactory Bulb Short Axon Cell Release of GABA and Dopamine Produces a Temporally Biphasic Inhibition–Excitation Response in External Tufted Cells

    Shaolin Liu;Celine Plachez;Zuoyi Shao;Adam Puche

  • Cholinergic inputs from Basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor coding in the olfactory bulb.

    Markus Rothermel;Ryan M. Carey;Adam Puche;Michael T. Shipley

  • CRF-amplified neuronal TLR4/MCP-1 signaling regulates alcohol self-administration.

    Harry L June;Juan Liu;Kaitlin T Warnock;Kimberly A Bell

  • Two GABAergic Intraglomerular Circuits Differentially Regulate Tonic and Phasic Presynaptic Inhibition of Olfactory Nerve Terminals

    Zuoyi Shao;Adam C. Puche;Emi Kiyokage;Gabor Szabo

  • Development of midline glial populations at the corticoseptal boundary.

    Tianzhi Shu;Adam C. Puche;Linda J. Richards

  • Olfactory receptor neurons express D2 dopamine receptors.

    N.L. Koster;A.B. Norman;N.M. Richtand;W.T. Nickell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael T. Shipley
Michael T. Shipley University of Maryland, Baltimore
Brian Key
Brian Key University of Queensland
Gary Fiskum
Gary Fiskum University of Maryland, Baltimore
Aldo Fasolo
Aldo Fasolo University of Turin
Matt Wachowiak
Matt Wachowiak University of Utah
Laure Aurelian
Laure Aurelian University of Maryland, Baltimore
Alan S. Cross
Alan S. Cross University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lai-Xi Wang
Lai-Xi Wang University of Maryland, College Park
Linda J. Richards
Linda J. Richards Washington University in St. Louis
Erik P. Lillehoj
Erik P. Lillehoj University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adam C. Puche

Trending Scientists