World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
16157
World Ranking
10111
National Ranking
4423

Philip J. S. Stork publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. S. Stork sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 128 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Philip J. S. Stork D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. S. Stork sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. S. Stork is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within economics, econometrics, finance, and molecular biology, with particular focus on financial markets, investment strategies, and biological aspects related to aging and mitochondrial function.

Their publication record includes contributions to several fields, such as finance, economics and econometrics, molecular biology, management science, and aging. The main fields of study for their work are categorized as Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with subfields including Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology, Management Science and Operations Research, and Aging.

Research topics frequently addressed by Philip J. S. Stork cover a broad range of areas:

  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Corporate Finance and Governance

The scientist has published papers in several notable venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Practical Applications
  • Quantitative Finance
  • Journal of Forecasting

Philip J. S. Stork has collaborated extensively with a select group of researchers. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Remco C. J. Zwinkels
  • John N. Koberstein
  • Melissa L. Stewart
  • Chadwick B. Smith
  • Richard H. Goodman

Noteworthy recent publications that demonstrate the range of their work include:

  • Monitoring glycolytic dynamics in single cells using a fluorescent biosensor for fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Carbon Beta: A Market-Based Measure of Climate Risk, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Local and dynamic regulation of neuronal glycolysis in vivo, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Implied volatility sentiment: a tale of two tails, 2020, Quantitative Finance
  • Behavioral heterogeneity in return expectations across equity style portfolios, 2020, International Review of Finance

Best Publications

  • cAMP Activates MAP Kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf- and Rap1-Dependent Pathway

    Mark R. Vossler;Hong Yao;Randall D. York;Randall D. York;Ming Gui Pan

  • Crosstalk between cAMP and MAP kinase signaling in the regulation of cell proliferation.

    Philip J.S Stork;John M Schmitt

  • Rap1 mediates sustained MAP kinase activation induced by nerve growth factor

    Randall D. York;Hong Yao;Tara Dillon;Cindy L. Ellig

  • Signaling pathways for PC12 cell differentiation: making the right connections.

    D. Vaudry;P. J. S. Stork;P. Lazarovici;L. E. Eiden

  • Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase signalling in neurons.

    Savraj S. Grewal;Randall D. York;Philip J.S. Stork

  • Regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase cascade

    Hervé Enslen;Hiroshi Tokumitsu;Philip J.S. Stork;Roger J. Davis

  • PKA Phosphorylation of Src Mediates cAMP's Inhibition of Cell Growth via Rap1

    John M Schmitt;Philip J.S Stork

  • Allosteric Activation of Functionally Asymmetric RAF Kinase Dimers

    Jiancheng Hu;Edward C. Stites;Haiyang Yu;Elizabeth A. Germino

  • A Novel Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase. STRUCTURE, EXPRESSION, AND REGULATION ∗

    Anita Misra-Press;Caroline S. Rim;Hong Yao;Mark S. Roberson

  • Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase and Endocytosis in Nerve Growth Factor-Induced Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation via Ras and Rap1

    Randall D. York;Derek C. Molliver;Savraj S. Grewal;Paula E. Stenberg

  • Does Rap1 deserve a bad Rap

    Philip J.S. Stork

  • G Protein Activation of a Hormone-Stimulated Phosphatase in Human Tumor Cells

    Ming Gui Pan;Tuillio Florio;Philip J. S. Stork

  • A colorimetric assay for measuring activation of Gs- and Gq-coupled signaling pathways.

    Wen Biao Chen;Tammy S. Shields;Philip J.S. Stork;Roger D. Cone

  • β2-Adrenergic Receptor Activates Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinases (ERKs) via the Small G Protein Rap1 and the Serine/Threonine Kinase B-Raf

    John M. Schmitt;Philip J.S. Stork

  • Rap1-Mediated Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases by Cyclic AMP Is Dependent on the Mode of Rap1 Activation

    Zhiping Wang;Tara J. Dillon;Viji Pokala;Snigdha Mishra

  • A role for mitogen-activated protein kinase in mediating activation of the glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone.

    Mark S. Roberson;Anita Misra-Press;Megan E. Laurance;Philip J.S. Stork

  • Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 1 is overexpressed in prostate cancers and is inversely related to apoptosis

    C. Magi-Galluzzi;R. Mishra;M. Fiorentino;R. Montironi

  • Expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 in the early phases of human epithelial carcinogenesis.

    Massimo Loda;Paola Capodieci;Rajesh Mishra;Hong Yao

  • Modulation of Rap Activity by Direct Interaction of Gαo with Rap1 GTPase-activating Protein

    J. Dedrick Jordan;Kendall D. Carey;Philip J.S. Stork;Ravi Iyengar

  • Cyclic AMP-mediated inhibition of cell growth requires the small G protein Rap1.

    John M. Schmitt;Philip J. S. Stork

Frequent Co-Authors

Tullio Florio
Tullio Florio University of Genoa
Massimo Loda
Massimo Loda Cornell University
Ray E. Hershberger
Ray E. Hershberger The Ohio State University
Joe W. Gray
Joe W. Gray Oregon Health & Science University
David C. Parker
David C. Parker Oregon Health & Science University
Charles T. Roberts
Charles T. Roberts Oregon National Primate Research Center
Michael Forte
Michael Forte Oregon Health & Science University
Olivier Civelli
Olivier Civelli University of California, Irvine
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
Cristina Magi-Galluzzi University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse healthcare careers accessible through online study. For those drawn to medical imaging, online sonography certificate programs provide specialized training in ultrasound technology, blending biology knowledge with hands-on clinical skills.

Similarly, radiology tech online programs offer flexible options to start a career in diagnostic imaging. These programs cater to students balancing work, family, or other commitments while pursuing credentials in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in nutrition science, the best dietetics masters programs deliver advanced studies that bridge biochemistry and patient care. Graduates can become registered dietitians, helping people improve health through evidence-based nutrition.

Entry-level roles are also available via online medical assistant programs fafsa approved, allowing candidates to gain foundational healthcare skills with financial aid options.

These degree pathways demonstrate how Biology and Biochemistry backgrounds can shape rewarding careers across medical technology, patient support, and nutrition—all made accessible through quality online education.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. S. Stork

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles