World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
43
Citations
7376
World Ranking
4843
National Ranking
2169

David C. Parker publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Parker sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 100 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

David C. Parker D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Parker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Parker is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Social Sciences, and Arts and Humanities.

The primary subfields of David C. Parker's work include Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Sociology and Political Science, and Religious studies. Their research topics cover areas such as CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Microtubule and mitosis dynamics, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Historical and Linguistic Studies, and Biblical Studies and Interpretation.

One of their recent papers, published in 2021, is titled "Fine-tuned repression of Drp1 driven mitochondrial fission primes a 'stem/progenitor-like state' to accelerate neoplastic transformation". This work appeared in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

  • Brian Spurlock
  • MK Basu
  • Anita B. Hjelmeland
  • G Sajina
  • S Liu

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • T Cell-Dependent B Cell Activation

    David C. Parker

  • Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens.

    Elizabeth E. Eynon;David C. Parker

  • Survival of mouse pancreatic islet allografts in recipients treated with allogeneic small lymphocytes and antibody to CD40 ligand

    David C. Parker;Dale L. Greiner;Nancy E. Phillips;Michael C. Appel

  • Cross-linking of B lymphocyte Fc gamma receptors and membrane immunoglobulin inhibits anti-immunoglobulin-induced blastogenesis.

    N E Phillips;D C Parker

  • Fc-dependent inhibition of mouse B cell activation by whole anti-mu antibodies.

    N E Phillips;D C Parker

  • Induction and suppression of polyclonal antibody responses by anti-Ig reagents and antigen-nonspecific helper factors: a comparison of the effects of anti-Fab, anti-IgM, and anti IgD on murine B cells.

    David C. Parker

  • Stimulation of mouse lymphocytes by insoluble anti-mouse immunoglobulin.

    David C. Parker

  • Major histocompatibility complex-restricted, polyclonal B cell responses resulting from helper T cell recognition of antiimmunoglobulin presented by small B lymphocytes.

    Hans Peter Tony;David C. Parker

  • B-cell activation by crosslinking of surface IgM or ligation of CD40 involves alternative signal pathways and results in different B-cell phenotypes.

    Henry H. Wortis;Mark Teutsch;Mindy Higer;Jenny Zheng

  • Role of membrane immunoglobulin (Ig) crosslinking in membrane Ig-mediated, major histocompatibility-restricted T cell-B cell cooperation.

    Hans Peter Tony;Nancy E. Phillips;David C. Parker

  • B Lymphocyte: Activation by Insoluble Anti-Immunoglobulin: Induction of Immunoglobulin Secretion by a T Cell-Dependent Soluble Factor

    David C. Parker;John J. Fothergill;Daniel C. Wadsworth

  • Multiple binding sites for bacterial superantigens on soluble class II MHC molecules

    Haruo Kozono;David Parker;Janice White;Janice White;Philippa Marrack

  • Peptide-Specific Intercellular Transfer of MHC Class II to CD4+ T Cells Directly from the Immunological Synapse upon Cellular Dissociation

    Scott A. Wetzel;Timothy W. McKeithan;David C. Parker

  • A Signal through OX40 (CD134) Allows Anergic, Autoreactive T Cells to Acquire Effector Cell Functions

    Stephanie K. Lathrop;Cortny A. Huddleston;Per A. Dullforce;Megan J. Montfort

  • Separable helper factors support B cell proliferation and maturation to Ig secretion.

    D C Parker

  • T cell-dependent induction of NF-kappa B in B cells.

    Anne Christine Lalmanach-Girard;Thomas C. Chiles;David C. Parker;Thomas L. Rothstein

  • Resting B Lymphocytes as APC for Naive T Lymphocytes: Dependence on CD40 Ligand/CD40

    Dean E. Evans;Michael W. Munks;Jeffrey M. Purkerson;David C. Parker

  • Live-Cell Dynamics and the Role of Costimulation in Immunological Synapse Formation

    Scott A. Wetzel;Timothy W. McKeithan;David C. Parker

  • Preformed CD40 ligand exists in secretory lysosomes in effector and memory CD4+ T cells and is quickly expressed on the cell surface in an antigen-specific manner.

    Yoshinobu Koguchi;Timothy J. Thauland;Mark K. Slifka;David C. Parker

  • Nonspecific and specific immuno-suppression in tumour-bearing mice by soluble immune complexes

    R. M. Gorczynski;D. G. Kilburn;R. A. Knight;C. Norbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark K. Slifka
Mark K. Slifka Oregon National Primate Research Center
Philippa Marrack
Philippa Marrack National Jewish Health
John W. Kappler
John W. Kappler National Jewish Health
Andrew D. Weinberg
Andrew D. Weinberg Providence Portland Medical Center
James T. Rosenbaum
James T. Rosenbaum Oregon Health & Science University
Stephen R. Planck
Stephen R. Planck Oregon Health & Science University
Philip J. S. Stork
Philip J. S. Stork Oregon Health & Science University
Michael L. Dustin
Michael L. Dustin University of Oxford
Fred Heffron
Fred Heffron Oregon Health & Science University
Janice White
Janice White Howard Hughes Medical Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Immunology can open doors to a variety of healthcare and research careers. For those interested in clinical practice alongside immunology knowledge, transitioning into nurse practitioner roles is a common pathway. Programs designed for professionals looking to advance, such as fnp to acute care np, provide specialized training to work with acute patient needs.

Online education offers flexible options for those starting or advancing their nursing careers. Popular choices include accelerated nurse practitioner programs that reduce time to degree completion while focusing on essential clinical skills. For individuals without a nursing background, there are options like 12-month accelerated nursing programs online for non nurses, enabling a swift entry into healthcare fields.

Additionally, those seeking more accessible entry points may find value in exploring accelerated nursing programs near me, which focus on quicker admissions with comprehensive clinical preparation. These options complement immunology studies by fostering diverse skill sets in patient care, research, and healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles