World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7509 6924 573 528 92 13454

Stuart Clare publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stuart Clare between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stuart Clare published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 6 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 20 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1997 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stuart Clare: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 6
1998 2
1999 9
2000 1
2001 8
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 7
2006 5
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 4
2015 8
2016 6
2017 5
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 3
2022 1
2023 20
2024 3
2025 3
Total 117
Download as CSV

Stuart Clare publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Clare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 92
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Stuart Clare D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Clare sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stuart Clare is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with particular focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and neurology. Their research spans a diverse set of subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, infectious diseases, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's recent scholarly work features several publications across notable journals and platforms. Key papers include:

  • Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: Results from the UK7T study (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7 T in COVID-19: brainstem effects and outcome associations (2024, Brain)
  • Subthalamic nucleus shows opposite functional connectivity pattern in Huntington's and Parkinson's disease (2023, Brain Communications)
  • Factors predicting the transition from acute to persistent pain in people with 'sciatica': the FORECAST longitudinal prognostic factor cohort study protocol (2023, BMJ Open)
  • Multi-centre, multi-vendor 7 Tesla fMRI reproducibility of hand digit representation in the human somatosensory cortex (2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Brain, Brain Communications, and proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. These reflect a consistent engagement with advanced imaging techniques and neuroscience topics.

Main research topics covered by Stuart Clare encompass:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Frequent collaborators include Catarina Rua, William T. Clarke, Christopher T. Rodgers, James B. Rowe, and Guy Williams, indicating a network of coauthors actively engaged in neuroimaging and related clinical research.

Best Publications

  • Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

    Timothy E.J. Behrens;M. W. Woolrich;Mi Jenkinson;H. Johansen-Berg

  • Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain.

    A Ploghaus;I Tracey;J S Gati;S Clare

  • Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI.

    Susanna J. Bantick;Richard G. Wise;Alexander Ploghaus;Stuart Clare

  • Exacerbation of Pain by Anxiety Is Associated with Activity in a Hippocampal Network

    A Ploghaus;C Narain;C F Beckmann;S Clare

  • Imaging Attentional Modulation of Pain in the Periaqueductal Gray in Humans

    Irene Tracey;Alexander Ploghaus;Joseph S. Gati;Stuart Clare

  • The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas.

    S Francis;E T Rolls;R Bowtell;F McGlone

  • Sources of distortion in functional MRI data.

    Peter Jezzard;Stuart Clare

  • Learning about pain: The neural substrate of the prediction error for aversive events

    A. Ploghaus;I. Tracey;S. Clare;J. S. Gati

  • fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain

    Sezgi Goksan;Caroline Hartley;Faith Emery;Naomi Cockrill

  • CSF1R inhibitor JNJ-40346527 attenuates microglial proliferation and neurodegeneration in P301S mice

    Renzo Mancuso;Gemma Fryatt;Madeleine Cleal;Juliane Obst

  • Inflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease plasma

    Angharad R Morgan;Samuel Touchard;Claire Leckey;Caroline O'Hagan

  • Independent anatomical and functional measures of the V1/V2 boundary in human visual cortex.

    H Bridge;S Clare;M Jenkinson;P Jezzard

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area

    Miles Humberstone;Guy V. Sawle;Stuart Clare;Jonathan Hykin

  • Automatic compensation of motion artifacts in MRI.

    David Atkinson;Derek L.G. Hill;Peter N.R. Stoyle;Paul E. Summers

  • Rapid T(1) mapping using multislice echo planar imaging.

    Stuart Clare;Peter Jezzard

  • Unmasking Latent Inhibitory Connections in Human Cortex to Reveal Dormant Cortical Memories

    H. C. Barron;H. C. Barron;T. P. Vogels;U. E. Emir;T. R. Makin

  • Noninvasive Quantification of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Human Gliomas with IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations

    U E Emir;S J Larkin;N de Pennington;N Voets

  • White matter and lesion T1 relaxation times increase in parallel and correlate with disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A Parry;S Clare;M Jenkinson;S Smith

  • Fetal brain activity demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging

    J Hykin;R Moore;K Duncan;S Clare

  • Investigating the Stability of Fine-Grain Digit Somatotopy in Individual Human Participants.

    James Kolasinski;Tamar R. Makin;Saad Jbabdi;Stuart Clare

  • Author response: fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain

    Sezgi Goksan;Caroline Hartley;Faith Emery;Naomi Cockrill

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Jezzard
Peter Jezzard University of Oxford
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Mark Jenkinson
Mark Jenkinson University of Oxford
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham
Holly Bridge
Holly Bridge University of Oxford
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford
Karla L. Miller
Karla L. Miller University of Oxford
Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith University of Oxford
Charlotte J. Stagg
Charlotte J. Stagg University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring Neuroscience, you might also consider related online degrees that open diverse career pathways in mental health, social services, and behavior analysis. Online learning options make it possible to balance studies with work or other commitments, offering flexibility and accessibility.

Social work is a common field for those interested in helping others, and finding the most affordable online msw programs can be a crucial factor for students managing tuition costs. For those seeking a faster route to this professional credential, there are also accelerated social work degree options available online.

Students interested in behavior analysis—a key area often applied in educational or clinical settings—can benefit from approved bcba coursework online. If your interests align more closely with understanding behavior and mental processes, earning a psychology degree online can further expand your professional and academic opportunities.

These alternative and complementary online programs can help you tailor your education to meet specific career goals, making the neuroscience pathway even more versatile.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Clare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles