World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
13454
World Ranking
7509
National Ranking
573

Stuart Clare publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Clare sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stuart Clare D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Clare sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart Clare is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with particular focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and neurology. Their research spans a diverse set of subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, infectious diseases, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's recent scholarly work features several publications across notable journals and platforms. Key papers include:

  • Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: Results from the UK7T study (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7 T in COVID-19: brainstem effects and outcome associations (2024, Brain)
  • Subthalamic nucleus shows opposite functional connectivity pattern in Huntington's and Parkinson's disease (2023, Brain Communications)
  • Factors predicting the transition from acute to persistent pain in people with 'sciatica': the FORECAST longitudinal prognostic factor cohort study protocol (2023, BMJ Open)
  • Multi-centre, multi-vendor 7 Tesla fMRI reproducibility of hand digit representation in the human somatosensory cortex (2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Brain, Brain Communications, and proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. These reflect a consistent engagement with advanced imaging techniques and neuroscience topics.

Main research topics covered by Stuart Clare encompass:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Frequent collaborators include Catarina Rua, William T. Clarke, Christopher T. Rodgers, James B. Rowe, and Guy Williams, indicating a network of coauthors actively engaged in neuroimaging and related clinical research.

Best Publications

  • Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

    Timothy E.J. Behrens;M. W. Woolrich;Mi Jenkinson;H. Johansen-Berg

  • Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain.

    A Ploghaus;I Tracey;J S Gati;S Clare

  • Imaging how attention modulates pain in humans using functional MRI.

    Susanna J. Bantick;Richard G. Wise;Alexander Ploghaus;Stuart Clare

  • Exacerbation of Pain by Anxiety Is Associated with Activity in a Hippocampal Network

    A Ploghaus;C Narain;C F Beckmann;S Clare

  • Imaging Attentional Modulation of Pain in the Periaqueductal Gray in Humans

    Irene Tracey;Alexander Ploghaus;Joseph S. Gati;Stuart Clare

  • The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas.

    S Francis;E T Rolls;R Bowtell;F McGlone

  • Sources of distortion in functional MRI data.

    Peter Jezzard;Stuart Clare

  • Learning about pain: The neural substrate of the prediction error for aversive events

    A. Ploghaus;I. Tracey;S. Clare;J. S. Gati

  • fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain

    Sezgi Goksan;Caroline Hartley;Faith Emery;Naomi Cockrill

  • CSF1R inhibitor JNJ-40346527 attenuates microglial proliferation and neurodegeneration in P301S mice

    Renzo Mancuso;Gemma Fryatt;Madeleine Cleal;Juliane Obst

  • Inflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease plasma

    Angharad R Morgan;Samuel Touchard;Claire Leckey;Caroline O'Hagan

  • Independent anatomical and functional measures of the V1/V2 boundary in human visual cortex.

    H Bridge;S Clare;M Jenkinson;P Jezzard

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area

    Miles Humberstone;Guy V. Sawle;Stuart Clare;Jonathan Hykin

  • Automatic compensation of motion artifacts in MRI.

    David Atkinson;Derek L.G. Hill;Peter N.R. Stoyle;Paul E. Summers

  • Rapid T(1) mapping using multislice echo planar imaging.

    Stuart Clare;Peter Jezzard

  • Unmasking Latent Inhibitory Connections in Human Cortex to Reveal Dormant Cortical Memories

    H. C. Barron;H. C. Barron;T. P. Vogels;U. E. Emir;T. R. Makin

  • Noninvasive Quantification of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Human Gliomas with IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations

    U E Emir;S J Larkin;N de Pennington;N Voets

  • White matter and lesion T1 relaxation times increase in parallel and correlate with disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A Parry;S Clare;M Jenkinson;S Smith

  • Fetal brain activity demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging

    J Hykin;R Moore;K Duncan;S Clare

  • Investigating the Stability of Fine-Grain Digit Somatotopy in Individual Human Participants.

    James Kolasinski;Tamar R. Makin;Saad Jbabdi;Stuart Clare

  • Author response: fMRI reveals neural activity overlap between adult and infant pain

    Sezgi Goksan;Caroline Hartley;Faith Emery;Naomi Cockrill

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Jezzard
Peter Jezzard University of Oxford
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Mark Jenkinson
Mark Jenkinson University of Oxford
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham
Holly Bridge
Holly Bridge University of Oxford
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford
Karla L. Miller
Karla L. Miller University of Oxford
Stephen M. Smith
Stephen M. Smith University of Oxford
Charlotte J. Stagg
Charlotte J. Stagg University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring Neuroscience, you might also consider related online degrees that open diverse career pathways in mental health, social services, and behavior analysis. Online learning options make it possible to balance studies with work or other commitments, offering flexibility and accessibility.

Social work is a common field for those interested in helping others, and finding the most affordable online msw programs can be a crucial factor for students managing tuition costs. For those seeking a faster route to this professional credential, there are also accelerated social work degree options available online.

Students interested in behavior analysis—a key area often applied in educational or clinical settings—can benefit from approved bcba coursework online. If your interests align more closely with understanding behavior and mental processes, earning a psychology degree online can further expand your professional and academic opportunities.

These alternative and complementary online programs can help you tailor your education to meet specific career goals, making the neuroscience pathway even more versatile.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Clare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles