World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
17822
World Ranking
4102
National Ranking
359

Charlotte J. Stagg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte J. Stagg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 198 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Charlotte J. Stagg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte J. Stagg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charlotte J. Stagg is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with extensive contributions to subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics within neuroscience, notably focusing on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications.

Stagg has contributed to various frequent publication venues, demonstrating a consistent presence in the academic community. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain stimulation
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • The Journal of Physiology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Their recent papers reflect a focus on neurostimulation techniques and methodological standards:

  • Transcranial focused ultrasound-mediated neurochemical and functional connectivity changes in deep cortical regions in humans, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Brain stimulation
  • FSL-MRS: An end-to-end spectroscopy analysis package, 2020, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement, 2022, Nature Protocols
  • A range of pulses commonly used for human transcranial ultrasound stimulation are clearly audible, 2021, Brain stimulation

Stagg frequently collaborates with various researchers, including:

  • Ioana Grigoras
  • Catharina Zich
  • Tulika Nandi
  • William T. Clarke
  • Lennart Verhagen

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Nathalie André-Obadia;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache

  • Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Charlotte J. Stagg;Michael A. Nitsche

  • A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools

    A.J. Woods;A. Antal;M. Bikson;P.S. Boggio

  • Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

    C J Stagg;J G Best;M C Stephenson;J O'Shea

  • The Role of GABA in Human Motor Learning

    Charlotte J. Stagg;Velicia Bachtiar;Heidi Johansen-Berg

  • Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

    C J Stagg;G Jayaram;D Pastor;Z T Kincses

  • Faciobrachial dystonic seizures: the influence of immunotherapy on seizure control and prevention of cognitive impairment in a broadening phenotype

    Sarosh R. Irani;Charlotte J. Stagg;Jonathan M. Schott;Clive R. Rosenthal

  • Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Charlotte J Stagg;Andrea Antal;Michael A Nitsche

  • Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex

    C J Stagg;S Bestmann;A O Constantinescu;A O Constantinescu;L Moreno Moreno

  • Neurochemical Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

    C J Stagg;M Wylezinska;P M Matthews;H Johansen-Berg

  • Diffusion imaging of whole, post-mortem human brains on a clinical MRI scanner.

    Karla L. Miller;Charlotte J. Stagg;Gwenaëlle Douaud;Saâd Jbabdi

  • Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Charlotte J. Stagg;Richard L. Lin;Richard L. Lin;Melvin Mezue;Melvin Mezue;Andrew Segerdahl;Andrew Segerdahl

  • Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Velicia Bachtiar;Jamie Near;Heidi Johansen-Berg;Charlotte J Stagg

  • Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke

    Claire Allman;Ugwechi Amadi;Anderson M. Winkler;Leigh Wilkins

  • Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke.

    Charlotte Jane Stagg;Velicia Bachtiar;Jacinta O'Shea;Claire Allman

  • Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women

    Katy Vincent;Catherine Warnaby;Charlotte J. Stagg;Jane Moore

  • Local GABA concentration is related to network-level resting functional connectivity

    Charlotte J Stagg;Velicia Bachtiar;Ugwechi Amadi;Christel A Gudberg

  • The dynamics of cortical GABA in human motor learning.

    James Kolasinski;James Kolasinski;Emily L. Hinson;Amir P. Divanbeighi Zand;Assen Rizov

  • Modulation of movement-associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation

    C J Stagg;J O'Shea;Z T Kincses;M Woolrich

  • Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke

    Jacinta O'Shea;Marie Hélène Boudrias;Charlotte Jane Stagg;Velicia Bachtiar

  • Report The Role of GABA in Human Motor Learning

    Charlotte J. Stagg;Velicia Bachtiar;Heidi Johansen-Berg

Frequent Co-Authors

Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford
Jamie Near
Jamie Near Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Mark W. Woolrich
Mark W. Woolrich University of Oxford
Nicola Filippini
Nicola Filippini University of Oxford
Sven Bestmann
Sven Bestmann University College London
Stuart Clare
Stuart Clare University of Oxford
Peter Jezzard
Peter Jezzard University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte J. Stagg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles