World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 83 1442 1310 124 119 389 25971

Agnes Flöel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Agnes Flöel between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Agnes Flöel published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 53 of the 464 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 29 publications
2000 2025

464 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Agnes Flöel: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 7
2001 4
2002 5
2003 5
2004 8
2005 14
2006 6
2007 4
2008 19
2009 18
2010 9
2011 18
2012 13
2013 19
2014 25
2015 17
2016 25
2017 22
2018 31
2019 20
2020 30
2021 32
2022 32
2023 28
2024 24
2025 29
Total 464
Download as CSV

Agnes Flöel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes Flöel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 388–397 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 389 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54 389
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Agnes Flöel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes Flöel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126 83
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Agnes Flöel is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus also on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Rehabilitation.

The main research topics of Agnes Flöel include studies on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Functional Brain Connectivity, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Neural and Behavioral Psychology, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Prominent recent publications by Agnes Flöel include the following:

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • Anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Alzheimer's disease, 2023, Brain
  • Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • SARS-CoV-2 and Guillain-Barré syndrome: molecular mimicry with human heat shock proteins as potential pathogenic mechanism, 2020, Cell Stress and Chaperones
  • Anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies causing VITT do not cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, 2021, Blood

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Agnes Flöel include:

  • Daria Antonenko
  • Ulrike Grittner
  • Marcus Meinzer
  • Laura Göschel
  • Friederike Thams

The researcher has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain stimulation
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology

Best Publications

  • Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans.

    Stefan Knecht;B. Dräger;M. Deppe;L. Bobe

  • Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke

    Friedhelm Hummel;Pablo Celnik;Pascal Giraux;Agnes Floel

  • Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines

    A. Antal;Ivan Alekseichuk;M. Bikson;J. Brockmöller

  • High impact running improves learning

    Bernward Winter;Caterina Breitenstein;Frank C. Mooren;Klaus Voelker

  • Caloric restriction improves memory in elderly humans

    A. V. Witte;M. Fobker;R. Gellner;S. Knecht

  • Physical activity and memory functions: an interventional study

    R. Ruscheweyh;C. Willemer;K. Krüger;T. Duning

  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning

    Agnes Flöel;Nina Rösser;Olesya Michka;Stefan Knecht

  • Effects of Resveratrol on Memory Performance, Hippocampal Functional Connectivity, and Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Older Adults

    A. Veronica Witte;A. Veronica Witte;Lucia Kerti;Daniel S. Margulies;Agnes Flöel

  • tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases.

    Agnes Flöel

  • Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acids Improve Brain Function and Structure in Older Adults

    A. Veronica Witte;A. Veronica Witte;Lucia Kerti;Henrike M. Hermannstädter;Jochen B. Fiebach

  • Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting

    Caterina Breitenstein;Tanja Grewe;Agnes Flöel;Wolfram Ziegler

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects

    Amir Amedi;Agnes Floel;Agnes Floel;Stefan Knecht;Ehud Zohary

  • Physical activity and memory functions: are neurotrophins and cerebral gray matter volume the missing link?

    Agnes Flöel;Ruth Ruscheweyh;Karsten Krüger;C. Willemer

  • Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Cognitive Performance by Modulating Functional Connectivity and Task-Specific Activation

    Marcus Meinzer;Daria Antonenko;Robert Lindenberg;Stefan Hetzer

  • Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabilitation.

    Carlo Miniussi;Stefano F. Cappa;Leonardo G. Cohen;Agnes Floel

  • Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Temporarily Reverses Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Functional Brain Activity Changes

    Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Robert Lindenberg;Daria Antonenko;Tobias Flaisch

  • Levodopa: faster and better word learning in normal humans.

    Stefan Knecht;Caterina Breitenstein;Stefan Bushuven;Stefanie Wailke

  • Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke

    Friedhelm C Hummel;Friedhelm C Hummel;Bernhard Voller;Pablo Celnik;Agnes Floel

  • Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions

    S. Knecht;A. Flöel;B. Dräger;C. Breitenstein

  • Higher glucose levels associated with lower memory and reduced hippocampal microstructure

    Lucia Kerti;A. Veronica Witte;Angela Winkler;Ulrike Grittner

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Knecht
Stefan Knecht Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Caterina Breitenstein
Caterina Breitenstein University of Münster
Marcus Meinzer
Marcus Meinzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
A. Veronica Witte
A. Veronica Witte Max Planck Society
Ulrike Grittner
Ulrike Grittner Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Leonardo G. Cohen
Leonardo G. Cohen National Institutes of Health
Hubertus Lohmann
Hubertus Lohmann University of Münster
Michael Deppe
Michael Deppe University of Münster
Johannes Pantel
Johannes Pantel Goethe University Frankfurt
Jens Sommer
Jens Sommer Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to many related online degrees and flexible career pathways. Many students complement their neuroscience studies with psychology or social work credentials, each bringing distinct perspectives to the understanding of the brain, behavior, and mental health.

Affordability is a common priority. For those starting out or adding to their expertise, consider the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology for a cost-effective introduction to behavioral sciences. If your goal is to work with communities or in clinical settings, an accessible program like the easiest online msw program can be a practical next step.

For advanced clinical roles, students may pursue doctoral-level options such as online psyd clinical psychology programs. Alternatively, those interested in therapy and relationship counseling can explore specialized training through online mft programs.

Each pathway offers unique benefits, flexibility, and career prospects—allowing neuroscience students to broaden their skills and impact in the health and social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Agnes Flöel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles