World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5197 5054 2386 2305 103 26127

Manuel Blum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manuel Blum between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manuel Blum published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1995. 2 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1995. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 3 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 4 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1964 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manuel Blum: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 1
1966 0
1967 3
1968 1
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 1
1973 4
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 4
1984 3
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 3
1989 4
1990 3
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 3
1995 5
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 0
2013 3
2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 3
2018 0
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 109
Download as CSV

Manuel Blum publications per year - data summary

  • Manuel Blum, a Computer Science scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, has 109 publications recorded across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 1995, with 5 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1964, 1965, 1968, 1969 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 8 of the 62 years in the span carry no publications at all (1966, 1970, 1976, 1979 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 1.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.0 per year counting only the 54 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 9 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1984: 28 publications (1.3 per year); 1985-2005: 46 publications (2.2 per year); 2006-2025: 35 publications (1.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Manuel Blum publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Blum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 103 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 103
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Manuel Blum publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Manuel Blum, a Computer Science scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, records 103 publications - the 9th percentile of the discipline.
  • 9% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Manuel Blum, and about 91% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Manuel Blum ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Manuel Blum D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manuel Blum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Manuel Blum D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Manuel Blum, a Computer Science scholar from Carnegie Mellon University, records 51 D-Index - the 63rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 63% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Manuel Blum, and about 37% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Manuel Blum ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the foundations of computational complexity theory and its application to cryptography and program checking
  • 2006 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to abstract complexity theory, inductive inference, cryptographic protocols, and the theory and applications of program checkers.
  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1995 - A. M. Turing Award In recognition of his contributions to the foundations of computational complexity theory and its application to cryptography and program checking.
  • 1991 - Monie A. Ferst Award, Sigma Xi
  • 1982 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1971 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Manuel Blum is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. The research focus centers predominantly on computer science, with substantial contributions in computational theory and mathematics, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. Their work also touches on general health professions and information systems to a lesser extent.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Cognitive Computing and Networks
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Biometric Identification and Security

Recent publications authored by Manuel Blum demonstrate a focus on theoretical computer science perspectives applied to consciousness and artificial intelligence, as well as human computation models. Notable papers include:

  • "The complexity of human computation via a concrete model with an application to passwords," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A Theoretical Computer Science Perspective on Consciousness," 2021, Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness

Frequent co-authors in Manuel Blum's research include:

  • Lenore Blum
  • Santosh Vempala
  • Zsofia Rozsnai
  • Béatrice Diallo
  • Carmen Florian

The scientist has published frequently in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
  • Primary and Hospital Care Allgemeine Innere Medizin

Manuel Blum has been recognized with multiple awards and honors over their career. These include:

  • ACM Fellow (2020) for contributions to foundations of computational complexity theory and its applications
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2006) for work in abstract complexity theory, cryptographic protocols, and program checkers
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2002)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1995)
  • A. M. Turing Award (1995) for contributions to computational complexity theory and cryptography
  • Monie A. Ferst Award, Sigma Xi (1991)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1982)
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1971)

Best Publications

  • How to generate cryptographically strong sequences of pseudo-random bits

    Manuel Blum;Silvio Micali

  • CAPTCHA: using hard AI problems for security

    Luis Von Ahn;Manuel Blum;Nicholas J. Hopper;John Langford

  • Time bounds for selection

    Manuel Blum;Robert W. Floyd;Vaughan Pratt;Ronald L. Rivest

  • reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures

    Luis von Ahn;Benjamin Maurer;Colin McMillen;David Abraham

  • A simple unpredictable pseudo random number generator

    L Blum;M Blum;M Shub

  • Telling humans and computers apart automatically

    Luis von Ahn;Manuel Blum;John Langford

  • Non-interactive zero-knowledge and its applications

    Manuel Blum;Paul Feldman;Silvio Micali

  • A Machine-Independent Theory of the Complexity of Recursive Functions

    Manuel Blum

  • Designing programs that check their work

    Manuel Blum;Sampath Kannan

  • Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference

    Lenore Blum;Lenore Blum;Manuel Blum

  • Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images

    Luis von Ahn;Ruoran Liu;Manuel Blum

  • Secure Human Identification Protocols

    Nicholas J. Hopper;Manuel Blum

  • Coin flipping by telephone a protocol for solving impossible problems

    Manuel Blum

  • Noninteractive zero-knowledge

    Manuel Blum;Alfredo De Santis;Silvio Micali;Giuseppe Persiano

  • Checking the correctness of memories

    M. Blum;W. Evans;P. Gemmell;S. Kannan

  • Verbosity: a game for collecting common-sense facts

    Luis von Ahn;Mihir Kedia;Manuel Blum

  • Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems

    M. Blum;M. Luby;R. Rubinfeld

  • Checking the correctness of memories

    M. Blum;W. Evans;P. Gemmell;S. Kannan

  • Designing programs that check their work

    M. Blum;S. Kanna

  • Coin Flipping by Telephone.

    Manuel Blum

  • Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge and Its Applications (Extended Abstract)

    Manuel Blum;Paul Feldman;Silvio Micali

  • Telling Humans and Computers Apart Automatically or How Lazy Cryptographers do AI

    Louis von Ahn;Manuel Blum;John Langford

Frequent Co-Authors

Anupam Datta
Anupam Datta Carnegie Mellon University
John Langford
John Langford Microsoft (United States)
Nicholas Hopper
Nicholas Hopper University of Minnesota
Santosh Vempala
Santosh Vempala Georgia Institute of Technology
Sampath Kannan
Sampath Kannan University of Pennsylvania
Moni Naor
Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science
Manuela Veloso
Manuela Veloso Carnegie Mellon University
Robert E. Tarjan
Robert E. Tarjan Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and certifications can be a smart strategy for those interested in Computer Science careers. If you’re seeking cost-effective options, understanding what is the cheapest data science course in the US? can help you compare programs that fit your budget.

For those ready to specialize further, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree offers flexibility alongside in-demand technical training—opening doors to advanced roles in tech and engineering.

Not everyone has the time or resources to pursue a full-length degree. Fortunately, there are easy certifications to get online that can boost your resume and earning potential in less time.

Likewise, if you’re looking to advance quickly, it’s worth considering the shortest masters degree programs available online. These accelerated paths let you upskill and enter the job market faster.

Consider all these options to find the right learning path—whether your goal is affordability, speed, specialization, or quick certification.

Best Scientists Citing Manuel Blum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles