World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
23970
World Ranking
4279
National Ranking
321

T. Martin Embley publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Martin Embley sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 159 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

T. Martin Embley D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Martin Embley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

T. Martin Embley is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable contributions across several subfields including molecular biology, genetics, paleontology, parasitology, and molecular medicine.

The scientist's work covers a broad range of topics, with a strong emphasis on genomics and phylogenetic studies, as well as genetic diversity and population structure. Other areas of research include evolution and paleontology studies, protist diversity and phylogeny, parasitic infections and diagnostics, research on Toxoplasma gondii, and antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Recent publications reflect a focus on molecular and evolutionary biology. Key papers include:

  • Inferring the Deep Past from Molecular Data, 2021, published in Genome Biology and Evolution
  • Recoding Amino Acids to a Reduced Alphabet may Increase or Decrease Phylogenetic Accuracy, 2022, published in Systematic Biology
  • Author Correction: Phylogenomics provides robust support for a two-domains tree of life, 2020, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Biogenesis, inheritance, and 3D ultrastructure of the microsporidian mitosome, 2023, published in Life Science Alliance
  • Inhibition of mitosomal alternative oxidase causes lifecycle arrest of early-stage Trachipleistophora hominis meronts during intracellular infection of mammalian cells, 2022, published in PLoS Pathogens

Frequent coauthors in their work have included Tom A. Williams, Gergely J. Szöllősi, Cymon J. Cox, Peter G. Foster, and Sarah E. Heaps, indicating collaborative research within the molecular and evolutionary biology fields.

Publication venues where T. Martin Embley has contributed multiple times include Genome Biology and Evolution, Systematic Biology, Nature Ecology & Evolution, Life Science Alliance, and PLoS Pathogens.

The scientist has been recognized as a Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), reflecting involvement within the broader molecular biology research community.

Best Publications

  • The Genome of the African Trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei

    Matthew Berriman;Elodie Ghedin;Elodie Ghedin;Christiane Hertz-Fowler;Gaelle Blandin

  • Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges

    T. Martin Embley;William Martin

  • Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis

    Jane M. Carlton;Robert . Hirt;Joana C. Silva;Arthur L. Delcher

  • Comparative genomics of trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa.

    Najib M. El-Sayed;Peter J. Myler;Peter J. Myler;Gaëlle Blandin;Matthew Berriman

  • The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica

    Brendan Loftus;Iain Anderson;Rob Davies;U. Cecilia M. Alsmark

  • An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life

    Tom A. Williams;Peter G. Foster;Cymon J. Cox;T. Martin Embley

  • A mitochondrial remnant in the microsporidian Trachipleistophora hominis

    Bryony A. P. Williams;Robert P. Hirt;John M. Lucocq;T. Martin Embley

  • Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens

    Bland J. Finlay;Genoveva Esteban;Ken J. Clarke;Alan G. Williams

  • The archaebacterial origin of eukaryotes

    Cymon J. Cox;Peter G. Foster;Robert P. Hirt;Simon R. Harris

  • EARLY BRANCHING EUKARYOTES

    T Martin Embley;Robert P Hirt

  • Trichomonas hydrogenosomes contain the NADH dehydrogenase module of mitochondrial complex I

    Ivan Hrdy;Robert P. Hirt;Pavel Dolezal;Lucie Bardonová

  • Analysis of β-subgroup proteobacterial ammonia oxidizer populations in soil by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis and hierarchical phylogenetic probing

    John R. Stephen;John R. Stephen;George A. Kowalchuk;Mary Ann V. Bruns;Mary Ann V. Bruns;Allison E. McCaig

  • A novel route for ATP acquisition by the remnant mitochondria of Encephalitozoon cuniculi

    Anastasios D. Tsaousis;Edmund R. S. Kunji;Alina V. Goldberg;John M. Lucocq

  • Localization and functionality of microsporidian iron–sulphur cluster assembly proteins

    Alina V. Goldberg;Sabine Molik;Anastasios D. Tsaousis;Karina Neumann

  • Grassland Management Regimens Reduce Small-Scale Heterogeneity and Species Diversity of β-Proteobacterial Ammonia Oxidizer Populations

    Gordon Webster;T. Martin Embley;James I. Prosser

  • A mitochondrial Hsp70 orthologue in Vairimorpha necatrix : molecular evidence that microsporidia once contained mitochondria

    Robert P. Hirt;Bryan Healy;Charles R. Vossbrinck;Elizabeth U. Canning

  • Phylogenetic analyses of diplomonad genes reveal frequent lateral gene transfers affecting eukaryotes.

    Jan O. Andersson;Åsa M. Sjögren;Lesley A.M. Davis;T.Martin Embley

  • The use of 16S ribosomal RNA analyses to investigate the phylogeny of the family Legionellaceae.

    N K Fry;S Warwick;N A Saunders;T M Embley

  • The use of rRNA sequences and fluorescent probes to investigate the phylogenetic positions of the anaerobic ciliate Metopus palaeformis and its archaeobacterial endosymbiont.

    Embley Tm;Finlay Bj;Thomas Rh;Dyal Pl

  • Rapid Extraction of DNA and rRNA from Sediments by a Novel Hydroxyapatite Spin-Column Method.

    K J Purdy;T M Embley;S Takii;D B Nedwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Hirt
Robert P. Hirt Newcastle University
Peter G. Foster
Peter G. Foster Natural History Museum
David S. Horner
David S. Horner University of Milan
Cymon J. Cox
Cymon J. Cox University of Algarve
James I. Prosser
James I. Prosser University of Aberdeen
Neil Hall
Neil Hall Norwich Research Park
John M. Lucocq
John M. Lucocq University of St Andrews
Joel B. Dacks
Joel B. Dacks University of Alberta
Simon R. Harris
Simon R. Harris Wellcome Sanger Institute
William Martin
William Martin Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA, it’s important to know there are multiple online degrees and career pathways that can help you get started or advance in the field. Many students choose to launch their healthcare careers by enrolling in online medical assistant programs fafsa approved. These programs often offer financial aid options and build core skills relevant to laboratory and clinical work.

If you’re already a Medical Assistant, bridging into new roles is possible with an ma to lpn bridge program. This pathway can open doors to more advanced responsibilities in nursing and patient care.

Those interested in deepening their scientific knowledge might consider an online bachelor's degree in biology. Accelerated formats let learners complete degrees quickly, often while balancing work or family commitments.

For a focus on nursing or direct patient service, an online asn program is another popular choice. No matter your long-term goals, these flexible online programs can help you begin a rewarding career in health sciences and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing T. Martin Embley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles