World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Czechia
2026
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Czechia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 82 1466 1390 2 2 362 26332
Molecular Biology 82 934 828 2 2 362 26332

Julius Lukeš publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julius Lukeš between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julius Lukeš published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2015. 28 of the 512 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2015. 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

512 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julius Lukeš: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 4
1995 3
1996 1
1997 3
1998 5
1999 2
2000 7
2001 11
2002 12
2003 5
2004 7
2005 9
2006 16
2007 10
2008 9
2009 10
2010 17
2011 14
2012 22
2013 22
2014 19
2015 41
2016 24
2017 16
2018 28
2019 22
2020 31
2021 26
2022 19
2023 34
2024 24
2025 27
2026 1
Total 512
Download as CSV

Julius Lukeš publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Lukeš sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 357–366 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 362 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29 362
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Julius Lukeš D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Lukeš sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60 82
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Julius Lukeš is affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic. Their research spans multiple fields within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong emphasis on molecular biology and its applications to epidemiology, ecology, insect science, and public health.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Genomics and phylogenetic studies
  • Research on Leishmaniasis studies
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Microbial community ecology and physiology
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Julius Lukeš maintains collaborations with several frequent co-authors, which include:

  • Vyacheslav Yurchenko
  • Anzhelika Butenko
  • Kristína Záhonová
  • Jan Votýpka
  • Drahomíra Faktorová

Their research outputs have been published in journals such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • Trends in Parasitology
  • BMC Biology
  • mBio

Among the recent papers involving Julius Lukeš as co-author or contributor are:

  • "Euglenozoa: taxonomy, diversity and ecology, symbioses and viruses," 2021, Open Biology
  • "Bacterial and archaeal symbioses with protists," 2021, Current Biology
  • "Lexis and Grammar of Mitochondrial RNA Processing in Trypanosomes," 2020, Trends in Parasitology
  • "Returning to the Fold for Lessons in Mitochondrial Crista Diversity and Evolution," 2020, Current Biology
  • "Evolution of metabolic capabilities and molecular features of diplonemids, kinetoplastids, and euglenids," 2020, BMC Biology

The scientist's body of work integrates molecular biology approaches to study parasitic protozoa, specifically targeting trypanosome species and their RNA processing mechanisms, as well as ecological and evolutionary aspects of protists.

Julius Lukeš has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2018.

Best Publications

  • Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean

    Colomban de Vargas;Colomban de Vargas;Stéphane Audic;Stéphane Audic;Nicolas Henry;Nicolas Henry;Johan Decelle;Johan Decelle

  • The revised classification of eukaryotes

    Sina M. Adl;Sina M. Adl;Alastair G. B. Simpson;Christopher E. Lane;Julius Lukeš

  • Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes

    Sina M. Adl;David Bass;David Bass;Christopher E. Lane;Julius Lukes;Julius Lukes

  • CBOL Protist Working Group: Barcoding Eukaryotic Richness beyond the Animal, Plant, and Fungal Kingdoms

    Jan Wojciech Pawlowski;Stéphane Audic;Sina Adl;David Bass

  • Evolutionary and geographical history of the Leishmania donovani complex with a revision of current taxonomy

    Julius Lukeš;Isabel L. Mauricio;Gabriele Schönian;Jean Claude Dujardin

  • A common red algal origin of the apicomplexan, dinoflagellate, and heterokont plastids.

    Jan Janouškovec;Aleš Horák;Miroslav Oborník;Julius Lukeš

  • The evolution and diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates

    Alastair G.B. Simpson;Jamie R. Stevens;Julius Lukeš

  • Kinetoplast DNA network: evolution of an improbable structure.

    Julius Lukeš;Julius Lukeš;D. Lys Guilbride;Jan Votýpka;Jan Votýpka;Alena Zíková;Alena Zíková

  • Leishmania infections: Molecular targets and diagnosis

    Mohammad Akhoundi;Tim Downing;Jan Votýpka;Katrin Kuhls

  • Microsporidia and ‘The Art of Living Together’

    Jiří Vávra;Julius Lukeš

  • Adaptations of Trypanosoma brucei to gradual loss of kinetoplast DNA: Trypanosoma equiperdum and Trypanosoma evansi are petite mutants of T. brucei.

    De-Hua Lai;Hassan Hashimi;Hassan Hashimi;Zhao-Rong Lun;Francisco J. Ayala

  • Phylogeny of trypanosomes as inferred from the small and large subunit rRNAs: implications for the evolution of parasitism in the trypanosomatid protozoa

    Dmitri A. Maslov;Julius Lukeš;Milan Jirku;Larry Simpson

  • Cell biology. Irremediable complexity

    M. W. Gray;J. Lukes;J. M. Archibald;P. J. Keeling

  • Evolution of parasitism in kinetoplastid flagellates

    Julius Lukeš;Julius Lukeš;Tomáš Skalický;Jiří Týč;Jan Votýpka

  • Unexplained complexity of the mitochondrial genome and transcriptome in kinetoplastid flagellates

    Julius Lukeš;Hassan Hashimi;Alena Zíková

  • Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites

    Yong H Woo;Hifzur Ansari;Thomas D Otto;Christen M Klinger

  • Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life

    Dave Speijer;Julius Lukeš;Julius Lukeš;Marek Eliáš

  • Diversity and phylogeny of insect trypanosomatids: all that is hidden shall be revealed.

    Dmitri A. Maslov;Jan Votýpka;Vyacheslav Yurchenko;Julius Lukeš

  • Are Human Intestinal Eukaryotes Beneficial or Commensals

    Julius Lukeš;Christen Rune Stensvold;Kateřina Jirků-Pomajbíková;Laura Wegener Parfrey

  • Author response: Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites

    Yong H Woo;Hifzur Ansari;Thomas D Otto;Christen M Klinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Vyacheslav Yurchenko
Vyacheslav Yurchenko University of Ostrava
Jan Votýpka
Jan Votýpka Charles University
Milan Jirků
Milan Jirků Czech Academy of Sciences
Miroslav Oborník
Miroslav Oborník Sewanee: The University of the South
David Modrý
David Modrý University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Patrick J. Keeling
Patrick J. Keeling University of British Columbia
Dmitri A. Maslov
Dmitri A. Maslov University of California, Riverside
Mark C. Field
Mark C. Field University of Dundee
Jan Šlapeta
Jan Šlapeta University of Sydney
Gertraud Burger
Gertraud Burger University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Molecular Biology, there are numerous online degree pathways that open doors to healthcare and research careers. If you are considering a transition to nursing, several of the best online bsn programs for non nurses offer an accelerated route to becoming a registered nurse, even for those without a prior nursing background.

After earning a BSN, many professionals pursue advanced practice roles by entering fast track nurse practitioner programs, which can shorten the timeline to a rewarding career as a nurse practitioner. For those currently working as registered nurses, enrolling in the shortest rn to bsn program can further advance your qualifications in as little as six months.

Career prospects in specialized nursing fields are strong. For example, understanding how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make can highlight the financial benefits of advanced roles in healthcare. By choosing the right online programs and career tracks, those with a background in Molecular Biology can quickly transition into impactful and well-compensated positions.

Best Scientists Citing Julius Lukeš

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles