World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
10339
World Ranking
4003
National Ranking
1402

Laura A. Katz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura A. Katz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 180 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Laura A. Katz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura A. Katz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura A. Katz is affiliated with Smith College in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Environmental Science as well. Within these fields, Katz has concentrated on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Ecology, Plant Science, Endocrinology, and Environmental Chemistry.

Key research topics include:

  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Laura A. Katz has published extensively in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Genome Biology and Evolution
  • Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • mBio
  • PLoS ONE

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Complementary Metagenomic Approaches Improve Reconstruction of Microbial Diversity in a Forest Soil," 2020, mSystems
  • "Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research," 2020, Microorganisms
  • "Updated Virophage Taxonomy and Distinction from Polinton-like Viruses," 2023, Biomolecules
  • "Phylogenomic Analyses of 2,786 Genes in 158 Lineages Support a Root of the Eukaryotic Tree of Life between Opisthokonts and All Other Lineages," 2022, Genome Biology and Evolution
  • "Epigenetics as Driver of Adaptation and Diversification in Microbial Eukaryotes," 2021, Frontiers in Genetics

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Xyrus X. Maurer-Alcalá
  • Agnes K. M. Weiner
  • Auden Cote-L'Heureux
  • Ragib Ahsan
  • Robin S. Sleith

Best Publications

  • The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): Illuminating the Functional Diversity of Eukaryotic Life in the Oceans through Transcriptome Sequencing

    Patrick J. Keeling;Patrick J. Keeling;Fabien Burki;Heather M. Wilcox;Bassem Allam

  • Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks

    Laura Wegener Parfrey;Daniel J. G. Lahr;Andrew H. Knoll;Laura A. Katz

  • Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life

    Cody E. Hinchliff;Stephen A. Smith;James F. Allman;J. Gordon Burleigh

  • Paper 2. agricultural impacts of and responses to climate change in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) region

    William E. Easterling;Pierre R. Crosson;Norman J. Rosenberg;Mary S. McKenney

  • Diversity and geographic distribution of ciliates (Protista: Ciliophora)

    Wilhelm Foissner;Anne Chao;Laura A. Katz

  • Broadly Sampled Multigene Analyses Yield a Well-Resolved Eukaryotic Tree of Life

    Laura Wegener Parfrey;Jessica Grant;Yonas I. Tekle;Yonas I. Tekle;Erica Lasek-Nesselquist;Erica Lasek-Nesselquist

  • Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity

    Laura Wegener Parfrey;Erika Barbero;Elyse Lasser;Micah Saul Dunthorn

  • Reducing the impact of PCR-mediated recombination in molecular evolution and environmental studies using a new-generation high-fidelity DNA polymerase.

    Daniel J. G. Lahr;Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz

  • The Dynamic Nature of Eukaryotic Genomes

    Laura Wegener Parfrey;Daniel J. G. Lahr;Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz

  • Broadly sampled multigene trees of eukaryotes.

    Hwan Su Yoon;Hwan Su Yoon;Jessica Grant;Yonas I Tekle;Min Wu

  • Molecular and morphological methods for identifying plankton: what makes a successful marriage?

    George B. Mcmanus;Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz

  • An introduction to the biogeography of aquatic microbes

    Published November;John R. Dolan;A. J. Baldwin;P. Catala

  • The chastity of amoebae: re-evaluating evidence for sex in amoeboid organisms

    Daniel J. G. Lahr;Laura Wegener Parfrey;Edward A. D. Mitchell;Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz

  • Reframing the Everything is everywhere debate: evidence for high gene flow and diversity in ciliate morphospecies

    Laura A. Katz;George B. McManus;Oona L. O. Snoeyenbos-West;Autumn Griffin

  • Insights into the diversity of choreotrich and oligotrich ciliates (Class: Spirotrichea) based on genealogical analyses of multiple loci.

    Oona L O Snoeyenbos-West;Tovah Salcedo;George B McManus;Laura A Katz

  • Widespread Distribution of Extensive Chromosomal Fragmentation in Ciliates

    Jennifer L. Riley;Laura A. Katz

  • Phylogenetic placement of diverse amoebae inferred from multigene analyses and assessment of clade stability within 'Amoebozoa' upon removal of varying rate classes of SSU-rDNA.

    Yonas I. Tekle;Jessica Grant;O. Roger Anderson;Thomas A. Nerad

  • Origin and Diversification of Eukaryotes

    Laura A. Katz

  • Insights into the phylogenetic and taxonomy of philasterid ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia) based on analyses of multiple molecular markers.

    Feng Gao;Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz;Weibo Song

  • Comprehensive Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Amoebozoa Based on Concatenated Analyses of SSU-rDNA and Actin Genes

    Daniel J. G. Lahr;Daniel J. G. Lahr;Jessica Grant;Truc Nguyen;Jian Hua Lin

  • Turning the Crown Upside Down: Gene Tree Parsimony Roots the Eukaryotic Tree of Life

    Laura A. Katz;Laura A. Katz;Jessica R. Grant;Laura Wegener Parfrey;Laura Wegener Parfrey;Laura Wegener Parfrey;J. Gordon Burleigh

Frequent Co-Authors

George B. McManus
George B. McManus University of Connecticut
Laura Wegener Parfrey
Laura Wegener Parfrey University of British Columbia
Micah Dunthorn
Micah Dunthorn University of Oslo
Weibo Song
Weibo Song Ocean University of China
David J. Patterson
David J. Patterson University of Sydney
Wilhelm Foissner
Wilhelm Foissner University of Salzburg
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Keith A. Crandall
Keith A. Crandall George Washington University
Douglas E. Soltis
Douglas E. Soltis University of Florida
Debashish Bhattacharya
Debashish Bhattacharya Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to rewarding career paths, sometimes intersecting with health, research, and policy fields. If you're interested in expanding your expertise, flexible online degrees offer accessible options for career advancement.

Many professionals are now leveraging bridge programs to accelerate their education. For those from associate-level nursing backgrounds, the asn to np pathway provides a streamlined route to advanced practice roles. Alternatively, individuals seeking a direct transition into nursing may consider direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which are designed for those without prior nursing experience.

Comparing schools is essential for finding the right fit. Evaluating programs such as chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program can help you understand different curriculum approaches and student outcomes. For those conscious of cost, there are also online bsn to msn programs that are both affordable and reputable.

Whether your ambition is research, patient care, or environmental policy, exploring related online degrees can support your goals and provide a flexible pathway into dynamic, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Laura A. Katz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles