World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 121 3558 3326 99 95 541 68201
Genetics 120 374 361 12 11 514 67363

Nicholas K. Hayward publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas K. Hayward between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas K. Hayward published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 17 papers a year. Output peaked at 198 publications in 2023. 19 of the 750 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 198. Peak 198 publications in 2023. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 198 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
1982 2025

750 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas K. Hayward: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 4
1989 4
1990 2
1991 5
1992 3
1993 3
1994 14
1995 17
1996 15
1997 19
1998 9
1999 6
2000 12
2001 14
2002 14
2003 13
2004 10
2005 16
2006 21
2007 23
2008 19
2009 15
2010 27
2011 25
2012 20
2013 21
2014 22
2015 30
2016 17
2017 20
2018 21
2019 26
2020 19
2021 15
2022 6
2023 198
2024 9
2025 10
Total 750
Download as CSV

Nicholas K. Hayward publications per year - data summary

  • Nicholas K. Hayward, a Genetics scholar from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, has 750 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 198 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1983, 1985 and 1987, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 44 years in the span carries no publications at all (1984).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.4 per year counting only the 43 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 238 publications, 32% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 73 publications (4.9 per year); 1997-2011: 243 publications (16.2 per year); 2012-2025: 434 publications (31.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Nicholas K. Hayward publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas K. Hayward sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 505–514 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 514 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12 514
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicholas K. Hayward publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Nicholas K. Hayward, a Genetics scholar from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, records 514 publications - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Nicholas K. Hayward, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Nicholas K. Hayward ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Nicholas K. Hayward D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas K. Hayward sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29 120
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Nicholas K. Hayward D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Nicholas K. Hayward, a Genetics scholar from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, records 120 D-Index - the 92nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 92% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Nicholas K. Hayward, and about 8% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Nicholas K. Hayward ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Australia Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Nicholas K. Hayward is affiliated with the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Immunology, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Whole-genome sequencing of acral melanoma reveals genomic complexity and diversity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Multiomic profiling of checkpoint inhibitor-treated melanoma: Identifying predictors of response and resistance, and markers of biological discordance, 2021, Cancer Cell
  • Whole genome landscapes of uveal melanoma show an ultraviolet radiation signature in iris tumours, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Anatomic position determines oncogenic specificity in melanoma, 2022, Nature
  • Comparative Genomics Provides Etiologic and Biological Insight into Melanoma Subtypes, 2022, Cancer Discovery

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nicholas K. Hayward include:

  • Peter A. Johansson
  • Graham J. Mann
  • Richard A. Scolyer
  • Antonia L. Pritchard
  • James S. Wilmott

Common publication venues for their research include:

  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
  • JAMA Dermatology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The main topics covered in their work are:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • CAR-T cell therapy research

Nicholas K. Hayward's research includes contributions to understanding melanoma through genomic sequencing, profiling of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and comparative genomic analyses. Their work spans both cutaneous and ocular forms of melanoma, including investigation into ultraviolet radiation signatures and oncogenic specificity related to tumor location.

Their multidisciplinary approach integrates genomics, cancer biology, immunology, and clinical oncology, reflected in a broad publication record across high-impact journals and collaboration with multiple researchers specializing in melanoma and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17

    M. Hutton;C. L. Lendon;P. Rizzu;M. Baker

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Genomic Classification of Cutaneous Melanoma

    Rehan Akbani;Kadir C. Akdemir;B. Arman Aksoy;Monique Albert

  • Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling

    M. Bittner;P.S.J. Meltzer;Y.D. Chen;Y. Jiang

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi.

    Pamela M. Pollock;Ursula L. Harper;Katherine S. Hansen;Laura M. Yudt

  • Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47.

    Carl A. Anderson;Gabrielle Boucher;Charlie W. Lees;Andre Franke

  • Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes

    Nicholas K. Hayward;Nicholas K. Hayward;James S. Wilmott;Nicola Waddell;Nicola Waddell;Peter A. Johansson

  • Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma.

    Michael Krauthammer;Yong Lin Kong;Byung Hak Ha;Perry Evans

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Germline mutations in the p16INK4a binding domain of CDK4 in familial melanoma.

    Lin Zuo;John Weger;Qingbei Yang;Alisa M. Goldstein

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies

    Jimmy Z. Liu;Allan F. Mcrae;Dale R. Nyholt;Sarah E. Medland

  • Identification of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) Gene. The European Consortium on MEN1

    Irma Lemmens;Wim J. M. Van de Ven;Koen Kas;Chang X. Zhang

  • Menin Associates with a Trithorax Family Histone Methyltransferase Complex and with the Hoxc8 Locus

    Christina M. Hughes;Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen;Thomas A. Milne;Terry D. Copeland

  • Geographical Variation in the Penetrance of CDKN2A Mutations for Melanoma

    D. Timothy Bishop;Florence Demenais;Alisa M. Goldstein;Wilma Bergman

  • Melanocortin-1 Receptor Polymorphisms and Risk of Melanoma: Is the Association Explained Solely by Pigmentation Phenotype?

    James S. Palmer;James S. Palmer;David L. Duffy;Neil F. Box;Joanne F. Aitken

  • A genome-wide association study identifies novel alleles associated with hair color and skin pigmentation.

    Jiali Han;Peter Kraft;Hongmei Nan;Hongmei Nan;Qun Guo;Qun Guo

  • A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma

    Satoru Yokoyama;Susan L. Woods;Glen M. Boyle;Lauren G. Aoude

  • Genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with melanoma risk.

    D Timothy Bishop;Florence Demenais;Mark M Iles;Mark Harland

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham J. Mann
Graham J. Mann Australian National University
David C. Whiteman
David C. Whiteman QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Richard A. Scolyer
Richard A. Scolyer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Kevin M. Brown
Kevin M. Brown National Institutes of Health
David L. Duffy
David L. Duffy QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Adèle C. Green
Adèle C. Green QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Georgina V. Long
Georgina V. Long University of Sydney
Nelleke A. Gruis
Nelleke A. Gruis Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths in healthcare, research, and administration. Many genetics graduates explore further education to expand their professional opportunities. For instance, some transition into nursing, but entry requirements vary—wondering is the teas test required for all nursing programs? Not always. Some nursing schools do not require the TEAS or HESI exams, making them more accessible.

For those interested in leadership or administrative roles within the healthcare sector, exploring the cheapest mha programs allows you to gain in-demand management skills without breaking the bank. Alternatively, if you prefer a more hands-on clinical pathway, there are accelerated options such as a 6 month lpn program online that helps you enter the workforce quickly.

For those committed to academia or advanced healthcare research, pursuing an online phd nursing programs can be a strategic choice, blending genetics expertise with advanced practice and research skills.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas K. Hayward

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles