World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
9050
World Ranking
8698
National Ranking
528

James Cheney publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Cheney sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

James Cheney D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Cheney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Cheney is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a substantial focus on subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's research covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Software Engineering Research

Cheney's publication record includes recent scholarly papers such as:

  • "A baseline for unsupervised advanced persistent threat detection in system-level provenance" (2020), published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "Lenses for Web Data" (2024), published by Technische Universität Berlin - Universitätsbibliothek
  • "A Formalization of SQL with Nulls" (2022), published in Journal of Automated Reasoning
  • "Cross-tier Web Programming for Curated Databases: a Case Study" (2020), published in International Journal of Digital Curation
  • "Hack me if you can: Aggregating autoencoders for countering persistent access threats within highly imbalanced data" (2024), published in Future Generation Computer Systems

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Cheney include:

  • Sidahmed Benabderrahmane
  • Wilmer Ricciotti
  • Sam Lindley
  • Simon Fowler
  • Petko Valtchev

The scientist's work has been regularly published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
  • International Journal of Digital Curation
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Best Publications

  • Cyclone: A Safe Dialect of C

    Trevor Jim;J. Greg Morrisett;Dan Grossman;Michael W. Hicks

  • Provenance in Databases: Why, How, and Where

    James Cheney;Laura Chiticariu;Wang-Chiew Tan

  • PROV-O: The PROV Ontology

    Timothy Lebo;Satya Sahoo;Deborah McGuinness;Khalid Belhajjame

  • Region-based memory management in cyclone

    Dan Grossman;Greg Morrisett;Trevor Jim;Michael Hicks

  • Provenance management in curated databases

    Peter Buneman;Adriane Chapman;James Cheney

  • PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model

    Khalid Belhajjame;Reza B'Far;James Cheney;Sam Coppens

  • A sequent calculus for nominal logic

    M. Gabbay;J. Cheney

  • Compressing XML with multiplexed hierarchical PPM models

    J. Cheney

  • First-Class Phantom Types

    James Cheney;Ralf Hinze

  • The W3C PROV family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata

    Paolo Missier;Khalid Belhajjame;James Cheney

  • Notions of Bidirectional Computation and Entangled State Monads

    Faris Abou-Saleh;James Cheney;Jeremy Gibbons;James McKinna

  • Curated databases

    Peter Buneman;James Cheney;Wang-Chiew Tan;Stijn Vansummeren

  • On the expressiveness of implicit provenance in query and update languages

    Peter Buneman;James Cheney;Stijn Vansummeren

  • On the expressiveness of implicit provenance in query and update languages

    Peter Buneman;James Cheney;Stijn Vansummeren

  • A lightweight implementation of generics and dynamics

    James Cheney;Ralf Hinze

  • Provenance: a future history

    James Cheney;Stephen Chong;Nate Foster;Margo Seltzer

  • The rationale of PROV

    Luc Moreau;Paul Groth;James Cheney;Timothy Lebo

  • PROV-O: The PROV ontology:W3C recommendation 30 April 2013

    Khalid Belhajjame;James Cheney;David Corsar;Daniel Garijo

  • A practical theory of language-integrated query

    James Cheney;Sam Lindley;Philip Wadler

  • YesWorkflow: A User-Oriented, Language-Independent Tool for Recovering Workflow Information from Scripts

    Timothy McPhillips;Tianhong Song;Tyler Kolisnik;Steve Aulenbach

  • αProlog: A Logic Programming Language with Names, Binding and α-Equivalence

    James Cheney;Christian Urban

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Buneman
Peter Buneman University of Edinburgh
Philip Wadler
Philip Wadler University of Edinburgh
Michael Hicks
Michael Hicks University of Maryland, College Park
Simon Miles
Simon Miles King's College London
Dan Grossman
Dan Grossman University of Washington
Paul Groth
Paul Groth University of Amsterdam
Luc Moreau
Luc Moreau King's College London
Paolo Missier
Paolo Missier Newcastle University
Michael Benedikt
Michael Benedikt University of Oxford
Greg Morrisett
Greg Morrisett Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to various related fields that offer flexible online learning. Many students diversify their skill set by considering specialized degrees that align with tech-driven industries.

Security is a growing concern, making an online master's degree cyber security program highly relevant. These degrees help prepare students for high-demand roles protecting data across multiple sectors.

For those interested in building and managing large-scale projects, an construction management degree combines technical knowledge with leadership skills. This pathway suits individuals aiming for project manager or consultant roles.

Various fields also require a strong understanding of regulations and finance. An criminal justice degree online cost is a popular query for those interested in law enforcement or public safety careers, while online accounting degree programs offer flexibility for those pursuing accountancy and financial analysis roles.

By pursuing related online degrees, you can expand your opportunities in tech, business, and administration—enhancing your potential career pathways in today’s digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing James Cheney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles