World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9660
World Ranking
7490
National Ranking
3258

Greg Morrisett publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Morrisett sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 126 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Greg Morrisett D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Morrisett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Fellow For contributions to mathematically-based methods for ensuring the efficient implementation and verification of practical programming languages.
  • 1998 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Greg Morrisett is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans 17 publications focusing on various subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, and Hardware and Architecture.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Recent papers authored by or involving Greg Morrisett cover a range of programming languages, cryptographic protocol proofs, and certified equivalence for protocol parsers. Selected publications include:

  • "A Core Calculus for Equational Proofs of Cryptographic Protocols," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Interval Parsing Grammars for File Format Parsing," 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Repository for Article 'A Core Calculus for Equational Proofs of Cryptographic Protocols'," 2023, Artifact Digital Object Group
  • "Leapfrog: Certified Equivalence for Protocol Parsers," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Morrisett include:

  • Daniel Huang
  • Bas Spitters
  • Joshua Gancher
  • Kristina Sojakova
  • Xiong Fan

The main venues for Morrisett's publications are:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Artifact Digital Object Group

Greg Morrisett has contributed to academic literature through at least one book published by Cambridge University Press, titled Foundations of Probabilistic Programming (2020), which has received citations.

Recognition for their work includes being named an ACM Fellow in 2013, awarded for contributions to mathematically based methods that ensure the efficient implementation and verification of practical programming languages. Morrisett was also a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 1998.

Best Publications

  • From system F to typed assembly language

    Greg Morrisett;David Walker;Karl Crary;Neal Glew

  • Region-based memory management in cyclone

    Dan Grossman;Greg Morrisett;Trevor Jim;Michael Hicks

  • TIL: a type-directed optimizing compiler for ML

    David Tarditi;Greg Morrisett;Perry Cheng;Chris Stone

  • Compiling polymorphism using intensional type analysis

    Robert Harper;Greg Morrisett

  • Attacking Malicious Code: A Report to the Infosec Research Council

    Gary McGraw;Greg Morrisett

  • From system F to typed assembly language

    Greg Morrisett;David Walker;Karl Crary;Neal Glew

  • The regiment macroprogramming system

    Ryan Newton;Greg Morrisett;Matt Welsh

  • TALx86: A Realistic Typed Assembly Language∗

    Greg Morrisett;Karl Crary;Neal Glew;Dan Grossman

  • Computability classes for enforcement mechanisms

    Kevin W. Hamlen;Greg Morrisett;Fred B. Schneider

  • Typed memory management in a calculus of capabilities

    Karl Crary;David Walker;Greg Morrisett

  • Typed closure conversion

    Yasuhiko Minamide;Greg Morrisett;Robert Harper

  • Evaluating SFI for a CISC architecture

    Stephen McCamant;Greg Morrisett

  • Ynot: dependent types for imperative programs

    Aleksandar Nanevski;Greg Morrisett;Avraham Shinnar;Paul Govereau

  • RockSalt: better, faster, stronger SFI for the x86

    Greg Morrisett;Gang Tan;Joseph Tassarotti;Jean-Baptiste Tristan

  • Hoare type theory, polymorphism and separation1

    Aleksandar Nanevski;Greg Morrisett;Lars Birkedal

  • Polymorphism and separation in hoare type theory

    Aleksandar Nanevski;Greg Morrisett;Lars Birkedal

  • Stack-Based Typed Assembly Language

    J. Gregory Morrisett;Karl Crary;Neal Glew;David Walker

  • Abstract models of memory management

    Greg Morrisett;Matthias Felleisen;Robert Harper

  • Intensional polymorphism in type-erasure semantics

    Karl Crary;Stephanie Weirich;Greg Morrisett

  • Compiling with Types

    Greg Morrisett

  • Alias Types for Recursive Data Structures (Extended Version)

    David Walker;Greg Morrisett

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Grossman
Dan Grossman University of Washington
David Walker
David Walker Princeton University
Robert Harper
Robert Harper Carnegie Mellon University
Gang Tan
Gang Tan Pennsylvania State University
Michael Hicks
Michael Hicks University of Maryland, College Park
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)
Lars Birkedal
Lars Birkedal Aarhus University
Shwetak N. Patel
Shwetak N. Patel University of Washington
Benjamin C. Pierce
Benjamin C. Pierce University of Pennsylvania
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, and online education has become a popular, flexible choice for many students. Choosing the best online accredited universities ensures the legitimacy and value of your degree, an important consideration for future employers.

The tech field is rapidly diversifying, with specialized online degrees catering to different interests. For aspiring game designers, pursuing a game design online degree can lead to creative roles in entertainment, education, and interactive media development. If cybersecurity is your aspiration, consider enrolling in the cheapest cybersecurity degree programs to gain vital skills while minimizing student debt.

Beyond traditional computer science, structured programs like an online construction management masters offer opportunities to apply technology in industries such as construction and infrastructure. Each pathway offers distinct advantages and job prospects, so be sure to align your studies with your long-term career goals and personal interests.

Best Scientists Citing Greg Morrisett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles