World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4729
World Ranking
13982
National Ranking
5555

Nikhil Swamy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikhil Swamy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nikhil Swamy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nikhil Swamy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nikhil Swamy is primarily affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields and topics, with a focus on computer science and materials science. The main areas of study include artificial intelligence, materials chemistry, electronic, optical and magnetic materials, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and computer networks and communications.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects, such as logic, programming, and type systems, distributed systems and fault tolerance, security and verification in computing, formal methods in verification, magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials, ferroelectric and piezoelectric materials, and multiferroics and related materials.

Recent publications by Nikhil Swamy include:

  • SteelCore: an extensible concurrent separation logic for effectful dependently typed programs, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Steel: proof-oriented programming in a dependently typed concurrent separation logic, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Review of Soft Computing Techniques in Monitoring Cardiovascular Disease in the Context of South Asian Countries, 2023, Applied Sciences
  • Duranta erecta leaf Extract-Mediated green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles with antimicrobial applications, 2025, Inorganic Chemistry Communications
  • Artifact for Steel: Proof-Oriented Programming in a Dependently Typed Concurrent Separation Logic, 2021, Artifact Digital Object Group

Frequent coauthors in their work include Aymeric Fromherz, Denis Merigoux, Guido Martínez, Tahina Ramananandro, and Sarah Fakhoury.

Common publication venues where their research appears include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
  • Artifact Digital Object Group
  • Applied Sciences

Best Publications

  • Formal Verification of Smart Contracts: Short Paper

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cédric Fournet;Anitha Gollamudi

  • Defeating script injection attacks with browser-enforced embedded policies

    Trevor Jim;Nikhil Swamy;Michael Hicks

  • Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F*

    Nikhil Swamy;Cătălin Hriţcu;Chantal Keller;Aseem Rastogi

  • Secure distributed programming with value-dependent types

    Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Cédric Fournet;Pierre-Yves Strub

  • Verified Security for Browser Extensions

    Arjun Guha;Matthew Fredrikson;Benjamin Livshits;Nikhil Swamy

  • Fable: A Language for Enforcing User-defined Security Policies

    N. Swamy;B.J. Corcoran;M. Hicks

  • Safe & Efficient Gradual Typing for TypeScript

    Aseem Rastogi;Nikhil Swamy;Cédric Fournet;Gavin Bierman

  • Quantum computing applications of genetic programming

    Lee Spector;Howard Barnum;Herbert J. Bernstein;Nikhil Swamy

  • Finding a better-than-classical quantum AND/OR algorithm using genetic programming

    L. Spector;H. Barnum;H.J. Bernstein;N. Swamy

  • Verifying higher-order programs with the dijkstra monad

    Nikhil Swamy;Joel Weinberger;Cole Schlesinger;Juan Chen

  • Verified Low-Level Programming Embedded in F*

    Jonathan Protzenko;Jean Karim Zinzindohoue;Aseem Rastogi;Tahina Ramananandro

  • Fully abstract compilation to JavaScript

    Cedric Fournet;Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Pierre-Evariste Dagand

  • Probabilistic relational verification for cryptographic implementations

    Gilles Barthe;Cédric Fournet;Benjamin Grégoire;Pierre-Yves Strub

  • Finding and removing performance bottlenecks in large systems

    Glenn Ammons;Jong-Deok Choi;Manish Gupta;Nikhil Swamy

  • Enforcing stateful authorization and information flow policies in fine

    Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Ravi Chugh

  • Implementing and Proving the TLS 1.3 Record Layer

    Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cedric Fournet;Markulf Kohlweiss;Jonathan Protzenko

  • Cross-tier, label-based security enforcement for web applications

    Brian J. Corcoran;Nikhil Swamy;Michael Hicks

  • Gradual typing embedded securely in JavaScript

    Nikhil Swamy;Cedric Fournet;Aseem Rastogi;Karthikeyan Bhargavan

  • Everest: Towards a Verified, Drop-in Replacement of HTTPS

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Barry Bond;Antoine Delignat-Lavaud;Cédric Fournet

  • Verified implementations of the information card federated identity-management protocol

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Cédric Fournet;Andrew D. Gordon;Nikhil Swamy

  • Secure distributed programming with value-dependent types

    Nikhil Swamy;Juan Chen;Cédric Fournet;Pierre-Yves Strub

  • EverCrypt: A Fast, Verified, Cross-Platform Cryptographic Provider.

    Jonathan Protzenko;Bryan Parno;Aymeric Fromherz;Chris Hawblitzel

Frequent Co-Authors

Cédric Fournet
Cédric Fournet Microsoft (United States)
Michael Hicks
Michael Hicks University of Maryland, College Park
Karthikeyan Bhargavan
Karthikeyan Bhargavan French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Markulf Kohlweiss
Markulf Kohlweiss University of Edinburgh
Bryan Parno
Bryan Parno Carnegie Mellon University
Benjamin Livshits
Benjamin Livshits Imperial College London
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)
David Walker
David Walker Princeton University
Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gordon Plotkin
Gordon Plotkin University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA provides a strong foundation, but exploring related online degrees can expand your opportunities and career pathways. For those seeking advanced qualifications in less time, consider pursuing one of the quickest cheapest masters degree options. These accelerated programs can help you upskill quickly while minimizing tuition costs and time away from work.

If you're aiming for long-term career growth, researching the most useful masters degrees is key. Computer Science consistently ranks among the most in-demand graduate programs, opening doors to roles in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data science, and software engineering.

Not ready for a master’s? An online associate degree can be a cost-effective way to enter the IT field, build practical skills, or prepare for further education. Associate programs are typically more affordable and flexible.

If budget is a priority, explore the most affordable online colleges. These institutions offer quality computer science programs designed to work with various budgets, helping you achieve your career goals without excessive student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Nikhil Swamy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles