World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
9470
World Ranking
8678
National Ranking
202

Bruno Blanchet publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Blanchet sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 89 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bruno Blanchet D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Blanchet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Blanchet is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France.

Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions across subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Bruno Blanchet's work covers various topics related to cryptographic security and systems. These include:

  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Information and Cyber Security

The scientist has published papers in several venues, reflecting a focus on security and theoretical computer science. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on security protocol verification and computational cryptography. Notable papers authored by Bruno Blanchet are:

  • The Security Protocol Verifier ProVerif and its Horn Clause Resolution Algorithm, 2022, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • ProVerif with Lemmas, Induction, Fast Subsumption, and Much More, 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • CryptoVerif: a Computationally-Sound Security Protocol Verifier (Initial Version with Communications on Channels), 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Additionally, they have contributed to the publication:

  • SoK: Computer-Aided Cryptography, 2023, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive (author Manuel Barbosa)

Their frequent coauthors include Joël Alwen, Eduard Hauck, Eike Kiltz, Benjamin Lipp, and Doreen Riepel, indicating collaboration within cryptographic and security research communities.

Best Publications

  • An efficient cryptographic protocol verifier based on prolog rules

    B. Blanchet

  • A static analyzer for large safety-critical software

    Bruno Blanchet;Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jérome Feret

  • Automated verification of selected equivalences for security protocols

    Bruno Blanchet;Martín Abadi;Cédric Fournet

  • A Computationally Sound Mechanized Prover for Security Protocols

    B. Blanchet

  • Escape analysis for object-oriented languages: application to Java

    Bruno Blanchet

  • Automated verification of selected equivalences for security protocols

    B. Blanchet;M. Abadi;C. Fournet

  • Modeling and Verifying Security Protocols with the Applied Pi Calculus and ProVerif

    Bruno Blanchet

  • Design and implementation of a special-purpose static program analyzer for safety-critical real-time embedded software

    Bruno Blanchet;Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jérôme Feret

  • Automatic verification of correspondences for security protocols

    Bruno Blanchet

  • Automatic proof of strong secrecy for security protocols

    B. Blanchet

  • Verified Models and Reference Implementations for the TLS 1.3 Standard Candidate

    Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Bruno Blanchet;Nadim Kobeissi

  • Analyzing security protocols with secrecy types and logic programs

    Martín Abadi;Bruno Blanchet

  • From Secrecy to Authenticity in Security Protocols

    Bruno Blanchet

  • Automated Verification for Secure Messaging Protocols and Their Implementations: A Symbolic and Computational Approach

    Nadim Kobeissi;Karthikeyan Bhargavan;Bruno Blanchet

  • The Applied Pi Calculus: Mobile Values, New Names, and Secure Communication

    Martín Abadi;Bruno Blanchet;Cédric Fournet

  • Secrecy Types for Asymmetric Communication

    Martín Abadi;Bruno Blanchet

  • Escape analysis for JavaTM: Theory and practice

    Bruno Blanchet

  • Analyzing security protocols with secrecy types and logic programs

    Martín Abadi;Bruno Blanchet

  • Automated security proofs with sequences of games

    Bruno Blanchet;David Pointcheval

  • ProVerif 1.85: Automatic Cryptographic Protocol Verifier, User Manual and Tutorial

    Bruno Blanchet;Ben Smyth

  • ProVerif 1.86: Automatic Cryptographic Protocol Verifier, User Manual and Tutorial

    Bruno Blanchet;Ben Smyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Martín Abadi
Martín Abadi Google (United States)
Cédric Fournet
Cédric Fournet Microsoft (United States)
Karthikeyan Bhargavan
Karthikeyan Bhargavan French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Radhia Cousot
Radhia Cousot Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Patrick Cousot
Patrick Cousot New York University
David Pointcheval
David Pointcheval École Normale Supérieure
Eike Kiltz
Eike Kiltz Ruhr University Bochum
Gilles Barthe
Gilles Barthe Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Bryan Parno
Bryan Parno Carnegie Mellon University
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous dynamic career pathways. For students interested in sustainable technology, pursuing an environmental science degree can lead to roles in environmental data analysis, green software development, and earth system modeling.

If you’re seeking a faster or more flexible option, a 2-year computer science degree online offers accelerated learning and direct entry into technology fields, making it ideal for career-changers or those already working.

Combining computer science with engineering disciplines is increasingly valuable. Students may consider an environmental engineering degree for opportunities in eco-friendly system design or sustainability projects. Similarly, a cheapest online master’s mechanical engineering program can enhance expertise in robotics, automation, or mechatronics.

By pursuing these interdisciplinary and affordable online degrees, students can amplify their skills, expand their career options, and adapt to the evolving tech-driven workplace.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Blanchet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles