World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
5006
World Ranking
12628
National Ranking
320

Steve Kremer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Kremer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steve Kremer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Kremer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Kremer is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a total of 29 publications. The work covers various subfields including Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their scientific contributions focus on multiple topics related to security and protocol verification. Key topics include:

  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Digital Rights Management and Security
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs

Steve Kremer's recent publications demonstrate sustained engagement with the analysis and verification of security protocols and their semantics. Selected publications include:

  • "An Extensive Formal Analysis of Multi-factor Authentication Protocols", 2021, ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • "On the semantics of communications when verifying equivalence properties", 2020, Journal of Computer Security
  • "Hash Gone Bad: Automated discovery of protocol attacks that exploit hash function weaknesses", 2023, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "SAPIC+: protocol verifiers of the world, unite!", 2023, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "Universal Equivalence and Majority of Probabilistic Programs over Finite Fields", 2021, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Their research work has appeared frequently in venues such as:

  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Journal of Computer Security
  • ACM SIGLOG News
  • ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Collaboration plays a notable role in their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Vincent Cheval
  • Charlie Jacomme
  • Itsaka Rakotonirina
  • Raphaëlle Crubillé
  • Kushal Babel

In addition to research articles, Steve Kremer has contributed to the book "Best practices from PhD to Professor" published by the European Organization for Nuclear Research in 2022.

Best Publications

  • An intensive survey of fair non-repudiation protocols

    Steve Kremer;Olivier Markowitch;Jianying Zhou

  • Verifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols

    Stéphanie Delaune;Steve Kremer;Mark Ryan

  • An efficient strong designated verifier signature scheme

    Shahrokh Saeednia;Steve Kremer;Olivier Markowitch

  • Analysis of an electronic voting protocol in the applied pi calculus

    Steve Kremer;Mark Ryan

  • Election verifiability in electronic voting protocols

    Steve Kremer;Mark Ryan;Ben Smyth

  • Coercion-resistance and receipt-freeness in electronic voting

    S. Delaune;S. Kremer;M. Ryan

  • A Game-Based Verification of Non-repudiation and Fair Exchange Protocols

    Steve Kremer;Jean-François Raskin

  • A game-based verification of non-repudiation and fair exchange protocols

    Steve Kremer;Jean-François Raskin

  • Automated Verification of Equivalence Properties of Cryptographic Protocols

    Rohit Chadha;Vincent Cheval;Ştefan Ciobâcă;Steve Kremer

  • Computing Knowledge in Security Protocols Under Convergent Equational Theories

    Ştefan Ciobâcă;Stéphanie Delaune;Steve Kremer

  • A Survey of Symbolic Methods in Computational Analysis of Cryptographic Systems

    Véronique Cortier;Steve Kremer;Bogdan Warinschi

  • Game analysis of abuse-free contract signing

    S. Kremer;J.-F. Raskin

  • Computationally sound implementations of equational theories against passive adversaries

    Mathieu Baudet;Véronique Cortier;Steve Kremer

  • Formal Analysis of Multiparty Contract Signing

    Rohit Chadha;Steve Kremer;Andre Scedrov

  • An Optimistic Non-repudiation Protocol with Transparent Trusted Third Party

    Olivier Markowitch;Steve Kremer

  • Automated verification of equivalence properties of cryptographic protocols

    Rohit Chadha;Ştefan Ciobâcă;Steve Kremer

  • A Multi-party Optimistic Non-repudiation Protocol

    Olivier Markowitch;Steve Kremer

  • A Multi-Party Non-Repudiation Protocol

    Steve Kremer;Olivier Markowitch

  • Optimistic non-repudiable information exchange

    Steve Kremer;Olivier Markowitch

  • Symbolic bisimulation for the applied pi calculus

    Stéphanie Delaune;Steve Kremer;Mark D. Ryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Ryan
Mark Ryan University of Birmingham
Véronique Cortier
Véronique Cortier Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-François Raskin
Jean-François Raskin Université Libre de Bruxelles
Bogdan Warinschi
Bogdan Warinschi University of Bristol
Michael Backes
Michael Backes University of Oxford
Gilles Barthe
Gilles Barthe Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy
Serge Vaudenay
Serge Vaudenay École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania
Jianying Zhou
Jianying Zhou Singapore University of Technology and Design
Pierrick Gaudry
Pierrick Gaudry University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open diverse doors for those studying Computer Science in the USA. An online associate's degree is a practical starting point, helping students build foundational knowledge while maintaining flexibility. Many learners also seek out affordable online colleges to minimize debt and maximize value.

Admission worries are common, but plenty of online colleges that accept low gpa provide pathways for those who may not meet traditional academic benchmarks. This ensures that students of varying backgrounds have opportunities to advance their education.

Computer Science majors can branch out with related disciplines, such as Environmental Science. Curious about diverse opportunities? See what can you do with an environmental science degree to better understand evolving career pathways.

Whether starting with an associate’s, seeking affordability, or considering alternative careers, online degrees make education more accessible for everyone.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Kremer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles