World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
21234
World Ranking
9931
National Ranking
237

Radhia Cousot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radhia Cousot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Radhia Cousot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radhia Cousot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Radhia Cousot was affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research career was conducted mainly within this institution, contributing to the academic and scientific community associated with CNRS.

While specific details about published papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not provided, the profile indicates their active participation in research without publicly documented recent papers or collaboration patterns available in this dataset.

No recorded book publications or information on particular fields, subfields, or topics of study are listed. Similarly, there are no awards documented for this scientist. The absence of such data suggests a focus on research activities not detailed here or a profile with incomplete public records.

As the scientist is deceased, all references are provided in the past tense, respecting the factual and neutral presentation of their academic presence.

Best Publications

  • Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Systematic design of program analysis frameworks

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Abstract Interpretation Frameworks

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Abstract interpretation and application to logic programs

    Patrick Cousot;Rahida Cousot

  • A static analyzer for large safety-critical software

    Bruno Blanchet;Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jérome Feret

  • Static determination of dynamic properties of programs

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • The ASTREÉ analyzer

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jerôme Feret;Laurent Mauborgne

  • Comparing the Galois Connection and Widening/Narrowing Approaches to Abstract Interpretation

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Constructive versions of tarski's fixed point theorems

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Design and implementation of a special-purpose static program analyzer for safety-critical real-time embedded software

    Bruno Blanchet;Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jérôme Feret

  • Inductive definitions, semantics and abstract interpretations

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Static determination of dynamic properties of recursive procedures

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Modular Static Program Analysis

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Systematic design of program transformation frameworks by abstract interpretation

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Higher-order abstract interpretation (and application to comportment analysis generalizing strictness, termination, projection and PER analysis of functional languages)

    P. Cousot;R. Cousot

  • A parametric segmentation functor for fully automatic and scalable array content analysis

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Francesco Logozzo

  • Automatic synthesis of optimal invariant assertions: Mathematical foundations

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • ANDROMEDA: accurate and scalable security analysis of web applications

    Omer Tripp;Marco Pistoia;Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

  • Combination of abstractions in the ASTRÉE static analyzer

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot;Jérôme Feret;Laurent Mauborgne

  • Temporal abstract interpretation

    Patrick Cousot;Radhia Cousot

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Cousot
Patrick Cousot New York University
Bruno Blanchet
Bruno Blanchet French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students find value in diversifying their skillset by pursuing fields with strong connections to technology and engineering.

For those interested in sustainability and technology, an online environmental engineering degree can lead to careers focused on solving environmental challenges. Similarly, a foundation in engineering is advantageous–an online mechanical engineering degree gives graduates training in problem-solving and design, skills highly valued in tech-driven industries.

If your interests lean towards the theoretical, consider online physics degrees to develop strong analytical and quantitative skills. Data science is another high-demand path with significant overlap; the cheapest master in data science programs make this specialization accessible and are a practical choice for those pursuing a tech career.

No matter your chosen field, these interdisciplinary pathways can enrich your tech education and expand your career opportunities within and beyond computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Radhia Cousot

Recently Published Articles