World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4826
World Ranking
11752
National Ranking
581

Helmut Seidl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Seidl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Helmut Seidl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmut Seidl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helmut Seidl is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and has a research profile focused on Computer Science, with particular attention to its subfields of Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Hardware and Architecture, and Information Systems.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics and include:

  • Three improvements to the top-down solver, 2021, published in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
  • Non-numerical weakly relational domains, 2024, published in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer

Seidl's work is associated with notable publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Information Processing Letters
  • Mathematical Structures in Computer Science

Their research topics cover multiple areas, such as:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Semigroups and automata theory
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Software Engineering Research

Helmut Seidl has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Michael Schwarz, Julian Erhard, Sarah Tilscher, Simmo Saan, and Vesal Vojdani.

Additionally, Helmut Seidl contributed to book publications, including a work released by Springer Science+Business Media titled Developments in Language Theory in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Precise interprocedural analysis through linear algebra

    Markus Müller-Olm;Helmut Seidl

  • Deciding equivalence of finite tree automata

    Helmut Seidl

  • On the complexity of equational horn clauses

    Kumar Neeraj Vermal;Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick

  • Exact XML Type Checking in Polynomial Time

    Sebastian Maneth;Thomas Perst;Helmut Seidl

  • On the complexity of equational horn clauses

    Kumar Neeraj Verma;Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick

  • XML type checking with macro tree transducers

    S. Maneth;A. Berlea;T. Perst;H. Seidl

  • Computing polynomial program invariants

    Markus Müller-Olm;Helmut Seidl

  • On the degree of ambiguity of finite automata

    Andreas Weber;Helmut Seidl

  • Counting in Trees for Free

    Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick;Anca Muscholl;Peter Habermehl

  • Haskell overloading is DEXPTIME-complete

    Helmut Seidl

  • Locating Matches of Tree Patterns in Forests

    Andreas Neumann;Helmut Seidl

  • A Note on Karr’s Algorithm

    Markus Müller-Olm;Helmut Seidl

  • Precise fixpoint computation through strategy iteration

    Thomas Gawlitza;Helmut Seidl

  • Macro forest transducers

    Thomas Perst;Helmut Seidl

  • Numerical document queries

    Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick;Anca Muscholl

  • A succinct solver for ALFP

    Flemming Nielson;Hanne Riis Nielson;Helmut Seidl

  • Propagating differences: an efficient new fixpoint algorithm for distributive constraint systems

    Christian Fecht;Helmut Seidl

  • Model checking information flow in reactive systems

    Rayna Dimitrova;Bernd Finkbeiner;Máté Kovács;Markus N. Rabe

  • Analysis of modular arithmetic

    Markus Müller-Olm;Helmut Seidl

  • Tree automata for code selection

    Christian Ferdinand;Helmut Seidl;Reinhard Wilhelm

Frequent Co-Authors

Reinhard Wilhelm
Reinhard Wilhelm Saarland University
Bernd Finkbeiner
Bernd Finkbeiner Saarland University
Flemming Nielson
Flemming Nielson Technical University of Denmark
Hanne Riis Nielson
Hanne Riis Nielson Technical University of Denmark
Thomas Schwentick
Thomas Schwentick TU Dortmund University
Joost Engelfriet
Joost Engelfriet Leiden University
Bernhard Steffen
Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University
Martin Hofmann
Martin Hofmann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Aditya V. Nori
Aditya V. Nori Microsoft (United States)
Martin Leucker
Martin Leucker University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up diverse career pathways and complementary credentials. Many students opt to enhance their qualifications with flexible, online education options. For those with leadership ambitions, pursuing affordable online executive mba programs can provide vital business management skills that pair well with technical expertise.

Interested in information management or research? A library science degree delves into organizing, preserving, and accessing digital knowledge—highly valued in today’s tech-driven world.

There’s also a growing range of affordable master's degrees online across technology, business, and data analysis disciplines. These programs offer the flexibility to learn at your own pace and tailor your studies to emerging fields.

For those aiming for senior leadership or academic roles, consider a phd organizational leadership. This doctorate prepares graduates for high-level strategy and research positions, which complement advanced tech credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Helmut Seidl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles