World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5564
World Ranking
10316
National Ranking
98

Frank Neven publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Neven sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frank Neven D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Neven sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Neven is affiliated with Hasselt University in Belgium, where they conduct research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans various subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Signal Processing, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in Frank Neven's research include:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Security and Verification in Computing

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by Frank Neven demonstrates a multidisciplinary approach and contributions to various aspects of data systems and biomedical informatics. These include:

  • Using natural language processing for automated classification of disease and to identify misclassified ICD codes in cardiac disease, 2024, published in European Heart Journal - Digital Health
  • Robustness Against Read Committed for Transaction Templates with Functional Constraints, 2022, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Population age and household structures shape transmission dynamics of emerging infectious diseases: a longitudinal microsimulation approach, 2023, published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Concurrency control for database theorists, 2023, published in ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Deciding Robustness for Lower SQL Isolation Levels, 2022, published in ACM Transactions on Database Systems

Frank Neven frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • ACM Transactions on Database Systems
  • European Heart Journal - Digital Health

Collaborations appear to be an important part of their research activities, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Brecht Vandevoort
  • Bas Ketsman
  • Stijn Vansummeren
  • Niel Hens
  • Marcel Parciak

Best Publications

  • Finite state machines for strings over infinite alphabets

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Victor Vianu

  • XPath Containment in the Presence of Disjunction, DTDs, and Variables

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Automata theory for XML researchers

    Frank Neven

  • Automata, Logic, and XML

    Frank Neven

  • DTDs versus XML schema: a practical study

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Jan Van den Bussche

  • Expressiveness and complexity of XML Schema

    Wim Martens;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Geert Jan Bex

  • Inference of concise DTDs from XML data

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Karl Tuyls

  • Query automata over finite trees

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Learning Deterministic Regular Expressions for the Inference of Schemas from XML Data

    Geert Jan Bex;Wouter Gelade;Frank Neven;Stijn Vansummeren

  • Inferring XML schema definitions from XML data

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Stijn Vansummeren

  • Expressive and Efficient Pattern Languages for Tree-Structured Data.

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Learning deterministic regular expressions for the inference of schemas from XML data

    Geert Jan Bex;Wouter Gelade;Frank Neven;Stijn Vansummeren

  • A formal model for an expressive fragment of XSLT

    Geert Jan Bex;Sebastian Maneth;Frank Neven

  • On The Complexity Of Xpath Containment In The Presence Of Disjunction, Dtds, And Variables

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Inference of concise regular expressions and DTDs

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Stijn Vansummeren

  • XML with data values: typechecking revisited

    Noga Alon;Tova Milo;Frank Neven;Dan Suciu

  • Frontiers of tractability for typechecking simple XML transformations

    Wim Martens;Frank Neven

  • Relational transducers for declarative networking

    Tom J. Ameloot;Frank Neven;Jan Van Den Bussche

  • Frontiers of tractability for typechecking simple XML transformations

    Wim Martens;Frank Neven

  • Towards Regular Languages over Infinite Alphabets

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Victor Vianu

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Schwentick
Thomas Schwentick TU Dortmund University
Jan Van den Bussche
Jan Van den Bussche Hasselt University
Victor Vianu
Victor Vianu University of California, San Diego
Dan Suciu
Dan Suciu University of Washington
Floris Geerts
Floris Geerts University of Antwerp
Tova Milo
Tova Milo Tel Aviv University
Leonid Libkin
Leonid Libkin University of Edinburgh
Wenfei Fan
Wenfei Fan University of Edinburgh
Serge Abiteboul
Serge Abiteboul École Normale Supérieure
Noga Alon
Noga Alon Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse, flexible learning options and career routes. For those seeking to maximize career prospects, consider programs that are known as the best masters degree to get. These advanced qualifications can give you an edge in fields like data science, software engineering, and cybersecurity.

If you're looking to start your academic journey or switch careers, associates degrees online in Computer Science or related areas offer a practical, affordable entry point. These programs provide foundational skills and are suitable for those balancing work and study.

Cost is often a concern, but there are many opportunities to pursue the cheapest online degrees without sacrificing quality. Affordable study paths make it easier for students from all backgrounds to access top education and grow their careers.

Even if your academic record includes a few stumbles, many online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa provide a second chance. These programs are designed for motivated students eager to advance, regardless of prior GPA.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Neven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles