World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reinhard Wilhelm

Reinhard Wilhelm

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
13569
World Ranking
6694
National Ranking
319

Reinhard Wilhelm publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhard Wilhelm sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Reinhard Wilhelm D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhard Wilhelm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - ACM Distinguished Service Award For two decades of exceptional service as Scientific Director of Schloss Dagstuhl, a stimulating environment for advancing research in informatics.
  • 2008 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2000 - ACM Fellow For important contributions in the field of compilers, particularly code-generator generators and program analysis, and for outstanding service as Scientific Director of Schloss Dagstuhl.

Overview

Reinhard Wilhelm is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with particular emphasis on hardware and architecture, artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, control and systems engineering, and statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems

Reinhard Wilhelm has published in various venues, frequently contributing to Informatik-Spektrum, Formal Aspects of Computing, Communications of the ACM, IT Professional, and WiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium.

Recent papers include:

  • Principles of Abstract Interpretation, 2022, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • Foundations of programming languages, 2021, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • Real time spent on real time, 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • Determining Reliable and Precise Execution Time Bounds of Real-Time Software, 2020, IT Professional
  • Einsichten eines Informatikers von geringem Verstande, 2020, Informatik-Spektrum

Frequent co-authors of Reinhard Wilhelm include Daniel L. Kastner, Christian Ferdinand, Christian Geyer, Benjamin Mohren, and Susanne Albers.

Among their honors, Reinhard Wilhelm received the ACM Distinguished Service Award in 2010 for two decades of service as Scientific Director of Schloss Dagstuhl. They became a member of the Academia Europaea in 2008 and were named an ACM Fellow in 2000 for contributions in compilers, program analysis, and service as Scientific Director of Schloss Dagstuhl.

Best Publications

  • The worst-case execution-time problem—overview of methods and survey of tools

    Reinhard Wilhelm;Jakob Engblom;Andreas Ermedahl;Niklas Holsti

  • Parametric shape analysis via 3-valued logic

    Mooly Sagiv;Thomas Reps;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Parametric shape analysis via 3-valued logic

    Mooly Sagiv;Thomas Reps;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Solving shape-analysis problems in languages with destructive updating

    Mooly Sagiv;Thomas Reps;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Reliable and Precise WCET Determination for a Real-Life Processor

    Christian Ferdinand;Reinhold Heckmann;Marc Langenbach;Florian Martin

  • Fast and Precise WCET Prediction by Separated Cache andPath Analyses

    Henrik Theiling;Christian Ferdinand;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • The influence of processor architecture on the design and the results of WCET tools

    R. Heckmann;M. Langenbach;S. Thesing;R. Wilhelm

  • Efficient and Precise Cache Behavior Prediction for Real-TimeSystems

    Christian Ferdinand;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Memory Hierarchies, Pipelines, and Buses for Future Architectures in Time-Critical Embedded Systems

    R. Wilhelm;D. Grund;J. Reineke;M. Schlickling

  • Timing predictability of cache replacement policies

    Jan Reineke;Daniel Grund;Christoph Berg;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • A Definition and Classification of Timing Anomalies

    Jan Reineke;Björn Wachter;Stephan Thesing;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Cache Behavior Prediction by Abstract Interpretation

    Martin Alt;Christian Ferdinand;Florian Martin;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Shape Analysis

    Unknown

  • Design for Timing Predictability

    Lothar Thiele;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Putting static analysis to work for verification: A case study

    Tal Lev-Ami;Thomas Reps;Mooly Sagiv;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Applying Compiler Techniques to Cache Behavior Prediction

    Christian Ferdinand;Florian Martin;Reinhard Wilhelm

  • Shape Analysis

    Reinhard Wilhelm;Shmuel Sagiv;Thomas W. Reps

  • Building timing predictable embedded systems

    Philip Axer;Rolf Ernst;Heiko Falk;Alain Girault

  • A semantics for procedure local heaps and its abstractions

    Noam Rinetzky;Jörg Bauer;Thomas Reps;Mooly Sagiv

  • Cache behavior prediction by abstract interpretation

    Christian Ferdinand;Florian Martin;Reinhard Wilhelm;Martin Alt

  • On Predicting Data Cache Behavior for Real-Time Systems

    Christian Ferdinand;Reinhard Wilhelm

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Reps
Thomas Reps University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mooly Sagiv
Mooly Sagiv Tel Aviv University
Helmut Seidl
Helmut Seidl Technical University of Munich
Kurt Mehlhorn
Kurt Mehlhorn Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Eran Yahav
Eran Yahav Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Robert Giegerich
Robert Giegerich Bielefeld University
Lothar Thiele
Lothar Thiele ETH Zurich
Wang Yi
Wang Yi Uppsala University
Moshe Y. Vardi
Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a variety of flexible online education options. Many students start with online associates degrees, which offer an accessible entry point into the field and can often be completed in two years. These programs provide foundational skills and can be a step toward a bachelor’s degree or an entry-level tech role.

Cost remains an important factor for many aspiring students. It’s possible to find affordable online colleges that deliver quality education without overwhelming tuition fees. Financial planning and comparing programs can help you find options that fit your budget.

Don't let academic challenges deter you—some students may need to search for a college that accepts low gpa. These institutions offer valuable opportunities for learners who may not have a perfect academic record but are committed to advancing their education.

Additionally, computer science skills are valued across many industries. For example, people often ask, what can you do with an environmental science degree? Increasingly, there’s an overlap between tech and fields like environmental science, offering even more career pathways for computer science graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Reinhard Wilhelm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles