World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert Giegerich

Robert Giegerich

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
13460
World Ranking
8601
National Ranking
422

Robert Giegerich publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Giegerich sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert Giegerich D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Giegerich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Giegerich is affiliated with Bielefeld University in Germany. Their academic profile currently does not list recent publications, co-authors, or specific fields and topics of study. There is also no information on awards or book publications associated with their name.

Without specific data on research papers, co-authors, publication venues, fields, subfields, or topics, a detailed overview of their research focus and contributions cannot be provided.

Best Publications

  • REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale.

    Stefan Kurtz;Jomuna V. Choudhuri;Enno Ohlebusch;Chris Schleiermacher

  • GenDB—an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes

    Folker Meyer;Alexander Goesmann;Alice C. McHardy;Daniela Bartels

  • A comprehensive comparison of comparative RNA structure prediction approaches

    Paul P Gardner;Robert Giegerich

  • Design, implementation and evaluation of a practical pseudoknot folding algorithm based on thermodynamics

    Jens Reeder;Robert Giegerich

  • RNAshapes: an integrated RNA analysis package based on abstract shapes

    Peter Steffen;Björn Voß;Marc Rehmsmeier;Jens Reeder

  • Local similarity in RNA secondary structures

    M. Hochsmann;T. Toller;R. Giegerich;S. Kurtz

  • From Ukkonen to McCreight and Weiner: A Unifying View of Linear-Time Suffix Tree Construction

    Robert Giegerich;Stefan Kurtz

  • Abstract shapes of RNA

    Robert Giegerich;Björn Voß;Marc Rehmsmeier

  • GeneFisher-Software Support for the Detection of Postulated Genes

    Robert Giegerich;Folker Meyer;Chris Schleiermacher

  • Efficient implementation of lazy suffix trees

    Robert Giegerich;Stefan Kurtz;Jens Stoye

  • Fast index based algorithms and software for matching position specific scoring matrices

    Michael Beckstette;Robert Homann;Robert Giegerich;Stefan Kurtz

  • Pure Multiple RNA Secondary Structure Alignments: A Progressive Profile Approach

    Matthias Höchsmann;Björn Voss;Robert Giegerich

  • Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration II. Structures of neutral networks and shape space covering

    Walter Grüner;Robert Giegerich;Dirk Strothmann;Christian Reidys

  • Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration I. Neutral networks

    Walter Grüner;Robert Giegerich;Dirk Strothmann;Christian Reidys

  • Attribute coupled grammars

    Harald Ganzinger;Robert Giegerich

  • The RNA shapes studio

    Stefan Janssen;Robert Giegerich

  • pknotsRG: RNA pseudoknot folding including near-optimal structures and sliding windows

    Jens Reeder;Peter Steffen;Robert Giegerich

  • A discipline of dynamic programming over sequence data

    Robert Giegerich;Carsten Meyer;Peter Steffen

  • Analysis of RNA Sequence Structure Maps by Exhaustive Enumeration

    Walter Gruner;Robert Giegerich;Dirk Strothmann;Christian Reidys

  • Consensus shapes: an alternative to the Sankoff algorithm for RNA consensus structure prediction

    Jens Reeder;Robert Giegerich

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Kurtz
Stefan Kurtz Universität Hamburg
Jens Stoye
Jens Stoye Bielefeld University
Peter F. Stadler
Peter F. Stadler Leipzig University
Anke Becker
Anke Becker Philipp University of Marburg
Alexander Goesmann
Alexander Goesmann University of Giessen
Reinhard Wilhelm
Reinhard Wilhelm Saarland University
Ivo L. Hofacker
Ivo L. Hofacker University of Vienna
Folker Meyer
Folker Meyer Argonne National Laboratory
Jörn Kalinowski
Jörn Kalinowski Bielefeld University
Susan L. Graham
Susan L. Graham University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities. Many students also consider related fields and interdisciplinary studies, especially through flexible online degree programs. Cost and flexibility are important factors—many leading options are available fully online, sometimes at significantly reduced tuition rates.

For those interested in law enforcement or public safety, exploring the cheapest online criminal justice degrees can be a practical alternative. Similarly, understanding the cost of accounting degree programs can help students balance financial planning with their long-term goals.

Data science is another fast-growing field closely tied to computer science. Discover the best data science master's programs to gain advanced analytical and programming skills. Meanwhile, tech-savvy students interested in management roles may benefit from an accelerated construction management degree, preparing for leadership opportunities in the construction industry.

Exploring these alternative online degrees allows students to align their education with their career ambitions—all while maintaining the flexibility to study at their own pace and manage costs.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Giegerich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles