World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7111 6905 3119 3001 261 10203

Olivier Pietquin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olivier Pietquin between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olivier Pietquin published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2011. 18 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2011. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 6 publications
2002 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olivier Pietquin: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 13
2009 15
2010 20
2011 33
2012 19
2013 17
2014 15
2015 13
2016 15
2017 17
2018 12
2019 10
2020 12
2021 16
2022 13
2023 9
2024 12
2025 6
Total 284
Download as CSV

Olivier Pietquin publications per year - data summary

  • Olivier Pietquin, a Computer Science scholar from Google (United States), has 284 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2002 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2003 and 2004, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 11.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.8 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 56 publications, 20% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2002-2009: 45 publications (5.6 per year); 2010-2017: 149 publications (18.6 per year); 2018-2025: 90 publications (11.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Olivier Pietquin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Pietquin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 252–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 261 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377 261
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Olivier Pietquin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Olivier Pietquin, a Computer Science scholar from Google (United States), records 261 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Olivier Pietquin, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Olivier Pietquin ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Olivier Pietquin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Pietquin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Olivier Pietquin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Olivier Pietquin, a Computer Science scholar from Google (United States), records 45 D-Index - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Olivier Pietquin, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Olivier Pietquin falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Olivier Pietquin is affiliated with Google in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of computer science. Their scholarly output spans several subfields including artificial intelligence, management science and operations research, signal processing, economics and econometrics, as well as control and systems engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as reinforcement learning in robotics, topic modeling, natural language processing techniques, advanced bandit algorithms research, music and audio processing, game theory and applications, and adversarial robustness in machine learning.

The following recent papers represent a selection of their published work:

  • AudioLM: A Language Modeling Approach to Audio Generation (2023), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Study (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Speak, Read and Prompt: High-Fidelity Text-to-Speech with Minimal Supervision (2023), Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Primal Wasserstein Imitation Learning (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Munchausen Reinforcement Learning (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaborative work is a notable aspect of their research activity, with frequent coauthors including Matthieu Geist, Mathieu Laurière, Florian Strub, Julien Pérolat, and Romuald Élie.

The scientist's research has appeared often in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), where the highest number of publications was recorded. Other frequent publication venues include the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, and Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

Best Publications

  • Noisy Networks For Exploration

    Meire Fortunato;Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar;Bilal Piot;Jacob Menick

  • Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewards

    Matej Vecerík;Todd Hester;Jonathan Scholz;Fumin Wang

  • Deep Q-learning from Demonstrations

    Todd Hester;Matej Vecerik;Olivier Pietquin;Marc Lanctot

  • Deep Q-learning From Demonstrations.

    Todd Hester;Matej Vecerík;Olivier Pietquin;Marc Lanctot

  • Modulating early visual processing by language

    Harm de Vries;Florian Strub;Jeremie Mary;Hugo Larochelle

  • GuessWhat?! Visual Object Discovery through Multi-modal Dialogue

    Harm de Vries;Florian Strub;Sarath Chandar;Olivier Pietquin

  • A probabilistic framework for dialog simulation and optimal strategy learning

    O. Pietquin;T. Dutoit

  • Listen and Translate: A Proof of Concept for End-to-End Speech-to-Text Translation

    Alexandre Bérard;Olivier Pietquin;Laurent Besacier;Christophe Servan

  • End-to-End Automatic Speech Translation of Audiobooks

    Alexandre Berard;Laurent Besacier;Ali Can Kocabiyikoglu;Olivier Pietquin

  • Listen and Translate: A Proof of Concept for End-to-End Speech-to-Text Translation

    Alexandre Berard;Olivier Pietquin;Christophe Servan;Laurent Besacier

  • Learning from Demonstrations for Real World Reinforcement Learning

    Todd Hester;Matej Vecerík;Olivier Pietquin;Marc Lanctot

  • Machine learning for spoken dialogue systems

    Oliver Lemon;Olivier Pietquin

  • A survey on metrics for the evaluation of user simulations

    Olivier Pietquin;Helen F. Hastie

  • Speak, Read and Prompt: High-Fidelity Text-to-Speech with Minimal Supervision

    Unknown

  • Observe and Look Further: Achieving Consistent Performance on Atari

    Tobias Pohlen;Bilal Piot;Todd Hester;Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar

  • End-to-end optimization of goal-driven and visually grounded dialogue systems

    Florian Strub;Harm de Vries;Jérémie Mary;Bilal Piot

  • Sample-efficient batch reinforcement learning for dialogue management optimization

    Olivier Pietquin;Matthieu Geist;Senthilkumar Chandramohan;Hervé Frezza-Buet

  • User Simulation in Dialogue Systems Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning.

    Senthilkumar Chandramohan;Matthieu Geist;Fabrice Lefèvre;Olivier Pietquin

  • Kalman temporal differences

    Matthieu Geist;Olivier Pietquin

  • Inverse Reinforcement Learning through Structured Classification

    Edouard Klein;Matthieu Geist;Bilal Piot;Olivier Pietquin

  • End-to-end optimization of goal-driven and visually grounded dialogue systems Harm de Vries

    Florian Strub;Harm de Vries;Jeremie Mary;Bilal Piot

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron Courville
Aaron Courville University of Montreal
Rémi Munos
Rémi Munos French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Laurent Besacier
Laurent Besacier Grenoble Alpes University
Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Thierry Dutoit
Thierry Dutoit University of Mons
Hugo Larochelle
Hugo Larochelle Google (United States)
Steve Young
Steve Young University of Cambridge
Joel Z. Leibo
Joel Z. Leibo DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Marc Lanctot
Marc Lanctot DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Tom Schaul
Tom Schaul DeepMind (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond a traditional Computer Science degree, students have a range of flexible online options to advance their tech careers. For those interested in analytics, check out data science programs that offer affordable online study, equipping graduates for roles in big data and machine learning.

If hardware and systems interest you, consider enrolling in top electrical engineering online tuition costs programs, where you can compare costs and potential outcomes for this in-demand field.

Fast-tracking your career is possible through easy certifications that pay well. These streamlined programs can be completed in a matter of months, helping you qualify for specialized technology roles quickly.

If an advanced credential is your goal but time is a concern, many professionals opt for one of the fastest masters degree online programs. These intensive courses are designed to let you earn your Master’s in a year or less, boosting your expertise and employability.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Pietquin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles