World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 44 7480 7261 371 359 111 9848

Milica Gasic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Milica Gasic between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Milica Gasic published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2018. 13 of the 147 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2018. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
2008 2025

147 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Milica Gasic: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 5
2010 7
2011 4
2012 6
2013 6
2014 8
2015 10
2016 12
2017 12
2018 18
2019 5
2020 9
2021 6
2022 13
2023 9
2024 8
2025 5
Total 147
Download as CSV

Milica Gasic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milica Gasic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 111 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 111
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Milica Gasic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milica Gasic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 44
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Milica Gasic is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research is primarily situated within the broad field of Computer Science, with a particular concentration on Artificial Intelligence. Other subfields of study include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Social Psychology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work extensively explores several main topics, such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Milica Gasic has contributed to numerous research papers published in various venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Report from the NSF Future Directions Workshop on Automatic Evaluation of Dialog: Research Directions and Challenges," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "TripPy: A Triple Copy Strategy for Value Independent Neural Dialog State Tracking," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Robust Dialogue State Tracking with Weak Supervision and Sparse Data," 2022, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • "EmoWOZ: A Large-Scale Corpus and Labelling Scheme for Emotion Recognition in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Dynamic Dialogue Policy for Continual Reinforcement Learning," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Milica Gasic include:

  • Michael Heck
  • Carel van Niekerk
  • Nurul Lubis
  • Hsien-chin Lin
  • Christian Geishauser

Publications appear most often in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • AI Magazine

Best Publications

  • Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systems

    Tsung-Hsien Wen;Milica Gasic;Nikola Mrkšić;Pei-Hao Su

  • MultiWOZ - A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling

    Paweł Budzianowski;Tsung-Hsien Wen;Bo-Hsiang Tseng;Iñigo Casanueva

  • POMDP-Based Statistical Spoken Dialog Systems: A Review

    S. Young;M. Gasic;B. Thomson;J. D. Williams

  • A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System

    Tsung-Hsien Wen;David Vandyke;Nikola Mrksic;Milica Gasic

  • The Hidden Information State model: A practical framework for POMDP-based spoken dialogue management

    Steve Young;Milica Gašić;Simon Keizer;François Mairesse

  • Counter-fitting word vectors to linguistic constraints

    Nikola Mrksic;Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha;Blaise Thomson;Milica Gasic

  • Semantic Specialization of Distributional Word Vector Spaces using Monolingual and Cross-Lingual Constraints

    Nikola Mrksic;Nikola Mrksic;Ivan Vulic;Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha;Ira Leviant

  • Multi-domain Neural Network Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systems

    Tsung-Hsien Wen;Milica Gasic;Nikola Mrksic;Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona

  • Multi-domain Dialog State Tracking using Recurrent Neural Networks

    Nikola Mrkšić;Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha;Blaise Thomson;Milica Gasic

  • TripPy: A Triple Copy Strategy for Value Independent Neural Dialog State Tracking

    Michael Heck;Carel van Niekerk;Nurul Lubis;Christian Geishauser

  • Gaussian Processes for POMDP-Based Dialogue Manager Optimization

    Milica Gasic;Steve Young

  • PyDial: A Multi-domain Statistical Dialogue System Toolkit

    Stefan Ultes;Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona;Pei-Hao Su;David Vandyke

  • Stochastic Language Generation in Dialogue using Recurrent Neural Networks with Convolutional Sentence Reranking

    Tsung-Hsien Wen;Milica Gasic;Dongho Kim;Nikola Mrksic

  • Phrase-Based Statistical Language Generation Using Graphical Models and Active Learning

    Francois Mairesse;Milica Gasic;Filip Jurcicek;Simon Keizer

  • Large-Scale Multi-Domain Belief Tracking with Knowledge Sharing

    Osman Ramadan;Paweł Budzianowski;Milica Gašić

  • A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue System

    Tsung-Hsien Wen;David Vandyke;Nikola Mrksic;Milica Gasic

  • On-line Active Reward Learning for Policy Optimisation in Spoken Dialogue Systems

    Pei-Hao Su;Milica Gasic;Nikola Mrksic;Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona

  • Continuously Learning Neural Dialogue Management.

    Pei-Hao Su;Milica Gasic;Nikola Mrksic;Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona

  • Sample-efficient Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Data for Dialogue Management

    Pei-Hao Su;Pawel Budzianowski;Stefan Ultes;Milica Gasic

  • Discriminative spoken language understanding using word confusion networks

    Matthew Henderson;Milica Gasic;Blaise Thomson;Pirros Tsiakoulis

  • Semantic Specialisation of Distributional Word Vector Spaces using Monolingual and Cross-Lingual Constraints

    Nikola Mrkšić;Ivan Vulić;Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha;Ira Leviant

  • POMDP-Based Statistical Spoken Dialog Systems: A Review This paper presents the theory and practice of belief tracking, policy optimization, parameter estimation, and fast learning.

    Steve Young;Milica Gasic;Blaise Thomson;Jason D. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Young
Steve Young University of Cambridge
Nikola Mrksic
Nikola Mrksic PolyAI Limited
Kai Yu
Kai Yu Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Peter Mika
Peter Mika Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Verena Rieser
Verena Rieser Heriot-Watt University
Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Roi Reichart
Roi Reichart Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Jason D. Williams
Jason D. Williams Apple (United States)
Anna Korhonen
Anna Korhonen University of Cambridge
Ivan Vulić
Ivan Vulić University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many academic and professional opportunities. Prospective students often consider the best degrees that align with their interests and career goals. Computer Science is consistently ranked as a top choice due to high demand and versatile applications.

For those seeking to advance their education quickly, some may look into the easiest master degree to get in related fields. These programs can offer accelerated learning without compromising essential skills, making them ideal for working professionals.

Doctoral programs are also becoming more accessible and affordable. Students often search for the most affordable doctoral programs to manage costs while earning a prestigious qualification.

If time is a critical factor, the fastest online edd programs offer a pathway to a doctoral degree with a condensed schedule. These options support ambitious learners in advancing their education and careers with greater speed and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Milica Gasic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles