World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
5908
World Ranking
8945
National Ranking
545

Verena Rieser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Verena Rieser sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Verena Rieser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Verena Rieser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Verena Rieser is a researcher affiliated with Heriot-Watt University in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions are primarily situated within computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and its related subfields.

Rieser's work encompasses several specialized areas, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Safety Research
  • Social Psychology
  • Information Systems

The main topics addressed in Rieser's research output include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Rieser has published extensively in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Rieser include:

  • ConvAbuse: Data, Analysis, and Benchmarks for Nuanced Detection in Conversational AI, 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational Systems, 2022, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Report from the NSF Future Directions Workshop on Automatic Evaluation of Dialog: Research Directions and Challenges, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Rieser on multiple occasions include:

  • Gavin Abercrombie
  • Tanvi Dinkar
  • Ioannis Konstas
  • Laura Weidinger
  • Canfer Akbulut

Best Publications

  • BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

    Unknown

  • Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG

    Jekaterina Novikova;Ondrej Dusek;Amanda Cercas Curry;Verena Rieser

  • The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generation

    Jekaterina Novikova;Ondřej Dušek;Verena Rieser

  • An Arabic Twitter Corpus for Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis

    Eshrag Refaee;Verena Rieser

  • Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for Building Conversational Agents

    Xingkun Liu;Arash Eshghi;Pawel Swietojanski;Verena Rieser

  • Evaluating the State-of-the-Art of End-to-End Natural Language Generation: The E2E NLG Challenge

    Ondřej Dušek;Ondřej Dušek;Jekaterina Novikova;Verena Rieser

  • Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Dialogue Systems

    Verena Rieser;Oliver Lemon

  • Natural Language Generation as Planning Under Uncertainty for Spoken Dialogue Systems

    Verena Rieser;Oliver Lemon

  • SLURP: A Spoken Language Understanding Resource Package

    Emanuele Bastianelli;Andrea Vanzo;Pawel Swietojanski;Verena Rieser

  • Findings of the E2E NLG Challenge.

    Ondrej Dusek;Jekaterina Novikova;Verena Rieser

  • Twenty Years of Confusion in Human Evaluation : NLG Needs Evaluation Sheets and Standardised Definitions

    David M. Howcroft;Anya Belz;Miruna-Adriana Clinciu;Dimitra Gkatzia

  • Learning Effective Multimodal Dialogue Strategies from Wizard-of-Oz Data: Bootstrapping and Evaluation

    Verena Rieser;Oliver Lemon

  • RankME: Reliable Human Ratings for Natural Language Generation

    Jekaterina Novikova;Ondřej Dušek;Verena Rieser

  • Semantic Noise Matters for Neural Natural Language Generation

    Ondřej Dušek;David M. Howcroft;Verena Rieser

  • Agent-based modelling of land use dynamics and residential quality of life for future scenarios

    Dave Murray-Rust;Verena Rieser;Derek T. Robinson;Vesna Miličič

  • #MeToo Alexa: How Conversational Systems Respond to Sexual Harassment.

    Amanda Cercas Curry;Verena Rieser

  • Modelling the impacts of land system dynamics on human well-being: Using an agent-based approach to cope with data limitations in Koper, Slovenia

    Derek T. Robinson;David Murray-Rust;Verena Rieser;Vesna Milicic

  • Better Conversations by Modeling, Filtering, and Optimizing for Coherence and Diversity

    Xinnuo Xu;Ondřej Dušek;Ioannis Konstas;Verena Rieser

  • SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational Systems

    Unknown

  • Implications for Generating Clarification Requests in Task-Oriented Dialogues

    Verena Rieser;Johanna Moore

  • Crowd-sourcing NLG Data: Pictures Elicit Better Data

    Jekaterina Novikova;Oliver Lemon;Verena Rieser

  • History for Visual Dialog: Do we really need it?

    Shubham Agarwal;Trung Bui;Joon-Young Lee;Ioannis Konstas

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Alex Lascarides
Alex Lascarides University of Edinburgh
Nicholas Asher
Nicholas Asher Toulouse Institute of Computer Science Research
Steve Young
Steve Young University of Cambridge
David Corne
David Corne Heriot-Watt University
Milica Gasic
Milica Gasic Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Peter Mika
Peter Mika Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Mark Rounsevell
Mark Rounsevell University of Edinburgh
Joon-Young Lee
Joon-Young Lee Adobe Systems (United States)
Matthew R. Walter
Matthew R. Walter Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it's useful to consider related online degrees and certifications that can boost your career options. For students interested in technical fields, many of the top online electrical engineering schools offer programs that complement a background in computer science, opening doors in areas like robotics, circuit design, and hardware systems.

If you're looking for efficient ways to enhance your skills quickly, consider pursuing easy licenses and certifications to get. These certifications often take less time than a degree and can lead to well-paying technical roles, especially in IT and networking.

Those aiming for advanced positions may benefit from exploring the fastest online master's degree programs. These degrees allow you to upskill in a shorter timeframe, which is ideal if you want to quickly pivot into higher-level or specialized roles.

Finally, if you're wondering, "what masters program should I do?", looking into the most valuable and in-demand programs can further clarify your career pathway. By combining computer science with these related fields, you’ll expand your knowledge base and job prospects in today's tech-driven market.

Best Scientists Citing Verena Rieser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles