World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
26740
World Ranking
1837
National Ranking
935

Jeffrey C. Mogul publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Mogul sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 189 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeffrey C. Mogul D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Mogul sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - ACM Fellow For significant contributions in operating systems, file systems, Web caching, Internet performance, and Internet standards.

Overview

Jeffrey C. Mogul is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Computer Science, particularly in areas such as Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work encompasses several specific research topics, including:

  • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Software System Performance and Reliability

In terms of publication venues, the scientist has frequently contributed to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review

Recent papers authored or co-authored by the scientist include:

  • Gemini: Practical Reconfigurable Datacenter Networks with Topology and Traffic Engineering, 2021, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Data-driven networking research, 2021, published in ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • Do Data Center Network Metrics Predict Application-Facing Performance?, 2024, published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeffrey C. Mogul include:

  • Amin Vahdat
  • Priya Mahadevan
  • Christophe Diot
  • John Wilkes
  • Phillipa Gill

The scientist was recognized as an ACM Fellow in 2001. The award citation mentions contributions to operating systems, file systems, Web caching, Internet performance, and Internet standards.

Best Publications

  • Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1

    R. Fielding;J. Gettys;J. Mogul;H. Frystyk

  • DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks

    Andrew R. Curtis;Jeffrey C. Mogul;Jean Tourrilhes;Praveen Yalagandula

  • Resource containers: a new facility for resource management in server systems

    Gaurav Banga;Peter Druschel;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Using predictive prefetching to improve World Wide Web latency

    Venkata N. Padmanabhan;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Path MTU discovery

    J. C. Mogul;S. E. Deering

  • Performance debugging for distributed systems of black boxes

    Marcos K. Aguilera;Jeffrey C. Mogul;Janet L. Wiener;Patrick Reynolds

  • Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel

    Jeffrey C. Mogul;K. K. Ramakrishnan

  • Exploring the bounds of web latency reduction from caching and prefetching

    Thomas M. Kroeger;Darrell D. E. Long;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Rate of change and other metrics: a live study of the world wide web

    Fred Douglis;Anja Feldmann;Balachander Krishnamurthy;Jeffrey Mogul

  • Potential benefits of delta encoding and data compression for HTTP

    Jeffrey C. Mogul;Fred Douglis;Anja Feldmann;Balachander Krishnamurthy

  • The packer filter: an efficient mechanism for user-level network code

    J. Mogul;R. Rashid;M. Accetta

  • The case for persistent-connection HTTP

    Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Pip: detecting the unexpected in distributed systems

    Patrick Reynolds;Charles Killian;Janet L. Wiener;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Improving HTTP latency

    Venkata N. Padmanabhan;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Method for dynamically adjusting multimedia content of a web page by a server in accordance to network path characteristics between client and server

    Jeffrey C. Mogul;Lawrence S. Brakmo

  • Auditing to keep online storage services honest

    Mehul A. Shah;Mary Baker;Jeffrey C. Mogul;Ram Swaminathan

  • Measured capacity of an Ethernet: myths and reality

    D. R. Boggs;J. C. Mogul;C. A. Kent

  • Fragmentation considered harmful

    Christopher A. Kent;Jeffrey C. Mogul

  • Enforcing network-wide policies in the presence of dynamic middlebox actions using flowtags

    Seyed Kaveh Fayazbakhsh;Luis Chiang;Vyas Sekar;Minlan Yu

  • Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6

    J. McCann;S. Deering;J. Mogul

  • Potential Benefits Of Delta Encoding and Data Compression for HTTP (Corrected Version)

    Jeffrey Mogul;Fred Douglis;Anja Feldmann;Balachander Krishnamurthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Balachander Krishnamurthy
Balachander Krishnamurthy AT&T (United States)
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Naveen Muralimanohar
Naveen Muralimanohar Google (United States)
Puneet Sharma
Puneet Sharma Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Anja Feldmann
Anja Feldmann Max Planck Society
Fred Douglis
Fred Douglis Peraton Labs
Mary Baker
Mary Baker Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Peter Druschel
Peter Druschel Max Planck Institute for Software Systems

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree and career options. Many students are looking for flexible, affordable ways to enhance their credentials or switch fields. Choosing the least expensive online masters programs can help minimize student debt while advancing your technical expertise or management skills.

If you’re considering leadership roles in IT organizations or academia, pursuing a doctorate in organizational leadership online may also be worth exploring. These programs can prepare you for high-level positions without requiring you to leave your current job.

For those just starting their academic journey, the easiest associate degree to get online could be a practical stepping stone, offering foundational knowledge and direct-to-workforce opportunities in tech-related fields.

Additionally, for educators in technology-focused education, the cheapest online edd programs no gre provide a pathway to leadership and instructional design roles in schools or universities, often with added convenience and cost savings.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey C. Mogul

Trending Scientists