World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
9208
World Ranking
4901
National Ranking
2276

Frederic T. Chong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic T. Chong sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 212 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frederic T. Chong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic T. Chong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Frederic T. Chong is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their work includes significant contributions to subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their primary research topics focus on Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Quantum Information and Cryptography, Quantum and electron transport phenomena, Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing, and Cloud Computing and Resource Management.

Recent papers authored by Frederic T. Chong include the following:

  • O(N³) Measurement Cost for Variational Quantum Eigensolver on Molecular Hamiltonians, 2020, published in DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Quantum-centric supercomputing for materials science: A perspective on challenges and future directions, 2024, published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • QuantumNAT, 2022, published in Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
  • Optimized SWAP networks with equivalent circuit averaging for QAOA, 2022, published in Physical Review Research
  • Quantum Computing for Enhancing Grid Security, 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Frederic T. Chong has frequently collaborated with researchers such as Pranav Gokhale, Jonathan M. Baker, Yongshan Ding, Kaitlin N. Smith, and Gokul Subramanian Ravi.

Their work has been published extensively in venues including arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Micro, npj Quantum Information, the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), and Quantum.

In addition to journal and conference publications, Frederic T. Chong has contributed to book literature, with a publication titled Quantum Computer Systems released by Morgan & Claypool Publishers in 2020.

Among the recognitions received in their career is the ACM Distinguished Member award granted in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Minos: Control Data Attack Prevention Orthogonal to Memory Model

    Jedidiah R. Crandall;Frederic T. Chong

  • Quantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery

    Yuri Alexeev;Dave Bacon;Kenneth R. Brown;Robert Calderbank

  • Active pages: a computation model for intelligent memory

    Mark Oskin;Frederic T. Chong;Timothy Sherwood

  • Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers

    Prakash Murali;Jonathan M. Baker;Ali Javadi-Abhari;Frederic T. Chong

  • Complete information flow tracking from the gates up

    Mohit Tiwari;Hassan M.G. Wassel;Bita Mazloom;Shashidhar Mysore

  • On deriving unknown vulnerabilities from zero-day polymorphic and metamorphic worm exploits

    Jedidiah R. Crandall;Zhendong Su;S. Felix Wu;Frederic T. Chong

  • Programming languages and compiler design for realistic quantum hardware

    Frederic T. Chong;Diana Franklin;Margaret Martonosi

  • HLS: combining statistical and symbolic simulation to guide microprocessor designs

    Mark Oskin;Frederic T. Chong;Matthew Farrens

  • A practical architecture for reliable quantum computers

    M. Oskin;F.T. Chong;I.L. Chuang

  • ScaffCC: a framework for compilation and analysis of quantum computing programs

    Ali JavadiAbhari;Shruti Patil;Daniel Kudrow;Jeff Heckey

  • Construction of hierarchical networks through extension

    Eric A. Brewer;Frederic T. Chong

  • ScaffCC: Scalable compilation and analysis of quantum programs

    Ali Javadiabhari;Shruti Patil;Daniel Kudrow;Jeff Heckey

  • Sapper: a language for hardware-level security policy enforcement

    Xun Li;Vineeth Kashyap;Jason K. Oberg;Mohit Tiwari

  • SurfNoC: a low latency and provably non-interfering approach to secure networks-on-chip

    Hassan M. G. Wassel;Ying Gao;Jason K. Oberg;Ted Huffmire

  • Crafting a usable microkernel, processor, and I/O system with strict and provable information flow security

    Mohit Tiwari;Jason K. Oberg;Xun Li;Jonathan Valamehr

  • Use cases of lossy compression for floating-point data in scientific data sets:

    Franck Cappello;Franck Cappello;Sheng Di;Sihuan Li;Xin Liang

  • Caisson: a hardware description language for secure information flow

    Xun Li;Mohit Tiwari;Jason K. Oberg;Vineeth Kashyap

  • Asymptotic improvements to quantum circuits via qutrits

    Pranav Gokhale;Jonathan M. Baker;Casey Duckering;Natalie C. Brown

  • Minimizing State Preparations in Variational Quantum Eigensolver by Partitioning into Commuting Families

    Pranav Gokhale;Olivia Angiuli;Yongshan Ding;Kaiwen Gui

  • Full-state quantum circuit simulation by using data compression

    Xin-Chuan Wu;Sheng Di;Emma Maitreyee Dasgupta;Franck Cappello

  • Optimized Compilation of Aggregated Instructions for Realistic Quantum Computers

    Yunong Shi;Nelson Leung;Pranav Gokhale;Zane Rossi

  • Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers

    Prakash Murali;Jonathan M. Baker;Ali Javadi Abhari;Frederic T. Chong

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy Sherwood
Timothy Sherwood University of California, Santa Barbara
Margaret Martonosi
Margaret Martonosi Princeton University
John Kubiatowicz
John Kubiatowicz University of California, Berkeley
Franck Cappello
Franck Cappello Argonne National Laboratory
Ricardo Bianchini
Ricardo Bianchini Microsoft (United States)
Ryan Kastner
Ryan Kastner University of California, San Diego
Henry Hoffmann
Henry Hoffmann University of Chicago
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies in the USA opens up various online degree options tailored to different career goals and educational backgrounds. For those looking to strengthen their career prospects, choosing the best masters degree to get can provide access to in-demand tech roles and increased earning potential.

If you are just starting your academic journey or seeking a flexible, fast-track path, online associates degrees offer foundational knowledge and relevant skills, often with transfer pathways to bachelor’s programs.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. There are numerous options for the cheapest online degrees, allowing you to save on tuition while still receiving a quality education.

For individuals concerned about their academic record, consider institutions recognized as the best colleges for low gpa. These schools offer supportive online environments and accessible admissions policies to help you advance your computer science career.

Best Scientists Citing Frederic T. Chong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles