World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
11632
World Ranking
8628
National Ranking
3698

Heng Yin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heng Yin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 102 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Heng Yin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heng Yin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heng Yin is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields but is principally focused on Medicine and Computer Science. The scope of their research integrates topics from software engineering to medical studies related to reproduction and immune system diseases.

The primary fields of study for Heng Yin include:

  • Medicine
  • Computer Science

Within these broader domains, their subfields of study are diverse, covering:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Software
  • Information Systems

Heng Yin's research topics reflect a strong intersection of medical and software engineering concerns. The main topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

Several recent papers by Heng Yin illustrate the range of their work. Notable publications include:

  • "ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model" (2023), published in International Journal of Oral Science
  • "Clinical analysis of ten pregnant women with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study" (2020), published in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • "A deep learning, image based approach for automated diagnosis for inflammatory skin diseases" (2020), published in Annals of Translational Medicine
  • "Impact of Wuhan lockdown on the indications of cesarean delivery and newborn weights during the epidemic period of COVID-19" (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Codee: A Tensor Embedding Scheme for Binary Code Search" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

The frequent co-authors with whom Heng Yin has collaborated include Haijing Wu, Yun Zhao, Hai Long, Xin Huang, and Ruobing Li.

Heng Yin's publications are often hosted in venues that emphasize open science and electronic dissemination. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • PubMed
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Panorama: capturing system-wide information flow for malware detection and analysis

    Heng Yin;Dawn Song;Manuel Egele;Christopher Kruegel

  • BitBlaze: A New Approach to Computer Security via Binary Analysis

    Dawn Song;David Brumley;Heng Yin;Juan Caballero

  • DroidScope: seamlessly reconstructing the OS and Dalvik semantic views for dynamic Android malware analysis

    Lok Kwong Yan;Heng Yin

  • DroidAPIMiner: Mining API-Level Features for Robust Malware Detection in Android

    Yousra Aafer;Wenliang Du;Heng Yin

  • Neural Network-based Graph Embedding for Cross-Platform Binary Code Similarity Detection

    Xiaojun Xu;Chang Liu;Qian Feng;Heng Yin

  • Polyglot: automatic extraction of protocol message format using dynamic binary analysis

    Juan Caballero;Heng Yin;Zhenkai Liang;Dawn Song

  • Semantics-Aware Android Malware Classification Using Weighted Contextual API Dependency Graphs

    Mu Zhang;Yue Duan;Heng Yin;Zhiruo Zhao

  • Renovo: a hidden code extractor for packed executables

    Min Gyung Kang;Pongsin Poosankam;Heng Yin

  • Scalable Graph-based Bug Search for Firmware Images

    Qian Feng;Rundong Zhou;Chengcheng Xu;Yao Cheng

  • Dynamic spyware analysis

    Manuel Egele;Christopher Kruegel;Engin Kirda;Heng Yin

  • Automatically Identifying Trigger-based Behavior in Malware

    David Brumley;Cody Hartwig;Zhenkai Liang;James Newsome

  • Attacks on WebView in the Android system

    Tongbo Luo;Hao Hao;Wenliang Du;Yifei Wang

  • Code Injection Attacks on HTML5-based Mobile Apps: Characterization, Detection and Mitigation

    Xing Jin;Xuchao Hu;Kailiang Ying;Wenliang Du

  • HookFinder: Identifying and Understanding Malware Hooking Behaviors

    Heng Yin;Zhenkai Liang;Dawn Song

  • AppSealer: Automatic Generation of Vulnerability-Specific Patches for Preventing Component Hijacking Attacks in Android Applications

    Mu Zhang;Heng Yin

  • Emulating emulation-resistant malware

    Min Gyung Kang;Heng Yin;Steve Hanna;Stephen McCamant

  • FIRM-AFL: High-Throughput Greybox Fuzzing of IoT Firmware via Augmented Process Emulation

    Yaowen Zheng;Ali Davanian;Heng Yin;Chengyu Song

  • DEEPBINDIFF: Learning Program-Wide Code Representations for Binary Diffing

    Yue Duan;Xuezixiang Li;Jinghan Wang;Heng Yin

  • vfGuard: Strict Protection for Virtual Function Calls in COTS C++ Binaries

    Aravind Prakash;Xunchao Hu;Heng Yin

  • Make it work, make it right, make it fast: building a platform-neutral whole-system dynamic binary analysis platform

    Andrew Henderson;Aravind Prakash;Lok Kwong Yan;Xunchao Hu

  • Send Hardest Problems My Way: Probabilistic Path Prioritization for Hybrid Fuzzing.

    Lei Zhao;Yue Duan;Heng Yin;Jifeng Xuan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
Zhenkai Liang
Zhenkai Liang National University of Singapore
Haining Wang
Haining Wang Virginia Tech
Zhiqiang Lin
Zhiqiang Lin The Ohio State University
Wenliang Du
Wenliang Du Syracuse University
David Brumley
David Brumley Carnegie Mellon University
Engin Kirda
Engin Kirda Northeastern University
Christopher Kruegel
Christopher Kruegel University of California, Santa Barbara
Le Song
Le Song Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Jianping Pan
Jianping Pan University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech-driven roles grows, more students are turning to flexible learning options. An accelerated computer science degree online can help you complete your studies faster and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated learners or working professionals aiming to quickly upskill.

If you’re interested in interdisciplinary paths, there are affordable options in related fields. For example, an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online provides the tech and engineering know-how to tackle environmental challenges—a sector seeing steady global growth.

Costs are a major consideration for many students. Researching the mechanical engineering degree cost and comparing tuition can help you find the best value. Many schools also offer accessible payment plans and financial aid options.

If you’re looking for a science-focused pathway, consider the cheapest online physics degree programs. These options can lead to exciting careers in research, education, or technology.

Exploring related online degrees not only broadens your skill set but also enhances your career possibilities in today’s competitive, tech-centric job market.

Best Scientists Citing Heng Yin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles