World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
13574
World Ranking
2131
National Ranking
379

Julie Barnett publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Barnett sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 302 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julie Barnett D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Barnett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie Barnett is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research spans diverse areas primarily within medicine and social sciences, contributing extensively to both fields. The subfields in which they have published include sociology and political science, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

Their main research topics reflect a broad engagement with societal and environmental challenges, with key focuses including climate change communication and perception, environmental education and sustainability, health policy implementation science, pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, COVID-19 and mental health, music and audio processing, and agriculture sustainability and environmental impact.

Julie Barnett has published numerous papers, with recent representative works covering various subjects and publication venues:

  • Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018-2020), 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Youth perceptions of climate change: A narrative synthesis, 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
  • Exploring the influences on men's engagement with weight loss services: a qualitative study, 2020, BMC Public Health
  • Going veggie: Identifying and overcoming the social and psychological barriers to veganism, 2021, Appetite
  • Integrating local and scientific knowledge in disaster risk reduction: A systematic review of motivations, processes, and outcomes, 2022, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Their work is featured in several frequent publication venues, demonstrating a range of disciplinary reach. These venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
  • BMC Public Health
  • British Journal of Health Psychology

In collaborative research efforts, Julie Barnett has worked extensively with several co-authors, some of whom have appeared in multiple publications together. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Leda Blackwood
  • Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
  • Danaë Stanton Fraser
  • Ruth Barden
  • Katharine Lee

Best Publications

  • Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period

    Konstantina Vasileiou;Julie Barnett;Susan Thorpe;Terry Young

  • Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review

    Christopher Bryant;Julie Barnett

  • 'Would you eat cultured meat?': consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom

    Wim Verbeke;Afrodita Marcu;Pieter Rutsaert;Rui Gaspar

  • Adolescents’ views of food and eating: identifying barriers to healthy eating

    Clifford Stevenson;Glenda Doherty;Julie Barnett;Orla T. Muldoon

  • Risk perception and experience: hazard personality profiles and individual differences.

    Jullie Barnett;Glynis M. Breakwell

  • Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018–2020)

    Christopher Bryant;Julie Barnett

  • Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public

    Panos Panagiotopoulos;Julie Barnett;Alinaghi Ziaee Bigdeli;Steven Sams

  • What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names.

    Christopher J. Bryant;Julie C. Barnett

  • Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study

    Julie Barnett;Konstantina Vasileiou;Fayika Djemil;Laurence Brooks

  • The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives

    Arthur G Money;Julie Barnett;Jasna Kuljis;Michael P Craven

  • Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK

    Julie Barnett;Kate Burningham;Gordon Walker;Noel Cass

  • Experiences of Loneliness Associated with Being an Informal Caregiver: A Qualitative Investigation

    Konstantina Vasileiou;Julie Barnett;Manuela Barreto;Manuela Barreto;John Vines

  • Youth perceptions of climate change: a narrative synthesis

    Katharine Lee;Nathalia Gjersoe;Saffron O'Neill;Julie Barnett

  • Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: Imagined subjectivities of 'the public' and their implications

    Gordon Walker;Noel Cass;Kate Burningham;Julie Barnett

  • Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: a consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling.

    Charo Hodgkins;Julie Barnett;Grazyna Wasowicz-Kirylo;Malgorzata Stysko-Kunkowska

  • Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat:

    Afrodita Marcu;Rui Gaspar;Pieter Rutsaert;Beate Seibt

  • The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: a literature review

    Kate Burningham;Julie Barnett;Diana Thrush

  • Seeking information about food-related risks: The contribution of social media.

    Marg Ôt Kuttschreuter;Pieter Rutsaert;Femke Hilverda;Áine Regan

  • An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents

    Kate Burningham;Julie Barnett;Gordon Walker

  • Consumers' confidence, reflections and response strategies following the horsemeat incident

    J Barnett;F Begen;S Howes;A Regan

  • A review of consumer awareness, understanding and use of food-based dietary guidelines.

    Kerry A. Brown;Lada Timotijevic;Julie Barnett;Richard Shepherd

Frequent Co-Authors

Monique Raats
Monique Raats University of Surrey
Richard Shepherd
Richard Shepherd University of Surrey
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
Wim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke Ghent University
David Uzzell
David Uzzell University of Surrey
Glynis M. Breakwell
Glynis M. Breakwell University of Bath
Clive Potter
Clive Potter Imperial College London
Beate Seibt
Beate Seibt University of Oslo
Manuela Barreto
Manuela Barreto University of Exeter
Gordon Walker
Gordon Walker Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse careers in counseling, social work, psychology, and behavioral analysis. Many students seek flexible, affordable paths—making online programs increasingly popular. When choosing a program, accreditation, cost, and duration are major considerations.

For those interested in social work, you can find options such as the cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs or even enroll in 1 year msw programs online to fast-track your career. Aspiring psychologists can also benefit from fast psychology degree options, which help you enter the workforce sooner.

Careers in behavioral analysis are growing, and affordability matters. Programs like the cheapest bcba online program offer accessible entry points into this rewarding field.

Before enrolling, be sure to review each program's requirements and outcomes to ensure it meets your professional goals and licensure needs.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Barnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles