World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
13554
World Ranking
3009
National Ranking
321

Jane Ogden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Ogden sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane Ogden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Ogden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Ogden is affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their research spans a range of subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics of Jane Ogden's work focus on areas such as Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obesity and Health Practices, Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Media Influence and Health, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Cogent Psychology, Journal of Health Psychology, Appetite, Psychology Health & Medicine, and Health Education.

Recent papers by Jane Ogden and associates include the following:

  • The implications of defining obesity as a disease: a report from the Association for the Study of Obesity 2021 annual conference (2023, EClinicalMedicine)
  • Challenges, strategies and self-efficacy of teachers supporting autistic pupils in contrasting school settings: a qualitative study (2021, European Journal of Special Needs Education)
  • Exposure to body diversity images as a buffer against the thin-ideal: An experimental study (2020, Psychology Health & Medicine)
  • Evaluating the impact of a time orientation intervention on well-being during the COVID-19 lockdown: past, present or future? (2020, The Journal of Positive Psychology)
  • Nostalgia, Gratitude, or Optimism: The Impact of a Two-Week Intervention on Well-Being During COVID-19 (2022, Journal of Happiness Studies)

Jane Ogden frequently collaborates with other researchers including:

  • Sarah-Jane Stewart
  • Amelia Dennis
  • Katy L. Penfold
  • Helen M. Higgins
  • Sam Cockle

Best Publications

  • Children’s eating attitudes and behaviour: a study of the modelling and control theories of parental influence

    Rachael Brown;Jane Ogden

  • Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis.

    Jane Ogden

  • Health Psychology: A Textbook

    Jane Ogden

  • The Psychology of Eating: From Healthy to Disordered Behavior

    Jane Ogden

  • Expanding the concept of parental control: a role for overt and covert control in children's snacking behaviour?

    Jane Ogden;Rebecca Reynolds;Andrea Smith

  • The role of parental control practices in explaining children's diet and BMI.

    Kerry A. Brown;Jane Ogden;Claus Vögele;E. Leigh Gibson

  • The Development and Validation of the Exercise Dependence Questionnaire

    Jane Ogden;David Veale;Zelda Summers

  • A qualitative study of GPs' views of treating obesity

    Laura Epstein;Jane Ogden

  • The Effect of the Media on Body Satisfaction: the Role of Gender and Size

    Jane Ogden;Kate Mundray

  • “I want more time with my doctor”: a quantitative study of time and the consultation

    Jane Ogden;Kheelna Bavalia;Matthew Bull;Stuart Frankum

  • Eating style and eating behaviour in adolescents.

    Jane Wardle;Louise Marsland;Yasmin Sheikh;Marie Quinn

  • The impact of obesity surgery and the paradox of control: A qualitative study

    Jane Ogden;Cecilia Clementi;Simon Aylwin

  • Practice nurses’ beliefs about obesity and weight related interventions in primary care

    R Hoppe;JE Ogden

  • General practitioners' experiences of patients' complaints: qualitative study.

    Ashok Jain;Jane Ogden

  • Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless eating.

    Jane Ogden;Nicola Coop;Charlotte Cousins;Rebecca Crump

  • General practitioners' and patients' models of obesity: whose problem is it?

    Jane Ogden;Induja Bandara;Howard Cohen;David Farmer

  • Psychosocial theory and the creation of the risky self

    Jane Ogden

  • The role of the mother-daughter relationship in explaining weight concern.

    Jane Ogden;Jo Steward

  • Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: the example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel.

    Jane Ogden

  • Beliefs about the causes and solutions to obesity: a comparison of GPs and lay people.

    Jane Ogden;Zakk Flanagan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Wardle
Jane Wardle University College London
Angela Harden
Angela Harden City, University of London
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath
Monique Raats
Monique Raats University of Surrey
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Claus Vögele
Claus Vögele University of Luxembourg
Richard Shepherd
Richard Shepherd University of Surrey
Elizabeth A. Grunfeld
Elizabeth A. Grunfeld Birkbeck, University of London
Trudie Chalder
Trudie Chalder King's College London
Michelle A. Williams
Michelle A. Williams Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Psychology, there are many related online degrees that lead to rewarding career pathways—especially in social work. Educational requirements for social workers can vary dramatically from state to state, so it’s essential to understand your local regulations before committing to a program.

For example, students considering becoming a social worker in Alaska should review the social worker degree requirements in Alaska to determine the necessary qualifications. Similarly, prospective professionals in Arizona can explore Arizona education requirements for social workers to ensure they meet all state guidelines.

Arkansas also has its own criteria, and understanding the social worker degree requirements in Arkansas helps future applicants plan their coursework effectively. Meanwhile, those interested in practicing social work in California should familiarize themselves with the social worker degree requirements in California.

By researching these pathways and state-specific education qualifications, students can make informed decisions and find the right online degree to launch their psychology-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Ogden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles