World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 174 54 4 910 110775
Best Scientists 174 746 80 910 110775
Medicine 177 405 48 889 116904

Jane Wardle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Wardle between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Wardle published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 102 publications in 2015. 1 of the 921 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 102. Peak 102 publications in 2015. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 26 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 45 publications 2008: 53 publications 2009: 56 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 53 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 58 publications 2015: 102 publications 2016: 70 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

921 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Wardle: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 2
1980 4
1981 4
1982 3
1983 2
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 6
1988 5
1989 5
1990 8
1991 4
1992 8
1993 5
1994 17
1995 12
1996 9
1997 10
1998 11
1999 7
2000 18
2001 19
2002 26
2003 25
2004 30
2005 25
2006 31
2007 45
2008 53
2009 56
2010 39
2011 53
2012 45
2013 45
2014 58
2015 102
2016 70
2017 34
2018 3
2019 0
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 8
2024 0
2025 1
Total 921
Download as CSV

Jane Wardle publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Wardle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 889 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 889
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Wardle D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Wardle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 176–177 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 177 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28 177
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Jane Wardle was affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spanned several areas within medicine and related disciplines.

Their fields of study included:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these main fields, their subfields of research covered:

  • Genetics
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Wardle's research topics included:

  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The scientist published studies in a variety of journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • International Journal of Obesity
  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Predicting Nasal High-Flow Treatment Success in Newborn Infants with Respiratory Distress Cared for in Nontertiary Hospitals" (2020), published in The Journal of Pediatrics
  • "Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term secondary lifestyle behavioural outcomes" (2022), published in BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • "Jewish cultural and religious factors and uptake of population-based BRCA testing across denominations: a cohort study" (2021), published in BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • "Do lower antenatal blood pressure cut-offs in pregnant women with obesity identify those at greater risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes? A secondary analysis of data from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT)" (2025), published in International Journal of Obesity
  • "Correction to: A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial" (2021), published in International Journal of Obesity

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wardle were:

  • Matthew Burnell
  • Saskia C. Sanderson
  • K Loggenberg
  • Sue Gessler
  • Lucy Side

Best Publications

  • Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food: the Food Choice Questionnaire

    Andrew Steptoe;Tessa M. Pollard;Jane Wardle

  • Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women

    Andrew Steptoe;Aparna Shankar;Panayotes Demakakos;Jane Wardle

  • How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world

    Phillippa Lally;Cornelia H. M. van Jaarsveld;Henry W. W. Potts;Jane Wardle

  • Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Wendy S. Atkin;Rob Edwards;Ines Kralj-Hans;Kate Wooldrage

  • Development of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

    Jane Wardle;Carol Ann Guthrie;Saskia Sanderson;Lorna Rapoport

  • Gender Differences in Food Choice: The Contribution of Health Beliefs and Dieting

    Jane Wardle;Anne M. Haase;Andrew Steptoe;Maream Nillapun

  • Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?

    Yoichi Chida;Mark Hamer;Jane Wardle;Andrew Steptoe

  • Nutrition knowledge and food intake

    J. Wardle;K. Parmenter;J. Waller

  • Stress and food choice: A laboratory study

    Georgina Oliver;Jane Wardle;E. Gibson

  • Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990-2005.

    Vanessa Shrewsbury;Jane Wardle

  • Positive affect and health-related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes

    Andrew Steptoe;Jane Wardle;Michael Marmot

  • Smart food policies for obesity prevention

    Corinna Hawkes;Trenton G Smith;Jo Jewell;Jane Wardle

  • Evidence for a strong genetic influence on childhood adiposity despite the force of the obesogenic environment

    Jane Wardle;Susan Carnell;Claire M. A. Haworth;Robert Plomin

  • Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Nutritional Knowledge and Beliefs in Mothers and Children

    E. L. Gibson;Jane Wardle;Carolyn J. Watts

  • Dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, and psychological distress: a prospective analysis.

    Fiona Johnson;Jane Wardle

  • Perceived Effects of Stress on Food Choice

    Georgina Oliver;Jane Wardle

  • Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles

    Jane Wardle;Andrew Steptoe

  • Demographic, familial and trait predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption by pre-school children.

    L J Cooke;J Wardle;EL Gibson;M Sapochnik

  • Modifying children's food preferences: the effects of exposure and reward on acceptance of an unfamiliar vegetable

    J. Wardle;M.-L. Herrera;L. Cooke;E.L. Gibson

  • Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults

    K Parmenter;J Wardle

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Steptoe
Andrew Steptoe University College London
Jo Waller
Jo Waller King's College London
Susan Carnell
Susan Carnell Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Laura A.V. Marlow
Laura A.V. Marlow King's College London
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Kirsten McCaffery
Kirsten McCaffery University of Sydney
Steve Halligan
Steve Halligan University College London
Martin J. Jarvis
Martin J. Jarvis University College London
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Claire M. A. Haworth
Claire M. A. Haworth University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine, there are several online degree options and career pathways that can help you advance your education and professional goals. For those looking to step into healthcare leadership, choosing accredited mha programs ensures you receive quality training recognized by top employers.

Registered nurses who wish to earn a bachelor’s degree can now find rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, making career advancement more flexible for busy professionals. For those aspiring to the highest levels of nursing practice, the fastest msn to dnp program options can help you complete your doctorate in less time.

If research isn’t your primary focus, many online dnp programs without dissertation allow students to focus on clinical practice and leadership without the requirement of a lengthy research project. Overall, these flexible online programs make it easier for working professionals to advance their education and open doors to new opportunities in the U.S. healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Wardle

Recently Published Articles