Surgery, Clinical trial, MEDLINE, Randomized controlled trial and Patient safety are his primary areas of study. His studies in Surgery integrate themes in fields like Meta-analysis and Pregnancy. His Clinical trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Intensive care medicine, Alternative medicine, Psychotherapist, Medical education and Nicotine replacement therapy.
His MEDLINE research incorporates themes from Informed consent, Nursing, Intervention, Research design and Risk assessment. His work in Intervention addresses issues such as Patient recruitment, which are connected to fields such as Sample size determination and Psychological intervention. His Randomized controlled trial research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Relative risk, Colorectal cancer, Quality of life and Barium enema.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in MEDLINE, Pregnancy, Psychological intervention, Randomized controlled trial and Surgery. The various areas that Richard J. Lilford examines in his MEDLINE study include Research design and Family medicine. His Pregnancy research focuses on subjects like Obstetrics, which are linked to Gynecology and Fetus.
His work carried out in the field of Psychological intervention brings together such families of science as Intervention and Health care. His study connects Nursing and Health care. In his research on the topic of Randomized controlled trial, Alternative medicine is strongly related with Clinical trial.
His primary areas of investigation include Psychological intervention, Health care, MEDLINE, Family medicine and Systematic review. His Psychological intervention research includes themes of Intervention, Health services research, Randomized controlled trial and Service delivery framework, Service. His study in Randomized controlled trial is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Barium enema, Alternative medicine and Radiology.
His research investigates the connection between Health care and topics such as Public health that intersect with problems in Environmental health and Qualitative research. His studies deal with areas such as Meta-analysis, Research design and Emergency medicine as well as MEDLINE. The concepts of his Systematic review study are interwoven with issues in Procurement, Publication bias and Applied psychology.
Richard J. Lilford mostly deals with MEDLINE, Psychological intervention, Health care, Randomized controlled trial and Environmental health. His MEDLINE research includes elements of Data mining, Program evaluation, Emergency medicine, Meta-analysis and Audit. Richard J. Lilford has included themes like Empirical evidence, Service, Intervention, Young adult and Disease in his Psychological intervention study.
His work on Stepped wedge is typically connected to Context as part of general Intervention study, connecting several disciplines of science. The study incorporates disciplines such as Systematic review, Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Barium enema and Radiology in addition to Randomized controlled trial. In Family medicine, Richard J. Lilford works on issues like Patient safety, which are connected to Nursing.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review
Celia A Brown;Richard J Lilford.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2006)
The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.
Ray Garry;Jayne Fountain;Su Mason;Jeremy Hawe.
BMJ (2004)
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
Karla Hemming;Terrence Peter Haines;Peter J Chilton;Alan John Girling.
BMJ (2015)
Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma
Richard Lilford;Mohammed A Mohammed;David Spiegelhalter;Richard Thomson.
The Lancet (2004)
Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect".
David A. Braunholtz;Sarah J.L. Edwards;Richard J. Lilford.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2001)
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials
Sarah J L Edwards;David A Braunholtz;Richard J Lilford;Andrew J Stevens.
BMJ (1999)
The systemic immune response to trauma: an overview of pathophysiology and treatment.
Janet M Lord;Mark J Midwinter;Yen-Fu Chen;Yen-Fu Chen;Antonio Belli.
The Lancet (2014)
The Top Patient Safety Strategies That Can Be Encouraged for Adoption Now
Paul G. Shekelle;Peter J. Pronovost;Robert M. Wachter;Kathryn M. McDonald.
Annals of Internal Medicine (2013)
A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine
Joanne M Hemmerdinger;Samuel D R Stoddart;Richard J Lilford.
BMC Medical Education (2007)
Effects of redesigned community postnatal care on womens' health 4 months after birth: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Christine MacArthur;Heather Winter;Debra Bick;H Knowles.
The Lancet (2002)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University College London
University College London
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Warwick
University of Cambridge
University of Granada
University of Birmingham
University of Warwick
Newcastle University
Animal and Plant Health Agency
French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Tel Aviv University
Linköping University
Warsaw University of Technology
La Trobe University
Ghent University
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Coastal Carolina University
Louisiana State University
University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
University of Manitoba
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Leiden University
Heidelberg University