World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederic I. Preffer

Frederic I. Preffer

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
16136
World Ranking
12360
National Ranking
5289

Frederic I. Preffer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic I. Preffer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 197 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Frederic I. Preffer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic I. Preffer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederic I. Preffer is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly in hematology and oncology.

Their research spans several significant subfields including hematology, oncology, molecular biology, electrical and electronic engineering, and biomedical engineering. The main topics of their work cover:

  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

Frederic I. Preffer has published in leading scientific journals with frequent appearances in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry, and also in Blood and Leukemia & Lymphoma/Leukemia and Lymphoma. Their contributions to Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry number twelve publications, while they have authored two papers in Blood, and one in Leukemia & Lymphoma.

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Safety and efficacy of tisagenlecleucel in primary CNS lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial," 2022, Blood
  • "New directions in chimeric antigen receptor T cell [CAR-T] therapy and related flow cytometry," 2020, Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry
  • "Phase 1 Study of CD37-Directed CAR T Cells in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD37+ Hematologic Malignancies," 2021, Blood
  • "Optimization of a flow cytometry test for routine monitoring of B cell maturation antigen targeted CAR in peripheral blood," 2024, Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry
  • "Issue Highlights - November 2020," 2020, Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry

Frederic I. Preffer frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Frederic Boston
  • Marie C. Béné
  • Shahram Kordasti
  • Matteo Giovanni Della Porta
  • Editor-In-Chief Doris

Best Publications

  • HLA-Mismatched Renal Transplantation without Maintenance Immunosuppression

    Tatsuo Kawai;A. Benedict Cosimi;Thomas Richard Spitzer;Nina Ellen Tolkoff-Rubin

  • Densely Interconnected Transcriptional Circuits Control Cell States in Human Hematopoiesis

    Noa Novershtern;Noa Novershtern;Noa Novershtern;Aravind Subramanian;Lee N. Lawton;Raymond H. Mak

  • Ovarian cancer side population defines cells with stem cell-like characteristics and Mullerian Inhibiting Substance responsiveness

    Paul P. Szotek;Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke;Peter T. Masiakos;Daniela M. Dinulescu

  • In vivo effects of monoclonal antibody to ICAM-1 (CD54) in nonhuman primates with renal allografts.

    A. B. Cosimi;D. Conti;F. L. Delmonico;F. I. Preffer

  • Suppressive Role of B Cells in Chronic Colitis of T Cell Receptor α Mutant Mice

    Atsushi Mizoguchi;Emiko Mizoguchi;R. Neal Smith;Frederic I. Preffer

  • Soluble CD163, a Novel Marker of Activated Macrophages, Is Elevated and Associated With Noncalcified Coronary Plaque in HIV-Infected Patients

    Tricia H. Burdo;Janet Lo;Suhny Abbara;Jeffrey Wei

  • Lymphoma of the ocular adnexa: A study of 353 cases.

    Judith A Ferry;Claire Y Fung;Lawrence Zukerberg;Mark J Lucarelli

  • Differential Sensitivity of p53(-) and p53(+) Cells to Caffeine-induced Radiosensitization and Override of G2 Delay

    Simon N. Powell;Jeffrey S. DeFrank;Paul Connell;Maeve Eogan

  • A phase I trial of immunosuppression with anti-ICAM-1 (CD54) mAb in renal allograft recipients.

    Craig Haug;Robert Colvin;Francis DELMONIco;Hugh Auchincloss

  • Mixed lymphohaemopoietic chimerism and graft-ver suslymphoma effects after non-myeloablative therapy and HLA-mismatched bone-marrow transplantation

    Megan Sykes;Frederic Preffer;Steven McAfee;Susan L Saidman

  • microRNA-mediated control of cell fate in megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors

    Jun Lu;Shangqin Guo;Benjamin L. Ebert;Benjamin L. Ebert;Benjamin L. Ebert;Hao Zhang

  • Myeloma responses and tolerance following combined kidney and nonmyeloablative marrow transplantation: in vivo and in vitro analyses.

    Y. Fudaba;T. R. Spitzer;J. Shaffer;T. Kawai

  • Intentional induction of mixed chimerism and achievement of antitumor responses after nonmyeloablative conditioning therapy and HLA-matched donor bone marrow transplantation for refractory hematologic malignancies.

    Thomas R. Spitzer;Steven McAfee;Robert Sackstein;Christine Colby

  • Global expression analysis of gene regulatory pathways during endocrine pancreatic development.

    Guoqiang Gu;James M. Wells;David Dombkowski;Fred Preffer

  • Regulatory role of mature B cells in A murine model of inflammatory bowel disease

    Emiko Mizoguchi;Atsushi Mizoguchi;Frederic I. Preffer;Atul K. Bhan

  • Long-Term Results in Recipients of Combined HLA-Mismatched Kidney and Bone Marrow Transplantation Without Maintenance Immunosuppression

    T Kawai;D. H Sachs;Ben Sprangers;T. R Spitzer

  • Cytokines IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, GM-CSF and TNFalpha in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and their relationship to treatment with paclitaxel.

    R. T. Penson;K. Kronish;Z. Duan;A. J. Feller

  • Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and classification of primary and recurrent lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of the utility of cytomorphology and flow cytometry.

    Henry Y Dong;Nancy L Harris;Frederic I Preffer;Martha B Pitman

  • Extended rituximab therapy in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

    S. P. Treon;C. Emmanouilides;E. Kimby;A. Kelliher

  • 162 Differential sensitivity of P53+ and P53- cells to caffeine-induced radiosensitization and override of G2 delay

    S.N. Powell;J.S. DeFrank;P. Connell;M. Eogan

Frequent Co-Authors

David Dombkowski
David Dombkowski Harvard University
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Megan Sykes
Megan Sykes Columbia University
Cosimi Ab
Cosimi Ab Harvard University
David H. Sachs
David H. Sachs Columbia University
Nina Tolkoff-Rubin
Nina Tolkoff-Rubin Harvard University
Patricia K. Donahoe
Patricia K. Donahoe Harvard University
Francis L. Delmonico
Francis L. Delmonico Harvard University
José A. Teixeira
José A. Teixeira University of Minho
Nancy Lee Harris
Nancy Lee Harris World Resources Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Many students choose to further their expertise through flexible online programs, allowing them to balance education with work or family commitments. For those interested in healthcare, online nursing programs offer a streamlined route into patient care roles and are a popular step after foundational science studies.

If nutrition or public health is more appealing, earning an online nutrition degree could lead to roles in dietetics or wellness coaching. For those aiming for leadership or management positions in the healthcare sector, cahme accredited mha programs (Master of Health Administration) provide advanced skills in administration and policy.

For nurses seeking a terminal degree without the need for traditional clinical placements, online dnp programs can be an excellent option. These pathways not only ensure career advancement but also allow specialized knowledge application across the evolving landscape of health, biology, and biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Frederic I. Preffer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles