World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
64
Citations
17841
World Ranking
645
National Ranking
75

Riccardo Scarpa publications per year

1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publications
1994 2026

426 publications in total across all disciplines

Riccardo Scarpa publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Scarpa sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 261 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Riccardo Scarpa D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Scarpa sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Riccardo Scarpa is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within economics and agricultural sciences, focusing particularly on economic and environmental valuation, organic food and agriculture, and environmental sustainability in business.

The scientist has published extensively in areas including:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these broad fields, their subfields of study focus on:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Plant Science
  • Marketing
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • General Decision Sciences

Scarpa's main research topics include:

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Housing Market and Economics

They have contributed to an array of peer-reviewed journal articles with recent publications such as:

  • "Methodological Advances in Food Choice Experiments and Modeling: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Research Directions" (2022), Annual Review of Resource Economics
  • "Farm households' perception of weather change and flood adaptations in northern Pakistan" (2021), Ecological Economics
  • "The influence of innovation-adoption characteristics on consumers' trust and purchase intentions of innovative alternative proteins: A comparison between plant-based food, cultured food, and insect-based food" (2023), Food Quality and Preference
  • "Logit Mixed Logit Under Asymmetry and Multimodality of WTP: A Monte Carlo Evaluation" (2020), American Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • "The Participation Dilemma: A Survey of the Empirical Literature on International Environmental Agreement Ratification" (2022), Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Their frequent collaborators include Cristiano Franceschinis, Mara Thiene, Ashar Aftab, Andrea Pellegrini, and Francesco S. Bellelli, with multiple joint publications across their careers.

Scarpa's work has appeared repeatedly in prominent journals such as:

  • Land Economics
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Agricultural Economics
  • Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
  • European Review of Agricultural Economics

Best Publications

  • Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

    Robert J. Johnston;Kevin J. Boyle;Wiktor Adamowicz;Jeff Bennett

  • Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why*

    Riccardo Scarpa;John M. Rose

  • Tourism and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries: A Panel Data Approach

    Juan Luis Eugenio-Martín;Noelia Martín Morales;Riccardo Scarpa

  • Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study

    Silvia Ferrini;Silvia Ferrini;Riccardo Scarpa

  • Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies

    Riccardo Scarpa;Kenneth G. Willis

  • Utility in Willingness to Pay Space: A Tool to Address Confounding Random Scale Effects in Destination Choice to the Alps

    Riccardo Scarpa;Mara Thiene;Kenneth Train

  • Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation

    Riccardo Scarpa;Timothy J. Gilbride;Danny Campbell;David A. Hensher

  • Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences

    Riccardo Scarpa;Mara Thiene

  • Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments

    Riccardo Scarpa;Silvia Ferrini;Kenneth Willis

  • Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics

    Riccardo Scarpa;Anna Alberini

  • Consumers’ perception of quality in organic food: A random utility model under preference heterogeneity and choice correlation from rank‐orderings

    Gianni Cicia;Teresa Del Giudice;Riccardo Scarpa

  • Inferred and Stated Attribute Non-attendance in Food Choice Experiments

    Riccardo Scarpa;Raffaele Zanoli;Viola Bruschi;Simona Naspetti

  • Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments

    Danny Campbell;W. George Hutchinson;Riccardo Scarpa

  • Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies

    Brett Day;Ian J. Bateman;Richard T. Carson;Diane Dupont

  • Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents' rationality in a choice experiment

    Riccardo Scarpa;Danny Campbell;W. George Hutchinson

  • Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models

    Stephen Hynes;Nicholas Hanley;Riccardo Scarpa

  • The quasar relation through cosmic time – II. Evidence for evolution from z = 3 to the present age

    R. Decarli;R. Decarli;R. Falomo;A. Treves;M. Labita

  • The quasar M_bh - M_host relation through Cosmic Time II - Evidence for evolution from z=3 to the present age

    R. Decarli;R. Falomo;A. Treves;M. Labita

  • Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: An empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates

    Riccardo Scarpa;Eric S.K Ruto;Patti Kristjanson;Maren Radeny

  • The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites

    Elisabetta Strazzera;Margarita Genius;Riccardo Scarpa;George Hutchinson

  • Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit: Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy

    Riccardo Scarpa;Teresa Del Giudice

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken Willis
Ken Willis Newcastle University
C. Megan Urry
C. Megan Urry Yale University
Carlo Agostini
Carlo Agostini University of Padua
Aldo Treves
Aldo Treves University of Insubria
Joseph Buongiorno
Joseph Buongiorno University of Wisconsin–Madison
John M. Rose
John M. Rose University of Sydney
Ian J. Bateman
Ian J. Bateman University of Exeter
David A. Hensher
David A. Hensher University of Sydney
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia
Rodolfo M. Nayga
Rodolfo M. Nayga Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees closely linked to Economics and Finance can widen your career options and boost earning potential. For those interested in management, one of the cheapest online masters in project management can provide a practical pathway into leadership roles across industries. Not only are these programs cost-effective, but they also deliver key project planning skills valued by employers.

If you are looking to accelerate your business education, consider one of the best 1 year mba programs. These programs offer an intensive curriculum, enabling you to gain advanced business and financial expertise in a shorter period. For those with entrepreneurial ambitions, online mba programs entrepreneurship combine foundational finance knowledge with the creativity needed to launch and grow new ventures.

If you're uncertain about specializing, learn more about whether is a degree in project management worth it for your career goals. Each option supports advancement in Economics and Finance, opening doors to diverse, high-impact career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Riccardo Scarpa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles