World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
65
Citations
23731
World Ranking
594
National Ranking
13

John M. Rose publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Rose sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 326 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John M. Rose D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Rose sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Rose is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. The primary focus of their research lies in the intersection of economics, econometrics, and finance, with an emphasis on economics and econometrics within this broader field.

The research work covers several subfields and topics, including:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Transportation

  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Housing Market and Economics

John M. Rose has published extensively in various academic venues. The most frequent venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Choice Modelling
  • Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • Marine Policy

Sample recent publications showcase the diversity of their research topics and years of activity:

  • "Preferences for a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia" (2020) published in Vaccine
  • "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging" (2021) published in Journal of Choice Modelling
  • "Getting smarter about household energy: the who and what of demand for smart meters" (2020) published in Building Research & Information
  • "Assessing the willingness of Australian households for adopting home charging stations for electric vehicles" (2023) published in Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • "The issue of microplastic in the oceans: Preferences and willingness to pay to tackle the issue in Australia" (2021) published in Marine Policy

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Andrea Pellegrini
  • Antonio Borriello
  • Paul F. Burke
  • Milad Haghani
  • Michiel C.J. Bliemer

Best Publications

  • Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer

    David A. Hensher;John M. Rose;William H. Greene

  • Applied Choice Analysis

    David A. Hensher;John M. Rose;William H. Greene

  • Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles

    Rico Krueger;Taha H. Rashidi;John M. Rose

  • Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs

    John M. Rose;Michiel C. J. Bliemer

  • Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why*

    Riccardo Scarpa;John M. Rose

  • Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives

    John M. Rose;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;David A. Hensher;Andrew T. Collins

  • Crowding in public transport systems: Effects on users, operation and implications for the estimation of demand

    Alejandro Tirachini;David A. Hensher;John M. Rose

  • Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence

    Zheng Li;David A. Hensher;John M. Rose

  • THE IMPLICATIONS ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY OF RESPONDENTS IGNORING SPECIFIC ATTRIBUTES

    David A. Hensher;John Rose;William H Greene

  • Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;John M. Rose

  • Applied Choice Analysis

    David A. Hensher;John M. Rose;William H. Greene

  • Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

    Michelle J. Irving;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Stephen Jan;Alan Cass

  • Social support and caregiving burden in family caregivers of frail elders.

    Edward H. Thompson;Andrew M. Futterman;Dolores Gallagher-Thompson;Jonathon M. Rose

  • Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments

    John M. Rose;Michiel C. J. Bliemer

  • Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;John M. Rose

  • Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models

    William H. Greene;David A. Hensher;John Rose

  • Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study

    David A. Hensher;John M. Rose

  • Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?

    Simon Fifer;John Rose;Stephen Greaves

  • Approximation of bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs

    Michiel C.J. Bliemer;Michiel C.J. Bliemer;John M. Rose;Stephane Hess;Stephane Hess

  • Long-Term Prognosis of Mitral-Valve Prolapse

    Peter Mills;John Rose;Jane Hollingsworth;Ingrid Amara

  • Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease

    Rachael L. Morton;Paul Snelling;Angela C. Webster;John Rose

  • Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models

    Stephane Hess;John M. Rose;David A. Hensher

  • Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies

    John M. Rose;Michiel C.J. Bliemer

  • Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice

    M.C.J. Bliemer;J.M Rose;R.E.F. Beelaerts van Blokland

  • The implications of willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes

    D A Hensher;J Rose;W H Greene

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephane Hess
Stephane Hess University of Leeds
Stephen Jan
Stephen Jan George Institute for Global Health
Caspar G. Chorus
Caspar G. Chorus Delft University of Technology
Mark Morrison
Mark Morrison University of Queensland
Corinne Mulley
Corinne Mulley University of Sydney
Harmen Oppewal
Harmen Oppewal Monash University
Juan de Dios Ortúzar
Juan de Dios Ortúzar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Mark Wardman
Mark Wardman University of Leeds
John W. Polak
John W. Polak Imperial College London
Jordan J. Louviere
Jordan J. Louviere University of South Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a wide variety of meaningful careers. Many students today are choosing flexible online programs that allow for self-paced study and a balance between work, family, and school life.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, a bachelor of science in psychology provides a solid foundation and can lead to positions in counseling, research, or human resources. If your goal is to become a social worker, you might consider one of the msw degree online options, which offer accessible entry into advanced social work practice and clinical roles.

Aspiring psychologists may want to pursue an online psyd for clinical training that emphasizes hands-on experience in mental health settings. For those focused on supporting families and couples, researching affordable online mft programs can lead to rewarding work as a marriage and family therapist.

With each of these pathways, accreditation, faculty expertise, and practical training opportunities are important factors to consider. Explore each degree to find the best fit for your academic background, career aspirations, and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Rose

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles