World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven J. Chadban

Steven J. Chadban

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23973
World Ranking
16148
National Ranking
537

Steven J. Chadban publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Chadban sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 347 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven J. Chadban D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Chadban sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven J. Chadban is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and specializes in the field of Medicine, with particular focus on nephrology and transplantation. Their research portfolio includes 275 publications predominantly in medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Nephrology, Transplantation, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The primary topics that Chadban explores include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation

Steven J. Chadban has published extensively in several frequent venues, strengthening their presence in the nephrology and transplantation research communities. The most common publication venues include:

  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation

Among their recent scientific papers are:

  • KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation (2020, Transplantation)
  • Dietary Fiber Protects against Diabetic Nephropathy through Short-Chain Fatty Acid-Mediated Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors GPR43 and GPR109A (2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology)
  • Conversion of Urine Protein-Creatinine Ratio or Urine Dipstick Protein to Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio for Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Screening and Prognosis (2020, Annals of Internal Medicine)
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes (2023, JAMA)
  • Death after Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis by Era and Time Post-Transplant (2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology)

Throughout their research career, Chadban has collaborated frequently with peers such as Julian Singer, Tracey Ying, Kate Wyburn, Michael G. Collins, and Navdeep Tangri. Collaborative efforts with these co-authors have been significant, with repeated partnerships contributing to advancements in renal and transplantation medicine.

Best Publications

  • Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor;Mark Woodward

  • Prevalence of Kidney Damage in Australian Adults: The AusDiab Kidney Study

    Stephen J Chadban;Esther Mary Briganti;Peter Kerr;David W Dunstan

  • TLR4 activation mediates kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury

    Huiling Wu;Gang Chen;Kate R. Wyburn;Jianlin Yin

  • Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Subsequent Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease and Mortality

    Josef Coresh;Tanvir Chowdhury Turin;Kunihiro Matsushita;Yingying Sang

  • Results of an international, randomized trial comparing glucose metabolism disorders and outcome with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus.

    F. Vincenti;S. Friman;E. Scheuermann;L. Rostaing

  • Risk of Renal Allograft Loss from Recurrent Glomerulonephritis

    Esther M Briganti;Graeme R Russ;John J McNeil;Robert C Atkins

  • Is Low Birth Weight an Antecedent of CKD in Later Life? A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

    Sarah L. White;Vlado Perkovic;Alan Cass;Choon Lan Chang

  • KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation

    Steven J. Chadban;Curie Ahn;David A. Axelrod;Bethany J. Foster

  • HMGB1 Contributes to Kidney Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

    Huiling Wu;Jin Ma;Peng Wang;Theresa M. Corpuz

  • Therapeutic Inflammatory Monocyte Modulation Using Immune-Modifying Microparticles

    Daniel R. Getts;Daniel R. Getts;Rachael L. Terry;Rachael L. Terry;Meghann Teague Getts;Celine Deffrasnes

  • Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

    Michelle J. Irving;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Stephen Jan;Alan Cass

  • Comparison of the Prevalence and Mortality Risk of CKD in Australia Using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study GFR Estimating Equations: The AusDiab (Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle) Study

    Sarah L White;Kevan R Polkinghorne;Robert Charles Atkins;Robert Charles Atkins;Steven J Chadban;Steven J Chadban

  • Macrophage accumulation in human progressive diabetic nephropathy.

    Duy Nguyen;Fu Ping;Wei Mu;Prudence Hill

  • Autoimmune-prone mice share a promoter haplotype associated with reduced expression and function of the Fc receptor FcγRII

    Nicholas R. Pritchard;Antony J. Cutler;Santiago Uribe;Steven J. Chadban

  • Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Living With CKD

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Steven Chadban;Rowan G. Walker

  • Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Robert S Flanc;Matthew A Roberts;Giovanni F M Strippoli;Giovanni F M Strippoli;Stephen J Chadban

  • Reduction in cardiovascular death after kidney transplantation.

    Helen Pilmore;Hannah Dent;Sean Chang;Stephen P. McDonald

  • Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

    Julio Pascual;Stefan P. Berger;Oliver Witzke;Helio Tedesco

  • Albuminuria is evident in the early stages of diabetes onset: Results from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)

    Robyn Tapp;Jonathan E Shaw;Paul Zev Zimmet;Beverley Balkau

  • The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis.

    Kirsten Howard;Glenn Salkeld;Sarah White;Stephen McDonald

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Alan Cass
Alan Cass Charles Darwin University
Stephen P. McDonald
Stephen P. McDonald University of Adelaide
Robert C. Atkins
Robert C. Atkins Monash Medical Centre
Angela C. Webster
Angela C. Webster University of Sydney
Stephen I. Alexander
Stephen I. Alexander Children's Hospital at Westmead
Jeremy R. Chapman
Jeremy R. Chapman University of Sydney
Jonathan E. Shaw
Jonathan E. Shaw Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Stephen Jan
Stephen Jan George Institute for Global Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up flexible career pathways within healthcare. Students interested in patient care, but not ready to commit to medical school, might consider online pharm d programs. These programs train future pharmacists with the convenience of remote learning.

For those drawn to technology and healthcare data, a career in health informatics offers opportunities to manage patient records and improve healthcare systems. Similarly, online medical billing and coding courses are ideal for those looking to specialize in healthcare administration and insurance processing.

Advanced practice roles, such as nurse practitioners, are in high demand. If you want a direct patient care career, consider enrolling in cheap np programs, which offer an affordable way to gain a respected clinical credential online.

Each of these pathways allows you to contribute significantly to the healthcare system, whether through patient care, administration, or the integration of technology, often with the flexibility and affordability of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Chadban

Trending Scientists