World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven J. Chadban

Steven J. Chadban

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16147 15191 537 524 347 23973

Steven J. Chadban publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven J. Chadban between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven J. Chadban published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2010. 42 of the 448 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2010. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 17 publications
1997 2025

448 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven J. Chadban: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 1
1999 0
2000 3
2001 5
2002 5
2003 14
2004 9
2005 10
2006 11
2007 11
2008 20
2009 6
2010 33
2011 13
2012 20
2013 20
2014 26
2015 14
2016 13
2017 16
2018 21
2019 31
2020 30
2021 26
2022 16
2023 29
2024 25
2025 17
Total 448
Download as CSV

Steven J. Chadban publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Chadban sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 347 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 347
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven J. Chadban D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Chadban sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven J. Chadban is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and specializes in the field of Medicine, with particular focus on nephrology and transplantation. Their research portfolio includes 275 publications predominantly in medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Nephrology, Transplantation, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The primary topics that Chadban explores include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation

Steven J. Chadban has published extensively in several frequent venues, strengthening their presence in the nephrology and transplantation research communities. The most common publication venues include:

  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation

Among their recent scientific papers are:

  • KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation (2020, Transplantation)
  • Dietary Fiber Protects against Diabetic Nephropathy through Short-Chain Fatty Acid-Mediated Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors GPR43 and GPR109A (2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology)
  • Conversion of Urine Protein-Creatinine Ratio or Urine Dipstick Protein to Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio for Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Screening and Prognosis (2020, Annals of Internal Medicine)
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, Albuminuria, and Adverse Outcomes (2023, JAMA)
  • Death after Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis by Era and Time Post-Transplant (2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology)

Throughout their research career, Chadban has collaborated frequently with peers such as Julian Singer, Tracey Ying, Kate Wyburn, Michael G. Collins, and Navdeep Tangri. Collaborative efforts with these co-authors have been significant, with repeated partnerships contributing to advancements in renal and transplantation medicine.

Best Publications

  • Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor;Mark Woodward

  • Prevalence of Kidney Damage in Australian Adults: The AusDiab Kidney Study

    Stephen J Chadban;Esther Mary Briganti;Peter Kerr;David W Dunstan

  • TLR4 activation mediates kidney ischemia/reperfusion injury

    Huiling Wu;Gang Chen;Kate R. Wyburn;Jianlin Yin

  • Decline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Subsequent Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease and Mortality

    Josef Coresh;Tanvir Chowdhury Turin;Kunihiro Matsushita;Yingying Sang

  • Results of an international, randomized trial comparing glucose metabolism disorders and outcome with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus.

    F. Vincenti;S. Friman;E. Scheuermann;L. Rostaing

  • Risk of Renal Allograft Loss from Recurrent Glomerulonephritis

    Esther M Briganti;Graeme R Russ;John J McNeil;Robert C Atkins

  • Is Low Birth Weight an Antecedent of CKD in Later Life? A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

    Sarah L. White;Vlado Perkovic;Alan Cass;Choon Lan Chang

  • HMGB1 Contributes to Kidney Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

    Huiling Wu;Jin Ma;Peng Wang;Theresa M. Corpuz

  • Therapeutic Inflammatory Monocyte Modulation Using Immune-Modifying Microparticles

    Daniel R. Getts;Daniel R. Getts;Rachael L. Terry;Rachael L. Terry;Meghann Teague Getts;Celine Deffrasnes

  • Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

    Michelle J. Irving;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Stephen Jan;Alan Cass

  • Comparison of the Prevalence and Mortality Risk of CKD in Australia Using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study GFR Estimating Equations: The AusDiab (Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle) Study

    Sarah L White;Kevan R Polkinghorne;Robert Charles Atkins;Robert Charles Atkins;Steven J Chadban;Steven J Chadban

  • Macrophage accumulation in human progressive diabetic nephropathy.

    Duy Nguyen;Fu Ping;Wei Mu;Prudence Hill

  • Autoimmune-prone mice share a promoter haplotype associated with reduced expression and function of the Fc receptor FcγRII

    Nicholas R. Pritchard;Antony J. Cutler;Santiago Uribe;Steven J. Chadban

  • Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Living With CKD

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Peter Sainsbury;Peter Sainsbury;Steven Chadban;Rowan G. Walker

  • Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Robert S Flanc;Matthew A Roberts;Giovanni F M Strippoli;Giovanni F M Strippoli;Stephen J Chadban

  • Reduction in cardiovascular death after kidney transplantation.

    Helen Pilmore;Hannah Dent;Sean Chang;Stephen P. McDonald

  • Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

    Julio Pascual;Stefan P. Berger;Oliver Witzke;Helio Tedesco

  • Albuminuria is evident in the early stages of diabetes onset: Results from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)

    Robyn Tapp;Jonathan E Shaw;Paul Zev Zimmet;Beverley Balkau

  • The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis.

    Kirsten Howard;Glenn Salkeld;Sarah White;Stephen McDonald

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Alan Cass
Alan Cass Charles Darwin University
Stephen P. McDonald
Stephen P. McDonald University of Adelaide
Robert C. Atkins
Robert C. Atkins Monash Medical Centre
Angela C. Webster
Angela C. Webster University of Sydney
Stephen I. Alexander
Stephen I. Alexander Children's Hospital at Westmead
Jeremy R. Chapman
Jeremy R. Chapman University of Sydney
Jonathan E. Shaw
Jonathan E. Shaw Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Stephen Jan
Stephen Jan George Institute for Global Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up flexible career pathways within healthcare. Students interested in patient care, but not ready to commit to medical school, might consider online pharm d programs. These programs train future pharmacists with the convenience of remote learning.

For those drawn to technology and healthcare data, a career in health informatics offers opportunities to manage patient records and improve healthcare systems. Similarly, online medical billing and coding courses are ideal for those looking to specialize in healthcare administration and insurance processing.

Advanced practice roles, such as nurse practitioners, are in high demand. If you want a direct patient care career, consider enrolling in cheap np programs, which offer an affordable way to gain a respected clinical credential online.

Each of these pathways allows you to contribute significantly to the healthcare system, whether through patient care, administration, or the integration of technology, often with the flexibility and affordability of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Chadban

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles