World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
62
Citations
11066
World Ranking
1300
National Ranking
96

Charlotte E. Rees publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte E. Rees sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 204 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charlotte E. Rees D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte E. Rees sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charlotte E. Rees is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, Emergency Medical Services, and Gender Studies.

Their work focuses on topics such as Innovations in Medical Education, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, and Medical Education and Admissions.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Claire Palermo, Ella Ottrey, Lynn V. Monrouxe, Van N. B. Nguyen, and Mahbub Sarkar.

Charlotte E. Rees has published multiple papers, including:

  • The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education's research, 2020, Medical Education
  • Doctors' identity transitions: Choosing to occupy a state of 'betwixt and between', 2020, Medical Education
  • Internal coherence matters: Lessons for nutrition and dietetics research, 2021, Nutrition & Dietetics
  • Exploring the impact of education on preclinical medical students' tolerance of uncertainty: a qualitative longitudinal study, 2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • Exploring health care graduates' conceptualisations of preparedness for practice: A longitudinal qualitative research study, 2021, Medical Education

Their work is frequently published in venues such as Medical Education, Nutrition & Dietetics, Nurse Education Today, Medical Teacher, and Frontiers in Medicine, reflecting a consistent engagement with scholarly outlets focused on education and clinical practice within health sciences.

Best Publications

  • Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking.

    Lara Varpio;Rola Ajjawi;Lynn V Monrouxe;Bridget C O'Brien

  • Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

    Brian David Hodges;Shiphra R. Ginsburg;Richard Cruess;Sylvia Cruess

  • The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998.

    Charlotte E. Rees;Peter A. Bath

  • Differences in medical students' explicit discourses of professionalism: acting, representing, becoming

    Lynn Valerie Monrouxe;Charlotte E. Rees;Wendy Hu

  • The development of a scale to measure medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning: the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS).

    Charlotte Rees;Charlotte Sheard;Susie Davies

  • Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

    Charlotte E Rees;Jillyan E Ford;Charlotte E Sheard

  • Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of men with prostate cancer and their partners: a review of the literature.

    Kezia N. Echlin;Charlotte E. Rees

  • Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet

    Gbogboade Ademiluyi;Charlotte E Rees;Charlotte E Sheard

  • Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students.

    Jennifer A Cleland;Lynn V Knight;Charlotte E Rees;Susan Tracey

  • Information-seeking behaviors of women with breast cancer.

    Charlotte E. Rees;Peter A. Bath

  • Medical students' views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills.

    Charlotte Rees;Charlotte Sheard;Amy McPherson

  • Re-visioning Academic Medicine Through a Constructionist Lens.

    Charlotte E Rees;Paul E S Crampton;Lynn V Monrouxe

  • Emotional intelligence medical education: measuring the unmeasurable?

    Natalie J. Lewis;Charlotte E. Rees;J. Nicky Hudson;Alan Bleakley

  • Professionalism dilemmas, moral distress and the healthcare student: insights from two online UK-wide questionnaire studies

    Lynn V Monrouxe;Charlotte Emma Rees;Ian Dennis;Stephanie E Wells

  • Narrative, emotion and action: analysing ‘most memorable’ professionalism dilemmas

    Charlotte E. Rees;Lynn Valerie Monrouxe;Laura A. McDonald

  • The relationship between medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics.

    Charlotte Rees;Charlotte Sheard

  • Theory in medical education research: how do we get there?

    Charlotte Emma Rees;Lynn V Monrouxe

  • 'Even now it makes me angry': health care students' professionalism dilemma narratives

    Lynn V Monrouxe;Charlotte E Rees;Ruth Endacott;Edwina Ternan

  • “It’s just a clash of cultures”: emotional talk within medical students’ narratives of professionalism dilemmas

    Lynn Valerie Monrouxe;Charlotte E. Rees

  • Students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours.

    Charlotte Rees;Maggie Shepherd

  • Viewpoint: The Trouble with Assessing Students’ Professionalism: Theoretical Insights from Sociocognitive Psychology

    Charlotte E. Rees;Lynn V. Knight

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Cleland
Jennifer Cleland Nanyang Technological University
Brett Williams
Brett Williams Monash University
Ted Brown
Ted Brown Monash University
Elizabeth Molloy
Elizabeth Molloy University of Melbourne
Becky Francis
Becky Francis University College London
Eric S. Holmboe
Eric S. Holmboe California University of Pennsylvania
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network
Alan Bleakley
Alan Bleakley Plymouth University
Richard L. Cruess
Richard L. Cruess McGill University
Charles R. Figley
Charles R. Figley Tulane University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities online opens up diverse career options, especially in the fields of psychology, social work, and counseling. Flexible online pathways can be an ideal solution for students balancing work or family commitments.

If you’re interested in understanding human behavior or mental health, consider an online degree in psychology. These programs cover foundational theories and skills, preparing graduates for roles in counseling, human resources, or further study.

For those drawn to helping individuals and communities, msw schools offer convenient pathways to earn a Master of Social Work online, paving the way for licensure and advanced social work careers.

Students aiming for clinical practice or advanced psychological assessment can explore psyd psychology programs, which focus on practical training for licensure as psychologists.

If your goal is to support families and couples, the best online mft programs train you to become a marriage and family therapist, even on an accelerated schedule. These career pathways are in high demand and offer meaningful, impactful work in a range of settings.

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte E. Rees

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles