World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
81
Citations
23618
World Ranking
354
National Ranking
21

Lorelei Lingard publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorelei Lingard sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 349 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lorelei Lingard D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorelei Lingard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorelei Lingard is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular attention to subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine, General Health Professions, Education, and Family Practice.

The main topics of Lingard's work include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration

Lingard has contributed research articles to a number of publication venues, including:

  • Medical Education
  • Academic Medicine
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Beyond summative decision making: Illuminating the broader roles of competence committees," 2020, Medical Education
  • "Use of Resident-Sensitive Quality Measure Data in Entrustment Decision Making: A Qualitative Study of Clinical Competency Committee Members at One Pediatric Residency," 2020, Academic Medicine
  • "The fatigue paradox: Team perceptions of physician fatigue," 2021, Medical Education
  • "Exploring implicit influences on interprofessional collaboration: a scoping review," 2021, Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • "'I Think Many of Them Want to Appear to Have a Growth Mindset': Exploring Supervisors' Perceptions of Feedback-Seeking Behavior," 2024, Academic Medicine

Frequent collaborators in Lingard's research include Sayra Cristancho, Emily Field, Taryn Taylor, Christopher Watling, and Richard A. Cherry. These colleagues have co-authored multiple papers, contributing to various studies in the domain of medical education and health professions.

Best Publications

  • Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects

    Lorelei Lingard;S. Espin;S. Whyte;G. Regehr

  • Critically appraising qualitative research

    Ayelet Kuper;Lorelei Lingard;Wendy Levinson

  • Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research.

    Lorelei Lingard;Mathieu Albert;Wendy Levinson

  • Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication

    Lorelei Lingard;Glenn Regehr;Beverley Orser;Richard Reznick

  • Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70

    Christopher J Watling;Lorelei Lingard

  • Making Sense of Grounded Theory in Medical Education

    Tara J T Kennedy;Lorelei A Lingard

  • Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices.

    Lorelei Lingard;Richard Reznick;Sherry Espin;Glenn Regehr

  • Context, Conflict, and Resolution: A New Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Professionalism

    Shiphra Ginsburg;Glenn Regehr;Rose Hatala;Nancy Mcnaughton

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Forming professional identities on the health care team: discursive constructions of the ‘other’ in the operating room

    Lorelei Lingard;R. Reznick;I. DeVito;S. Espin

  • Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR

    Lorelei Lingard;S. Espin;B. Rubin;S. Whyte

  • A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity

    Lorelei Lingard;K. Garwood;C. F. Schryer;M. M. Spafford

  • The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team

    Lorelei Lingard;Sherry Espin;Cathy Evans;Laura Hawryluck

  • Why Open-Ended Survey Questions Are Unlikely to Support Rigorous Qualitative Insights.

    Kori A. LaDonna;Taryn Taylor;Lorelei Lingard

  • Progressive independence in clinical training: a tradition worth defending?

    Tara J T Kennedy;Glenn Regehr;G Ross Baker;Lorelei A Lingard

  • Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements.

    Christopher Watling;Erik Driessen;Cees P M van der Vleuten;Lorelei Lingard

  • Clinical Oversight: Conceptualizing the Relationship Between Supervision and Safety

    Tara J T Kennedy;Tara J T Kennedy;Lorelei Lingard;Lorelei Lingard;G. Ross Baker;Lisa Kitchen

  • Point-of-care assessment of medical trainee competence for independent clinical work.

    Tara J. T. Kennedy;Glenn Regehr;G Ross Baker;Lorelei Lingard

  • Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees’ requests for clinical support

    Tara J T Kennedy;Glenn Regehr;G Ross Baker;Lorelei Lingard

  • Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications.

    Richard J. Haber;Lorelei A. Lingard

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
Shiphra Ginsburg
Shiphra Ginsburg University of Toronto
Pim W. Teunissen
Pim W. Teunissen Maastricht University
G. Ross Baker
G. Ross Baker University of Toronto
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Erik W. Driessen
Erik W. Driessen Maastricht University
Beverley A. Orser
Beverley A. Orser University of Toronto
Tim Dornan
Tim Dornan Queen's University Belfast
Scott Reeves
Scott Reeves St George's, University of London
Wendy Levinson
Wendy Levinson University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to impactful professions, especially when you pursue advanced or specialized online degrees. MSW accelerated programs allow you to fast-track your journey into social work, helping individuals and communities overcome challenges. These programs are ideal if you're looking for flexibility and a quicker path to licensure.

If you're interested in human behavior and mental health, an accelerated bachelor's in psychology offers a focused way to complete your degree and launch your career sooner. For those thinking about counseling, choosing from CACREP accredited online counseling programs ensures you meet high standards for credentials and professional recognition.

Aspiring therapists can benefit from enrolling in marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by recognized bodies. These comprehensive degrees prepare you to support families and couples while offering flexible online learning options.

Online pathways make it easier to balance life’s demands while advancing toward meaningful, people-centered careers in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Lorelei Lingard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles