World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9751 9151 944 900 579 30719

Nick Sevdalis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nick Sevdalis between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nick Sevdalis published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 32.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2011. 40 of the 652 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2011. 2006: 12 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 59 publications 2012: 56 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 50 publications 2022: 51 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 17 publications
2006 2025

652 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nick Sevdalis: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 12
2007 8
2008 13
2009 17
2010 29
2011 59
2012 56
2013 37
2014 44
2015 36
2016 34
2017 32
2018 24
2019 39
2020 41
2021 50
2022 51
2023 30
2024 23
2025 17
Total 652
Download as CSV

Nick Sevdalis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Sevdalis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 579 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 579
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nick Sevdalis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Sevdalis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nick Sevdalis is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research expertise spans across the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a substantial focus on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their body of work covers numerous topics, including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Nick Sevdalis has contributed to multiple publications across various venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Health Services
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Among the recent papers, the following stand out by title, year, and publication venue:

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: Results from the 'COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptability Study' (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study, 2021, The Lancet
  • Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review, 2020, Implementation Science

Their work is often collaborative, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Tayana Soukup
  • Ioannis Bakolis
  • James Green
  • Susan M. Sherman
  • Louise Smith

Best Publications

  • Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review

    Ohid Yaqub;Sophie Castle-Clarke;Nick Sevdalis;Joanna Chataway

  • The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.

    Sonal Arora;Nick Sevdalis;Debra Nestel;Debra Nestel;Maria Woloshynowych

  • Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

    Rachel E. Davis;Rosamond Jacklin;Nick Sevdalis;Charles A. Vincent

  • Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review

    Katrina F. Brown;J. Simon Kroll;Michael J. Hudson;Mary Ramsay

  • Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies.

    Sonal Arora;Hutan Ashrafian;Rachel Davis;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Quality of Care Management Decisions by Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams: A Systematic Review

    Benjamin W. Lamb;Katrina F. Brown;Kamal Nagpal;Charles Vincent

  • Understanding the Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing within hospitals: The role of ‘Prescribing Etiquette’

    E. Charani;E. Castro-Sanchez;Nick Sevdalis;Y. Kyratsis

  • The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review.

    Louise Hull;Sonal Arora;Rajesh Aggarwal;Ara Darzi

  • Do Safety Checklists Improve Teamwork and Communication in the Operating Room? A Systematic Review

    Stephanie Russ;Shantanu Rout;Nick Sevdalis;Krishna Moorthy

  • Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams.

    Maximilian J. Johnston;Dominic King;Sonal Arora;Nebil Behar

  • Catastrophizing: a predictive factor for postoperative pain.

    Reenam S. Khan;Kamran Ahmed;Elizabeth Blakeway;Petros Skapinakis

  • Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

    A N Healey;N Sevdalis;C A Vincent

  • Mental Practice Enhances Surgical Technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study

    Sonal Arora;Rajesh Aggarwal;Pramudith Sirimanna;Aidan Moran

  • Effect of the World Health Organization Checklist on Patient Outcomes: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    Arvid Steinar Haugen;Eirik Søfteland;Stian Kreken Almeland;Nick Sevdalis

  • Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion?

    Shabnam Undre;Nick Sevdalis;Andrew N. Healey;Sir Ara Darzi

  • A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".

    Stephanie J. Russ;Nick Sevdalis;Krishna Moorthy;Erik K. Mayer

  • Behavior change strategies to influence antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: a systematic review.

    Esmita Charani;Rachel Edwards;Nick Sevdalis;Banos Alexandrou

  • Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature

    Tayana Soukup;Benjamin W Lamb;Sonal Arora;Ara Darzi

  • Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams.

    Nick Sevdalis;Nick Sevdalis;Rachel Davis;Mary Koutantji;Shabnam Undre

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Vincent
Charles Vincent University of Oxford
Ara Darzi
Ara Darzi Imperial College London
Roger Kneebone
Roger Kneebone Imperial College London
Rajesh Aggarwal
Rajesh Aggarwal Thomas Jefferson University
Debra Nestel
Debra Nestel Monash University
Geir Egil Eide
Geir Egil Eide University of Bergen
Thanos Athanasiou
Thanos Athanasiou Imperial College London
Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
Alison Holmes
Alison Holmes Imperial College London
Charlotte Hanlon
Charlotte Hanlon King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medical careers beyond the traditional MD track, online degrees offer flexible and diversified pathways. Options like online dnp programs allow registered nurses to quickly advance to high-level nursing roles while balancing other commitments.

Many are also exploring dnp programs online for their accessible entry requirements and convenient formats, making leadership or specialized nursing careers more achievable.

If you’re aiming to enter the workforce sooner, fast track lpn programs provide an accelerated path to licensure. These programs help students start working in practical nursing in less time than traditional routes.

Growing mental health needs have also increased demand for professionals with specialized skills. The fastest psych np program options prepare nurses to serve as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners — a critical and expanding role in healthcare today.

Each of these online programs can help you shape a rewarding career in healthcare with flexible study options tailored to modern learners.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Sevdalis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles