World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
30719
World Ranking
9752
National Ranking
947

Nick Sevdalis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Sevdalis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 579 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nick Sevdalis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Sevdalis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick Sevdalis is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research expertise spans across the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a substantial focus on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their body of work covers numerous topics, including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Nick Sevdalis has contributed to multiple publications across various venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Health Services
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Among the recent papers, the following stand out by title, year, and publication venue:

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: Results from the 'COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptability Study' (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study, 2021, The Lancet
  • Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review, 2020, Implementation Science

Their work is often collaborative, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Tayana Soukup
  • Ioannis Bakolis
  • James Green
  • Susan M. Sherman
  • Louise Smith

Best Publications

  • Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review

    Ohid Yaqub;Sophie Castle-Clarke;Nick Sevdalis;Joanna Chataway

  • COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

    Susan Mary Sherman;Louise E. Smith;Julius Sim;Richard Amlôt;Richard Amlôt

  • The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.

    Sonal Arora;Nick Sevdalis;Debra Nestel;Debra Nestel;Maria Woloshynowych

  • Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

    Rachel E. Davis;Rosamond Jacklin;Nick Sevdalis;Charles A. Vincent

  • Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review

    Katrina F. Brown;J. Simon Kroll;Michael J. Hudson;Mary Ramsay

  • Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies.

    Sonal Arora;Hutan Ashrafian;Rachel Davis;Thanos Athanasiou

  • Quality of Care Management Decisions by Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams: A Systematic Review

    Benjamin W. Lamb;Katrina F. Brown;Kamal Nagpal;Charles Vincent

  • Understanding the Determinants of Antimicrobial Prescribing within hospitals: The role of ‘Prescribing Etiquette’

    E. Charani;E. Castro-Sanchez;Nick Sevdalis;Y. Kyratsis

  • The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review.

    Louise Hull;Sonal Arora;Rajesh Aggarwal;Ara Darzi

  • Do Safety Checklists Improve Teamwork and Communication in the Operating Room? A Systematic Review

    Stephanie Russ;Shantanu Rout;Nick Sevdalis;Krishna Moorthy

  • Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams.

    Maximilian J. Johnston;Dominic King;Sonal Arora;Nebil Behar

  • Catastrophizing: a predictive factor for postoperative pain.

    Reenam S. Khan;Kamran Ahmed;Elizabeth Blakeway;Petros Skapinakis

  • Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

    A N Healey;N Sevdalis;C A Vincent

  • Mental Practice Enhances Surgical Technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study

    Sonal Arora;Rajesh Aggarwal;Pramudith Sirimanna;Aidan Moran

  • Effect of the World Health Organization Checklist on Patient Outcomes: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    Arvid Steinar Haugen;Eirik Søfteland;Stian Kreken Almeland;Nick Sevdalis

  • Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion?

    Shabnam Undre;Nick Sevdalis;Andrew N. Healey;Sir Ara Darzi

  • A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".

    Stephanie J. Russ;Nick Sevdalis;Krishna Moorthy;Erik K. Mayer

  • Behavior change strategies to influence antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: a systematic review.

    Esmita Charani;Rachel Edwards;Nick Sevdalis;Banos Alexandrou

  • Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature

    Tayana Soukup;Benjamin W Lamb;Sonal Arora;Ara Darzi

  • Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams.

    Nick Sevdalis;Nick Sevdalis;Rachel Davis;Mary Koutantji;Shabnam Undre

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Vincent
Charles Vincent University of Oxford
Ara Darzi
Ara Darzi Imperial College London
Roger Kneebone
Roger Kneebone Imperial College London
Rajesh Aggarwal
Rajesh Aggarwal Thomas Jefferson University
Debra Nestel
Debra Nestel Monash University
Geir Egil Eide
Geir Egil Eide University of Bergen
Thanos Athanasiou
Thanos Athanasiou Imperial College London
Gregory L. Moneta
Gregory L. Moneta Oregon Health & Science University
Alison Holmes
Alison Holmes Imperial College London
Charlotte Hanlon
Charlotte Hanlon King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medical careers beyond the traditional MD track, online degrees offer flexible and diversified pathways. Options like online dnp programs allow registered nurses to quickly advance to high-level nursing roles while balancing other commitments.

Many are also exploring dnp programs online for their accessible entry requirements and convenient formats, making leadership or specialized nursing careers more achievable.

If you’re aiming to enter the workforce sooner, fast track lpn programs provide an accelerated path to licensure. These programs help students start working in practical nursing in less time than traditional routes.

Growing mental health needs have also increased demand for professionals with specialized skills. The fastest psych np program options prepare nurses to serve as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners — a critical and expanding role in healthcare today.

Each of these online programs can help you shape a rewarding career in healthcare with flexible study options tailored to modern learners.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Sevdalis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles