World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
37375
World Ranking
10772
National Ranking
334

Guy J. Maddern publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy J. Maddern sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 759 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Guy J. Maddern D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy J. Maddern sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Guy J. Maddern is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research contributions are primarily within the field of Medicine, with a substantial focus on Surgery. Additional subfields of study include Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's recent publications cover a variety of topics relevant to surgical practice and healthcare. Notable papers include:

  • The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring, 2024, Nature Medicine
  • Screening and testing for COVID-19 before surgery, 2020, ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • Surgery triage during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant escapes neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses more efficiently than other variants in mild COVID-19 convalescents, 2022, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Depression after stoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, BMC Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Guy J. Maddern include:

  • Joshua G. Kovoor
  • Aashray Gupta
  • Stephen Bacchi
  • Brandon Stretton
  • Suzanne Edwards

The most common venues for Guy J. Maddern's work are:

  • ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • British Journal of Surgery
  • World Journal of Surgery
  • Surgery
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

The main research topics addressed include:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

In recognition of their contributions to health and medical science, Guy J. Maddern was awarded the Fellowship of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)

    Nuh N. Rahbari;O. James Garden;Robert Padbury;Mark Brooke-Smith

  • No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.

    Peter McCulloch;Douglas G Altman;W Bruce Campbell;David R Flum

  • Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery.

    Moritz Koch;O. James Garden;Robert Padbury;Nuh N. Rahbari

  • Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review.

    Andrew E Chapman;George Kiroff;Philip Game;Bruce Foster

  • A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training.

    Lana P. Sturm;John A. Windsor;Peter H. Cosman;Patrick Cregan

  • Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

    Leanne M. Sutherland;Philippa F. Middleton;Adrian Anthony;Jeffrey Hamdorf

  • Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.

    Jeffrey S Barkun;Jeffrey K Aronson;Liane S Feldman;Guy J Maddern

  • Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review.

    Amber M Watt;Ian G Faragher;Tabatha T Griffin;Nicholas A Rieger

  • Mesh compared with non‐mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    A. Grant

  • Bioengineered skin substitutes for the management of burns: a systematic review.

    Clarabelle Pham;John Greenwood;Heather Cleland;Peter Woodruff

  • Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation‐based training

    S R Dawe;G N Pena;G N Pena;J A Windsor;J A J L Broeders

  • Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    A. Grant

  • Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)

    Nuh N. Rahbari;O. James Garden;Robert Padbury;Guy Maddern

  • Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: A prospective randomized trial

    M Goldminc;G Maddern;E Le Prise;B Meunier

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review

    Philippa F. Middleton;Leanne M. Sutherland;Guy J. Maddern

  • A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals

    Rebecca Tooher;Philippa Middleton;Clarabelle Pham;Robert Fitridge

  • Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial

    Andrew Luck;Sue Pearson;Guy Maddern;Peter Hewett

  • Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review

    Leanne M Sutherland;John A R Williams;Robert Thomas Padbury;David C Gotley

  • Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review

    Eliana Della Flora;Caryn L. Perera;Alun L. Cameron;Guy J. Maddern;Guy J. Maddern

  • Living Donor Liver Transplantation - Adult Donor Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    Philippa F Middleton;Michael D Duffield;Stephen Lynch;Robert Thomas Padbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Glyn G. Jamieson
Glyn G. Jamieson University of Adelaide
Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Jean Nicolas Vauthey
Jean Nicolas Vauthey The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Judith M. Wishart
Judith M. Wishart University of Adelaide
Leslie H. Blumgart
Leslie H. Blumgart Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John A. Windsor
John A. Windsor University of Auckland
Lorenzo Capussotti
Lorenzo Capussotti University of Milan
David Scott
David Scott Ascension Health
Ronald P. DeMatteo
Ronald P. DeMatteo University of Pennsylvania
Peter Roberts-Thomson
Peter Roberts-Thomson Flinders Medical Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees can open doors to rewarding careers beyond traditional medical school. Many students interested in healthcare pursue online adn programs, which allow for a flexible and faster route to becoming a registered nurse.

For those who prefer administrative or clerical work, medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid offer a practical path into the healthcare system with excellent job prospects and the benefit of remote study.

Students looking for fewer entrance barriers might consider nursing schools that don't require teas, making the application process simpler and more accessible. This is especially helpful for those who are eager to start their nursing careers quickly.

If you’re interested in the business or leadership side of healthcare, choosing from health care administration degree programs can prepare you for management roles in a growing industry. Each of these online options provides flexible learning and diverse career pathways for future healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Guy J. Maddern

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles